<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 key Lib Dem questions for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sesenco</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104504</link>
		<dc:creator>Sesenco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104504</guid>
		<description>(1) It is difficult to assess the vulnerability of our existing seats (in 2005, Ashcroft money shifted votes in some, but not others). I think we will hold most of them, provided resources are used wisely, and regional organisers rather than local d***heads run the campaigns. I won&#039;t say which I consider the ropiest to be, as I don&#039;t want to give the enemy encouragement. And let&#039;s not forget possible gains from the Tories - Eastbourne, Chelmsford, Guildford; St Albans as a longshot? From Labour, we might be looking at Islington South, Hampstead &amp; Kilburn, Watford, Oxford East, Edinburgh South, Oldham East &amp; Saddleworth, perhaps; with Liverpool Wavertree, Derby North, Bradford East, the Newcastles, Durham and Hull North as distant longshots. So I am relatively optimistic. Those Tory trolls who bombarded this site last summer with attacks on Lord Rennard did so because they knew that Rennard&#039;s methodology remains crucial to our success. More fool those ingenues who believed them.

(2) Clegg will do OK. He won&#039;t crumble under pressure like Kennedy did. His command of policy is good, he doesn&#039;t use irritating phrases like &quot;in terms of&quot; and I don&#039;t think he will rile easily. I do worry about the professionalism of some of those around him, however (talking out loud on aeroplanes, etc).

(3) We won&#039;t advance as much as we would if there was no General Election on the same day.

(4) Clegg must resist the temptation to listen to Cameron&#039;s siren voice.

(5) We continue to promote our own agenda. We don&#039;t often win seats from Labour in areas where there is no existing infrastructure.

(6) I sincerely hope none does. 

(7) Pass.

(8) One extra in Scotland (Edinburgh South). I doubt if we will win anything else in Wales.

(9) Ros Scott will follow the line of least resistance. You don&#039;t expect her to have a public row with Clegg?

(10) Maybe someone who hasn&#039;t even started blogging yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) It is difficult to assess the vulnerability of our existing seats (in 2005, Ashcroft money shifted votes in some, but not others). I think we will hold most of them, provided resources are used wisely, and regional organisers rather than local d***heads run the campaigns. I won&#8217;t say which I consider the ropiest to be, as I don&#8217;t want to give the enemy encouragement. And let&#8217;s not forget possible gains from the Tories &#8211; Eastbourne, Chelmsford, Guildford; St Albans as a longshot? From Labour, we might be looking at Islington South, Hampstead &amp; Kilburn, Watford, Oxford East, Edinburgh South, Oldham East &amp; Saddleworth, perhaps; with Liverpool Wavertree, Derby North, Bradford East, the Newcastles, Durham and Hull North as distant longshots. So I am relatively optimistic. Those Tory trolls who bombarded this site last summer with attacks on Lord Rennard did so because they knew that Rennard&#8217;s methodology remains crucial to our success. More fool those ingenues who believed them.</p>
<p>(2) Clegg will do OK. He won&#8217;t crumble under pressure like Kennedy did. His command of policy is good, he doesn&#8217;t use irritating phrases like &#8220;in terms of&#8221; and I don&#8217;t think he will rile easily. I do worry about the professionalism of some of those around him, however (talking out loud on aeroplanes, etc).</p>
<p>(3) We won&#8217;t advance as much as we would if there was no General Election on the same day.</p>
<p>(4) Clegg must resist the temptation to listen to Cameron&#8217;s siren voice.</p>
<p>(5) We continue to promote our own agenda. We don&#8217;t often win seats from Labour in areas where there is no existing infrastructure.</p>
<p>(6) I sincerely hope none does. </p>
<p>(7) Pass.</p>
<p>(8) One extra in Scotland (Edinburgh South). I doubt if we will win anything else in Wales.</p>
<p>(9) Ros Scott will follow the line of least resistance. You don&#8217;t expect her to have a public row with Clegg?</p>
<p>(10) Maybe someone who hasn&#8217;t even started blogging yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burkesworks</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104487</link>
		<dc:creator>burkesworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104487</guid>
		<description>1. Around 57 seats. There&#039;ll be a fair few losses to the Tories in the south, offset by gains from Labour in the north and inner London.

2. Solid but unspectacular. He won&#039;t make any gaffes but he&#039;ll hardly inspire the floating voters either (but Vince might)

3. Unlikely. 2006 was a relatively high water mark for council elections. Expect to lose out to the Tories in rural areas, but more than hold our own in the cities and consolidate in such as Bristol, Sheffield and Hull.

4. If Nick knows what&#039;s good for him he should stay well clear of any formal coalitions and instead treat each piece of Parliamentary business on a case-by-case basis.

5. Hopefully become more radical and less supine towards business interests.

6. Unlikely - unless they defect.

7. Yes, but not by a huge amount. 22-23% tops.

8. Scotland - maybe, especially around Edinburgh. Wales - no. In fact, only Cardiff Central looks truly safe, thanks to the tireless efforts of the member for Montgomery to turn his seat into a Tory marginal.

9. A very quiet one. I see no challenge, though, as I see no challengers.

10.  Guaranteed to be at least one gaffe somewhere; you can bet that the Tory blogosphere will jump on it too. Regarding &quot;Blog of the Year&quot; whose awards are you referring to? If it&#039;s Dale&#039;s, it&#039;ll go to Nich Starling if Charlotte stays out. If it&#039;s anyone else&#039;s it&#039;ll go to Alix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Around 57 seats. There&#8217;ll be a fair few losses to the Tories in the south, offset by gains from Labour in the north and inner London.</p>
<p>2. Solid but unspectacular. He won&#8217;t make any gaffes but he&#8217;ll hardly inspire the floating voters either (but Vince might)</p>
<p>3. Unlikely. 2006 was a relatively high water mark for council elections. Expect to lose out to the Tories in rural areas, but more than hold our own in the cities and consolidate in such as Bristol, Sheffield and Hull.</p>
<p>4. If Nick knows what&#8217;s good for him he should stay well clear of any formal coalitions and instead treat each piece of Parliamentary business on a case-by-case basis.</p>
<p>5. Hopefully become more radical and less supine towards business interests.</p>
<p>6. Unlikely &#8211; unless they defect.</p>
<p>7. Yes, but not by a huge amount. 22-23% tops.</p>
<p>8. Scotland &#8211; maybe, especially around Edinburgh. Wales &#8211; no. In fact, only Cardiff Central looks truly safe, thanks to the tireless efforts of the member for Montgomery to turn his seat into a Tory marginal.</p>
<p>9. A very quiet one. I see no challenge, though, as I see no challengers.</p>
<p>10.  Guaranteed to be at least one gaffe somewhere; you can bet that the Tory blogosphere will jump on it too. Regarding &#8220;Blog of the Year&#8221; whose awards are you referring to? If it&#8217;s Dale&#8217;s, it&#8217;ll go to Nich Starling if Charlotte stays out. If it&#8217;s anyone else&#8217;s it&#8217;ll go to Alix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Page</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104445</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104445</guid>
		<description>1. We&#039;ll see slightly fewer MPs elected - around 55, with most of our gains from Labour and most of our losses to the Tories. Our share of the popular vote will be squeezed to under 20%.

2. Nick will put in a credible but uninspiring performance as leader; the leaders&#039; debates will be good for us as a party, but not at this election. A gaffe is unlikely but not impossible.

3. Not sure about the local elections. I suspect again we&#039;ll be squeezed by the Tories, but not by much.

4. I think Nick will realise that a formal coalition with either Labour or the Tories would be the fastest way to comprehensively destroy the Liberal Democrat party. I predict a minority Conservative administration followed by a second General Election in 2011 or 2012. The minority Government will avoid enacting Lib Dem policies as part of a campaign to make us seem politically irrelevant to the electorate.

5. I think that the party will continue to neglect the importance of capacity building, concentrating instead on throwing everything at every by-election going. More local parties will become defunct.

6. I hope no party senior figure would take an official position in Government, and can&#039;t really see this happening.

7. The party&#039;s December 2010 poll ratings will be around 15%.

8. The Lib Dems will lose MPs in Scotland, and stay steady in Wales but not improve.

9. I&#039;ve seen no evidence of the President attempting to be the voice of the membership to date, and have no reason to believe this will change. I hope she faces a challenge as president so I can vote against her again, but the recent stitching-up of the candidacy rules makes this unlikely.

10. I think the General Election will demonstrate that grass-roots blogging is overrated as an campaign tactic, but will see more localised (either in terms of geography or subject) and semi-official group blogging. There will be a few blog-related scandals during the GE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. We&#8217;ll see slightly fewer MPs elected &#8211; around 55, with most of our gains from Labour and most of our losses to the Tories. Our share of the popular vote will be squeezed to under 20%.</p>
<p>2. Nick will put in a credible but uninspiring performance as leader; the leaders&#8217; debates will be good for us as a party, but not at this election. A gaffe is unlikely but not impossible.</p>
<p>3. Not sure about the local elections. I suspect again we&#8217;ll be squeezed by the Tories, but not by much.</p>
<p>4. I think Nick will realise that a formal coalition with either Labour or the Tories would be the fastest way to comprehensively destroy the Liberal Democrat party. I predict a minority Conservative administration followed by a second General Election in 2011 or 2012. The minority Government will avoid enacting Lib Dem policies as part of a campaign to make us seem politically irrelevant to the electorate.</p>
<p>5. I think that the party will continue to neglect the importance of capacity building, concentrating instead on throwing everything at every by-election going. More local parties will become defunct.</p>
<p>6. I hope no party senior figure would take an official position in Government, and can&#8217;t really see this happening.</p>
<p>7. The party&#8217;s December 2010 poll ratings will be around 15%.</p>
<p>8. The Lib Dems will lose MPs in Scotland, and stay steady in Wales but not improve.</p>
<p>9. I&#8217;ve seen no evidence of the President attempting to be the voice of the membership to date, and have no reason to believe this will change. I hope she faces a challenge as president so I can vote against her again, but the recent stitching-up of the candidacy rules makes this unlikely.</p>
<p>10. I think the General Election will demonstrate that grass-roots blogging is overrated as an campaign tactic, but will see more localised (either in terms of geography or subject) and semi-official group blogging. There will be a few blog-related scandals during the GE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104442</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104442</guid>
		<description>1) Vote share up, number of seats slightly down -- Labour would need to be doing significantly worse than they are to lose enough marginals.
2) Very well. If the debates don&#039;t get nixed by the Plaidies and the Scottish Nats, he&#039;ll come out on top.
3) No idea. I don&#039;t live in England.
4) I don&#039;t see a hung parliament happening, but if it did, I suspect it would be 1974 all over again: the coalition talks would fail and there&#039;d be a second election.
5) No idea.
6) No.
7) Yes. The Tories are going to have tough decisions to make and Labour will be in disarray.
8) Scotland: no idea. Wales, it&#039;ll be four seats again, but not necessarily the same ones: Cardiff Central is rock solid; Montgomery should be, were it not for the incumbent MP doing his best to create a negative personal vote; I don&#039;t believe the opinion polls on how marginal Brecon &amp; Radnor is, but I could be wrong; and the student vote in Aberystwyth will be key as to which way Ceredigion goes (and this time Iraq&#039;s less of an issue); but Swansea West and Newport East might be pick-ups.
9) Hopefully she&#039;ll keep her mouth shut. And membership should increase.
10) Charlotte Gore. No, seriously: there&#039;s my wild prediction for 2010 -- she&#039;ll be back. And I doubt the blogs will impact much on the election unless someone does something very stupid indeed and then takes out an injunction against the press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Vote share up, number of seats slightly down &#8212; Labour would need to be doing significantly worse than they are to lose enough marginals.<br />
2) Very well. If the debates don&#8217;t get nixed by the Plaidies and the Scottish Nats, he&#8217;ll come out on top.<br />
3) No idea. I don&#8217;t live in England.<br />
4) I don&#8217;t see a hung parliament happening, but if it did, I suspect it would be 1974 all over again: the coalition talks would fail and there&#8217;d be a second election.<br />
5) No idea.<br />
6) No.<br />
7) Yes. The Tories are going to have tough decisions to make and Labour will be in disarray.<br />
 <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Scotland: no idea. Wales, it&#8217;ll be four seats again, but not necessarily the same ones: Cardiff Central is rock solid; Montgomery should be, were it not for the incumbent MP doing his best to create a negative personal vote; I don&#8217;t believe the opinion polls on how marginal Brecon &amp; Radnor is, but I could be wrong; and the student vote in Aberystwyth will be key as to which way Ceredigion goes (and this time Iraq&#8217;s less of an issue); but Swansea West and Newport East might be pick-ups.<br />
9) Hopefully she&#8217;ll keep her mouth shut. And membership should increase.<br />
10) Charlotte Gore. No, seriously: there&#8217;s my wild prediction for 2010 &#8212; she&#8217;ll be back. And I doubt the blogs will impact much on the election unless someone does something very stupid indeed and then takes out an injunction against the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104425</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104425</guid>
		<description>1. Few enough that people will be disappointed by the performance, unjustly given that we were theoretically on zero UNS seats two years ago. Labour seats will be resilient in cases where we aren&#039;t a few points away, and some seats will suffer from thinner resources. I think around 50. Vote percentage will be above 20%, below 23%.

2. Perform good. But Vince will get as much air time, so idiots familiar with Blair-style autocratic leadership will call him &quot;passionate but weak&quot;. Debate good, as long as he sets out clear turquoise water and turns it into Lib Dems v LabCon.

3. Lib Dems 2nd. Labour 3rd. This will be the last strong performance for the Conservatives, unless the general election is later than 6 May, and by the same token, the last blow against a Labour party saddled with Brown or bereft of permanent leadership.

4. They will support Conservatives in a minority administration, until the Osborne Budget, which the Parliamentary leadership will say it cannot support. Either that, or there will be major concessions to the Lib Dem side on tax progressivity, etc. There is no middle ground.

5. Assuming here a workable majority for DC (this hung parliament talk is completely unjustified IMO). Lib Dems will use the fact that we have a visible leadership to try to lead opposition to Cam and the Camcepticons. It&#039;ll work until Labour settles on an electable leader, but FPTP will prevent public popularity transforming into major medium-term electoral success. Resources are likely to be directed towards 10-15 seats lost to the blue tide, so we can take advantage of government unpopularity.

6. No. Not because of any extraordinary loyalty on our side, but because the Montgomerie tendency would scream blue murder and ZANU-DC and SDP EUSSR sellouts.

7. Yes, as the Labour leadership takes time to bed in, while the Conservatives are forced to implement unpopular policies.

8. No; we will lose seats and votes in the regions.

9. I&#039;m not well-informed enough to speak of Scott. And membership will decline, but it will do the same in all parties (including UKIP/GPEW/BNP).

10. I certainly hope blogs don&#039;t grow &lt;b&gt;during&lt;/b&gt; the election campaign! There are better uses of time than starting a blog in such heady days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Few enough that people will be disappointed by the performance, unjustly given that we were theoretically on zero UNS seats two years ago. Labour seats will be resilient in cases where we aren&#8217;t a few points away, and some seats will suffer from thinner resources. I think around 50. Vote percentage will be above 20%, below 23%.</p>
<p>2. Perform good. But Vince will get as much air time, so idiots familiar with Blair-style autocratic leadership will call him &#8220;passionate but weak&#8221;. Debate good, as long as he sets out clear turquoise water and turns it into Lib Dems v LabCon.</p>
<p>3. Lib Dems 2nd. Labour 3rd. This will be the last strong performance for the Conservatives, unless the general election is later than 6 May, and by the same token, the last blow against a Labour party saddled with Brown or bereft of permanent leadership.</p>
<p>4. They will support Conservatives in a minority administration, until the Osborne Budget, which the Parliamentary leadership will say it cannot support. Either that, or there will be major concessions to the Lib Dem side on tax progressivity, etc. There is no middle ground.</p>
<p>5. Assuming here a workable majority for DC (this hung parliament talk is completely unjustified IMO). Lib Dems will use the fact that we have a visible leadership to try to lead opposition to Cam and the Camcepticons. It&#8217;ll work until Labour settles on an electable leader, but FPTP will prevent public popularity transforming into major medium-term electoral success. Resources are likely to be directed towards 10-15 seats lost to the blue tide, so we can take advantage of government unpopularity.</p>
<p>6. No. Not because of any extraordinary loyalty on our side, but because the Montgomerie tendency would scream blue murder and ZANU-DC and SDP EUSSR sellouts.</p>
<p>7. Yes, as the Labour leadership takes time to bed in, while the Conservatives are forced to implement unpopular policies.</p>
<p>8. No; we will lose seats and votes in the regions.</p>
<p>9. I&#8217;m not well-informed enough to speak of Scott. And membership will decline, but it will do the same in all parties (including UKIP/GPEW/BNP).</p>
<p>10. I certainly hope blogs don&#8217;t grow <b>during</b> the election campaign! There are better uses of time than starting a blog in such heady days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104423</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104423</guid>
		<description>1) 65 seats is my guess, provided we fight back in places like the South West and run a good campaign, not only capitalising on the weakest Labour position since 1979 but also, crucially, kicking the Tories into touch on the actual issues.
2) I have every confidence that Clegg will hold his own in every debate, presenting a likable and intelligent alternative to the other two. At the very least, he&#039;ll be able to deliver a good kicking to Cameron. It&#039;s unknowable if he&#039;ll stand up to the pressure of the campaign, but every sign shows he will.
3) We&#039;ll advance in councillors, no doubt about that.
4) We&#039;ll take every vote as they come, and force the minority Tory goverment to work extremely hard. We&#039;ll urge that we will not form a coalition government unless a PR election is held first.
5) The same as always - push our own politics. Hopefully Cameron will help dig his own grave.
6) Hell no. They&#039;re not stupid.
7) They&#039;ll hold firm, provided Cameron doesn&#039;t flunk. If Cameron flunks, we&#039;ll get 25%.
8) Ceredigion will stay yellow if I have to knock on every door myself. We&#039;ll get Newport East and hold our other strongholds with comfortable majorites. Scotland depends on the SNP and I can&#039;t claim any knowledge on Scottish politcs.
9) Hopefully!
10) The internet can choose the Christmas number one. It can pick winners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) 65 seats is my guess, provided we fight back in places like the South West and run a good campaign, not only capitalising on the weakest Labour position since 1979 but also, crucially, kicking the Tories into touch on the actual issues.<br />
2) I have every confidence that Clegg will hold his own in every debate, presenting a likable and intelligent alternative to the other two. At the very least, he&#8217;ll be able to deliver a good kicking to Cameron. It&#8217;s unknowable if he&#8217;ll stand up to the pressure of the campaign, but every sign shows he will.<br />
3) We&#8217;ll advance in councillors, no doubt about that.<br />
4) We&#8217;ll take every vote as they come, and force the minority Tory goverment to work extremely hard. We&#8217;ll urge that we will not form a coalition government unless a PR election is held first.<br />
5) The same as always &#8211; push our own politics. Hopefully Cameron will help dig his own grave.<br />
6) Hell no. They&#8217;re not stupid.<br />
7) They&#8217;ll hold firm, provided Cameron doesn&#8217;t flunk. If Cameron flunks, we&#8217;ll get 25%.<br />
 <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> Ceredigion will stay yellow if I have to knock on every door myself. We&#8217;ll get Newport East and hold our other strongholds with comfortable majorites. Scotland depends on the SNP and I can&#8217;t claim any knowledge on Scottish politcs.<br />
9) Hopefully!<br />
10) The internet can choose the Christmas number one. It can pick winners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104420</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104420</guid>
		<description>1. 48 seats (20 losses to the Tories and 5 gains from Labour) Percentage of the vote: 20%

2. Well. He also will have been judged to have &quot;won&quot; at least one debate. 

3. I&#039;ve no idea.

4.  I wouldn&#039;t rule out either a limited Lib-Con &quot;pact&quot; (maybe with a royal commission into local government powers) or staying totally independent on the opposition benches. A formal coalition will just not happen, not after the first general election in 2010 anyway ;-)  

5. The political battle-lines will be quickly drawn over the Tory&#039;s emergency budget, with Nick building on his increased profile &amp; credibility he has accumulated during the campaign, and Vince leading the charge in the Commons against &quot;outrageous Tory cuts&quot;.  Labour will be in disarray and our poll ratings will rise at their expense.

6. No, unless it&#039;s a non-political post. 

7. Yes by around 4 points.

8. Scotland and Wales will remain broadly the same, -/+ one or two. 

9. No idea.

10. A major gaffe by at least one candidate will tip the balance in that seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. 48 seats (20 losses to the Tories and 5 gains from Labour) Percentage of the vote: 20%</p>
<p>2. Well. He also will have been judged to have &#8220;won&#8221; at least one debate. </p>
<p>3. I&#8217;ve no idea.</p>
<p>4.  I wouldn&#8217;t rule out either a limited Lib-Con &#8220;pact&#8221; (maybe with a royal commission into local government powers) or staying totally independent on the opposition benches. A formal coalition will just not happen, not after the first general election in 2010 anyway <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>5. The political battle-lines will be quickly drawn over the Tory&#8217;s emergency budget, with Nick building on his increased profile &amp; credibility he has accumulated during the campaign, and Vince leading the charge in the Commons against &#8220;outrageous Tory cuts&#8221;.  Labour will be in disarray and our poll ratings will rise at their expense.</p>
<p>6. No, unless it&#8217;s a non-political post. </p>
<p>7. Yes by around 4 points.</p>
<p>8. Scotland and Wales will remain broadly the same, -/+ one or two. </p>
<p>9. No idea.</p>
<p>10. A major gaffe by at least one candidate will tip the balance in that seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Land</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/10-key-lib-dem-questions-for-2010-17386.html#comment-104418</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17386#comment-104418</guid>
		<description>1. A few losses to the Cons; gains from Labour. 55-65?
2. He will do well. Hopefully he will show he is no media robot like Cameron and show he cares, losing uis rag once or twice.
3. We will make good gains from Labour, and, perhaps surprisingly to many, from the Conservatives in their homelands.
4. Let&#039;s have the confidence to leave this to Nick.
5. A very good question...
6. If the party leadership is happy for them to do so.
7. Yes.
8. Scotland: No. Wales: Yes - or do even better!
9. Ros Scott: Well if no one else challenges her, I will. Membership: up 10%.
10. The gaffe is the most likely outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. A few losses to the Cons; gains from Labour. 55-65?<br />
2. He will do well. Hopefully he will show he is no media robot like Cameron and show he cares, losing uis rag once or twice.<br />
3. We will make good gains from Labour, and, perhaps surprisingly to many, from the Conservatives in their homelands.<br />
4. Let&#8217;s have the confidence to leave this to Nick.<br />
5. A very good question&#8230;<br />
6. If the party leadership is happy for them to do so.<br />
7. Yes.<br />
8. Scotland: No. Wales: Yes &#8211; or do even better!<br />
9. Ros Scott: Well if no one else challenges her, I will. Membership: up 10%.<br />
10. The gaffe is the most likely outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

