380 Conservative candidates go missing

And then they were mostly found again; thanks to the person who pointed out the reason for the bulk of the difference in the comments. I think the few who are still missing are best not fussed over 🙂

A little while back the Conservatives boasted about the number of candidates they were standing in the local elections. This story is no longer on their website as this link shows though thanks to Iain Dale we can all still read the numbers.

Why might you want to read the numbers? Well, the (independent) Press Association has now added up the number of candidates from each party and the Conservative total in England is actually 380 fewer than they claimed (8,884 compared with 9,264).

Oops.

P.S. If this was the Liberal Democrats, I am sure you can imagine the frothing at the mouth indignation on Conservative blogs about lies, dodgy statistics, gutter politics, shoddy cover-ups and predictable mud-slinging. But I’m a nice chap, so I won’t froth. But feel free to froth on your own.

P.P.S. Boring technical bits: some variation in the figures is to be expected because of some late withdrawls that may have happened after the Conservative figures were published and, having double-checked the breakdown of the figures, I am comparing England with England. It’s not a matter of one set including Scotland and the other not.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • The Conservative’s own figure is the total of all their English regional figures whilst the PA figure is their UK total minus their Scottish total.

    i.e. they are both England only figures.

  • Not a supporter 23rd Apr '07 - 7:53pm

    Or could the 380 be those who have already been returned unopposed, and so are no longer candidates?

    In which case, that would be egg on your face, I presume?

  • I prefer my eggs scrambled. I’ll go ready a frying pan.

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Apr '07 - 8:10pm

    The PA figures say 365 Tories returned unopposed so that still doesn’t quite add up.

    Plus it would be odd to refer to candidate totals as not including those returned unopposed.

  • Hywel Morgan 23rd Apr '07 - 8:11pm

    OK so PA are being odd by the looks of it!

  • It's atwo-horse race 23rd Apr '07 - 9:59pm

    Maybe, just maybe, this story is true – I don’t know. But Conservatives are contesting 88% of seats up for grabs Vs. 64% for the Lib Dems. Why the shortage?

    People in glass houses…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    This is where Coalition comes in. Sure, you didn't make a lot of centre-left voters very happy by backing the Conservatives, but more importantly you went into ...
  • FS People
    Expats If we are being “fair to the police” we need full facts: A neighbour called 999 saying someone had been stabbed, The brothers call contains signif...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Peter Davies, " you don’t really own anything unless you have the option to consume it" ??? I'm struggling to understand this. Am I missin...
  • expats
    David Raw 8th Jun '26 - 6:27pm..“After all George Formby paid 19/6d in the £ on his income and still remained the greatest entertainer ever”. David, the...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Kira, I asked Google's AI two questions: "is government spending higher per person in Scotland than England?" Ans: Public spending per pe...