Improving election counts: good moves from the Electoral Commission

Earlier this week I went to meet with the Electoral Commission to discuss their plans for encouraging better practice at election counts. Having spotted my views, they invited me thinking I might be interested in their plans – and kudos to the Electoral Commission for willing to talk in this way.

The plans are still in draft and subject to consultation, so I won’t go in to details about them now, but the overall move is towards having a recommended set of count procedures and accompanying forms which are (a) a big improvement on the current situation, (b) produce more accurate counts via more cross-checking at intermediate stages and (c) provide more information to candidates and agents to both keep them informed and help them query matters which should be queried.

The news all sounded very positive. Fingers crossed…

Share:
This entry was posted in Election law, News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16792 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Comments

  • Posted 14th November 2009 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    “more information to candidates and agents to both keep them informed and help them query matters which should be queried.”

    This is absolutely crucial. It should be a requirement that agents are shown the verification statement (and allowed to copy it) as soon as verification has been completed.

  • Martin Land
    Posted 14th November 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    As I’ve said before Mark, my biggest concern remains the differential in the degree of seriousness with which RO’s, ERO’s and their staff take Town and Parish Council elections. Recounts are rare, even when results are very close, especially when tally sheets have been used. The Electoral Commission should be looking at separate counts, perhaps a day or two later.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?