Nick Clegg announces the arrangements for flexible parental leave

Another radical Lib Dem proposal is being implemented today as Nick Clegg announces the arrangements for flexible parental leave.

In essence, parents of new babies will be entitled to a year’s worth of parental leave that they can share between themselves to suit their own circumstances. He says:

From 2015, the UK will shift to an entirely new system of flexible parental leave. Under the new rules, a mother will be able to trigger flexible leave at any point – if and when she feels ready. That means that whatever time is left to run on her original year can be taken by her partner instead. Or they can chop up the remaining time between them – taking it in turns. Or they can take time off together – whatever suits them. The only rule is that no more than 12 months can be taken in total; with no more than 9 months at guaranteed pay. And, of course, couples will need to be open with their employers, giving them proper notice.

Decent maternity leave has long been a policy of the Lib Dems. In more recent years we have championed the rights of fathers to be able to share effectively in parenting.

We have come a long way from the maternity arrangements that were in place in the past.  When I had my first child in 1974 the only option I was offered by my employer (now a University) was six weeks leave, after which I had to return to full-time work. My husband had no right to take any leave at all, not even for the birth.

Since then a combination of statutory entitlements, family-friendly contracts and a noticeable change in public attitudes towards parenting have had a marked impact on family life. These latest arrangements go yet further and will ensure that children are given the best start in life, that mothers can plan their career paths, that fathers can spend more time caring for their children, and that employers can benefit from increased loyalty from their staff.

* Mary Reid is the Monday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • Matthew Huntbach 13th Nov '12 - 9:49pm

    From 2015, the UK will shift to an entirely new system of flexible parental leave. Under the new rules, a mother will be able to trigger flexible leave at any point

    And then get sacked due to having been employed in her current post for under two years or working for one of these “we’ll call you a shareholder so we can sack you without question” companies. Please don;t give any c**p about any sort of legal protection for parental leave, they might not SAY they’re sacking you for the temerity of asking for it, but who can afford and risk the legal fight to prove it? You want to end the right of protection against unfair dismissal – that’s what it means – they can dismiss you for any reason they like without having to justify it.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStuart 28th Nov - 6:17pm
    @Joe Otten That expectation seems to be held mostly by people like those who campaigned to have Tara Hudson moved "for her safety". Actually, though...
  • User AvatarJohn Grout 28th Nov - 5:53pm
    Well said, Caron. My main concern is that there doesn't seem to be very much substantive progress on a concrete plan for what to do...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 28th Nov - 4:57pm
    There seems to be an expectation here that women don't commit violent crimes, or that women who do have somehow unsexed themselves (to borrow Lady...
  • User AvatarColin Rosenstiel 28th Nov - 4:53pm
    Sorry, but Oldham isn't even close. Cambridge has had 13 byelections since the Reform Act 1832: 1834, 1839. 1840, 1843, 1845, 1854, 1863, 1866, 1917,...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 28th Nov - 4:47pm
    expats, maybe it was the same experts, but I'm only referring to the ones at the think tanks and on Twitter. Haven't had a look-in...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 28th Nov - 4:40pm
    well done to Liz for raising this. But to say " It’s not difficult" is clearly wrong.There has to be an effective process for dealing...