3 to see: Lib Dem #GE2010 campaign coverage (9/4/10)

Pushed for time, but want to keep up-to-date with how the campaign’s going? Here are today’s must-reads ….

Cameron adviser discloses cuts detail (FT.com)
Anyone who heard David Cameron’s BBC Radio 4 Today Programme interview today will have heard him squirming when asked to confirm the report in the Financial Times today that the Tories’ tax-cuts could lead to the loss of 40,000 jobs.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Sir Peter Gershon, the former government adviser who has provided the blueprint for the Conservative leader’s efficiency plans, disclosed for the first time how the party’s proposed £12bn savings should be achieved. …

The projected saving implies that at least 20,000 to 40,000 public sector jobs would go during the next 12 months, said experts. … The Tories have consistently refused to disclose how they would make the planned savings.

As Vince Cable has commented:

It is fast becoming clear what Tory efficiency savings actually mean. Claiming that they are the party that will support jobs is entirely undermined when their efficiency chief is looking to immediately slash employment throughout the public sector. The Tories are guilty of the worst type of salami slicing – cutting with no regard for what is useful or wasteful spending.”

Has Calamity Chris been cast into the cold? (Daily Mail)

Another top Tory goes Missing in Action. First it was George Osborne, shunted into the sidelines in case he reminds voters that he might actually run the economy in four weeks time. And now the Tories’ shadow home secretary has been exiled after a string of gaffes left him looking a liability.

Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, has been sent into exile for suggesting it is fine for Christian owners of Bed & Breakfasts to turn away gay couples. … Calamity Chris was already on trial after being criticised early this year by the head of the UK Statistics Authority when he claimed that figures for violent crime had soared – a claim the authority said was ‘likely to mislead the public’.

He gaffed again when he compared life in British inner cities to the American TV series The Wire, set in Baltimore, where the crime rate is far higher. He put his foot in his mouth once more when he took great delight in scorning as a ‘political gimmick’ the appointment of the former Army chief General Sir Richard Dannatt as a defence advisor to Labour – only to discover that it was actually Cameron who had made the appointment and the Tories that Dannatt was advising.

Exactly what does it say about the weakness of the top Tory team that two of their most senior shadow cabinet members are relegated as far out of sight as possible?

Michael Savage: Does Paxman have a Lib-Dem blind spot? (Independent)

Too big for his boots? Or just lazily groping for the cheap laugh? Either way the Independent puts BBC2 Newsnight’s chief anchor Jeremy Paxman under the spotlight for ignoring and dismissing the Lib Dems by turn:

Next to sit in Paxman’s blind spot was Jeremy Browne, a Treasury spokesman. As Paxo refereed the battle between Ed Miliband and Philip Hammond, Mr Browne sat just out of shot. Four minutes in and he was given his moment. “It’s important what the Lib Dem position is on all these matters,” the presenter quipped, his words dripping with sarcasm. Mr Browne’s agreement provoked a clarification from the host: “That was a joke.”

The Representation of the People Act may have kicked-in, guaranteeing the Lib Dems a slice of the media spotlight. But old habits die hard, and the BBC are much more comfortable pretending it’s still the 1950s, and that this is a two-party election.

They’d do well to remember that in half the country at this election the battle is not between Labour and Tory – and in almost all of them, it’s the Lib Dems who are either the incumbents or the challengers.

These are the three pieces which caught my eye – seen or heard anything else in today’s media to draw LDV readers’ attention to? Let us know in the comments thread.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in General Election.

One Comment

  • I contacted the Lib. Dem prospective Parliamentary candidate (twice ), along with the contenders from the other two main parties, in February to ascertain his view on Assisted Suicide. Unlike the Lab. & Con. PPCs, he did not bother to reply. How should I interpret this?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGraham Evans 27th Apr - 3:42pm
    The problem with all forms of taxation which are not linked to specific types of expenditure is that every interest group will claim that their...
  • User AvatarThomas 27th Apr - 3:03pm
    Why not this one? http://www.libdemvoice.org/property-uplift-recovery-tax-54023.html Inheritance tax must be heavily skewed towards the rich, especially those with inherited wealth Duke of Westminster, or it would...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 27th Apr - 2:59pm
    'Ode to Joy the anthem of Europe!' I have it as my ringtone on my mobile.
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 27th Apr - 2:47pm
    The problem with the reformed state pension is that it is still far to low for anyone to reasonably live off. Even more so if...
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 27th Apr - 2:32pm
    A warning from the Guardian today on the Lib Dems having too much of a focus on Remain voters: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/27/lib-dems-shouldnt-count-on-remain-votes-the-data-looks-bleak
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 27th Apr - 2:31pm
    If we understand how money works we have a better appreciation of why taxes are levied. From the POV of the currency issuer, spending has...