The Independent View: Hope yet for parity esteem for mental health issues

Mihir Magudia is Head of Strategy & Public Affairs for St Andrew’s Healthcare, the UK’s largest mental health charity that provides more services to the NHS than any other charity. On his blog, Spotlight, he praises Norman Lamb for signalling “parity of esteem” between mental health and physical health treatment at a recent conference:

…Norman Lamb went further than his predecessors. After rightly pointing out that people with mental health problems suffer from an institutional disadvantage in the health system (mentioning how they have been ignored by the reforms on waiting times, choice and payment by results) he went on to call for something very specific.

A statutory entitlement for people with mental health services to access services on exactly the same terms as people with physical health problems.

Now on first glance, this might seem obvious, but for anyone familiar with mental health services, this would be a huge step forward:

From people in prison or living homeless on the streets to people suffering from mild depression and anxiety, there are huge problems in accessing services and huge delays which worsen people’s mental health conditions.

Norman Lamb’s suggestion, if implemented, would revolutionise services for people with mental health problems and ought to betaken up as government policy. It’s a shame that it’s not (yet), but I understand from early indications about the forthcoming NHS Mandate, that there will be hardly a page where mental health does not feature and there is an emphasis on access to genuine choice for patients and service users.

I don’t know when or if we’ll get to genuine equality between mental and physical health, but the speech I heard today makes me far more hopeful that that day will actually come.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31467 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • Am I alone in hating the use of the word “issues” when someone really means “problems” or “difficulties”? An issue is a topic or subject for discussion but unfortunately it has crept into usage as a euphemism for people who don’t like to call a problem a problem. It’s a sloppy American import and I loathe it.

    Sorry but I’m a pedant and a proud one at that.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 25th Oct - 4:58pm
    One of the obvious conclusions is that the approach that Paddy and his friends and the EU was keen to push didn't actually address the...
  • User AvatarGF 25th Oct - 4:53pm
    Paul in Wokingham says, "And I have little idea of what Liberal Democrats stand for. We have this anodyne message about fairer/stronger economy/society that means...
  • User AvatarPeter Andrews 25th Oct - 4:44pm
    I want regional devolution not piece meal devolution to City regions on demand which will just cause multiple 'West Lothian questions'
  • User AvatarRC 25th Oct - 4:41pm
    Another word of caution about devolution. It is likely to make even clearer than before the fact that some regions, in particularly London and the...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 25th Oct - 4:34pm
    Two main points: 1. Liberals should not allow the world to descend into violent anarchy. We need to work with our allies to do our...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 25th Oct - 4:29pm
    So no seats to defend, so no losses possible. However, the headline has to be "No losses." Is it necessary to hide the facts behind...