BBC Question Time: open thread

Julia Goldsworthy, the Lib Dem shadow secretary of state for communities and local government, is one of the panellists on tonight’s Question Time (broadcast on BBC1 and online from 10.35 pm GMT).

She’ll be alongside the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport Andy Burnham, the Conservative shadow secretary of State for work and pensions Chris Grayling, the director of Liberty Shami Chakrabarti and entrepreneur Duncan Bannatyne from BBC Two’s Dragons’ Den.

Damn the BBC… just days after I cynically queried whether Auntie would ever put up a liberal commentator alongside a Lib Dem MP they do precisely that. And not just any liberal commentator, but Shami, LDV’s Liberal Voice of the Year. Bah.

However, putting the often aggrieved feelings of Lib Dems at sometimes being excluded from QT to one side, LDV research to be published tomorrow will show there is a definite pro-Tory bias in the BBC’s choice of panellists. Click back tomorrow to see the stats.

Anyway, if you’re watching tonight’s show, and want to sound-off, please feel free to use the comments thread.

Share:
This entry was posted in Lib Dem TV and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/2134 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

44 Comments

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Oh no. Shami Chakrabarti. Will tonight be the night I lose all of my remaining Liberal Democrat friends? Both of them?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    No, he’s wrong. Next question.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:39 pm | Permalink

    100% for Grayling.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    A mealy-mouthed answer from Shami, and no clear condemnation of the Archbishop’s remarks. Shami, you are rapidly going down in my estimation, and you were already at rock bottom.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Shami tells us that she and her colleagues are is very busy representing a girl who wants to wear a bangle. Methinks you’re wasting your time darling.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    90% for Burnham.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    And yes, good point from the audience. Nobody elected the bearded idiot, so maybe he should just take a jump.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    And a good answer by Julia :)

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    OK, am I the only one here thinking that Julia represents the “Predator” from the final scene where he takes off his clothes in front of Arnie?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, make that 31% for Burnham.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Moronic Jesus-freak has his say from the audience.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Why have the BBC stopped showing this online? If this carries on, I might have to buy a television :-(

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Thought for the day: why on earth does anyone think that an “Islamic mortgage” does not simply amount to paying interest by another route.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Rob, it may be online later on, probably on the I-player

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    What exactly is Julia wearing?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    God, it’s the predator again. I’m hiding under the duvet.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:53 pm | Permalink
  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Why all this fuss over bugging MP’s? Are they afraid that they might be caught saying something useful for a change?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    they’re afraid they might be caught stealing more money from the tax payers :P

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    Well said Duncan. There is absolutely nothing wrong with bugging a suspected terrorist fund-raiser.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    It wasn’t a surgery Andy. You don’t hold surgeries in the clink.

  • JohnM
    Posted 7th February 2008 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Is the Labour guy wearing eye shadow?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Gentleman from the audience doesn’t seem to be able to make a distinction between somebody who is standing for trial, and somebody who has been convicted.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    Spot on Andy. I’ve just had the lead nicked off my roof. More CCTV please, not less.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    . . . and if Julia thinks there is too much CCTV, then maybe she’d like to come and fix up my roof.

    Though perhaps have a change of clothes first love.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Audience member is spot on. The “surveillance society” protects our liberties far more that it threatens them.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    I’m afraid from now on, I’m killing the sound when Shami speaks. It’s just too annoying for words . . .

  • Patrick Murray
    Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    julia goldsworthy- spot on with the housing situation.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    . . . and I’m killing the video for Julia.

  • Patrick Murray
    Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    you feeling alright this evening?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    Nice lady from the audience articulates the problem over housing and benefits very well.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    Me? I’m fine. Laptop in one hand, bottle of Cobra in the other. Only thing missing is a beautiful woman really.

  • Justin Hinchcliffe (Conservative supporter)
    Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    I wanted to agree with Shami but she let me down. She waffled on and was, at times, out of her depth. Julia – OK (nothing special). Burnham’s a good communicator, however wrong. Star of the show, so far, Grayling. It’s difficult to see how any liberal could dislike or disagree with Chris Grayling.

    I suspect Laurence has had too much coffee this evening (-:

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    As a matter of interest, do the Liberal Democrats have an emergency wardrobe fund? Perhaps we should.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    That audience member was so lovely, that I almost wanted to agree with her. But I’m afraid I just don’t want a vote over a treaty I’m not going to read.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    “Why can’t we have some grown-up politics in this country?” asks Grayling.

    Where do I start . . . ?

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    I’m sorry to say that Afghanistan is lost. Time to get out.

  • Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Great venue. Great show. Nice one David.

  • Bridget Fox
    Posted 7th February 2008 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    I’m sorry that I missed the Laurence Boyce show as I was speaking at an anti Heathrow expansion meeting in Highbury. I did just get home in time for the thankyous. Is Andy Burnham wearing falsies? If he loses his seat he could replace Penelope Cruz on the mascara contract.

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 8th February 2008 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    Why not have Laurence live-blogging on QT next week :-)

  • Richard
    Posted 8th February 2008 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    “why on earth does anyone think that an “Islamic mortgage” does not simply amount to paying interest by another route.”

    Because the risk situation is different in an Islamic mortgage than a conventional one.

    The bank takes on more of the risk in a hire-purchase agreement (like an Islamic mortgage) than they do in a straight loan, as the outstanding debt is only secured against a percentage of the value of the property, rather than against the whole.

  • David Morton
    Posted 8th February 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    When I saw 41 posts on this thread I thought the show had been an epic battle between light and dark. yet its seems laurence has just been on the cooking sherry.

    Perhaps next time we gifted with two liberal voices on QT the party should send Mr Boyce?

  • Posted 8th February 2008 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    “I’m Laurence Boyce!”

    Sorry, thought it was compulsory ;-)

    While both of last night’s ‘Liberal Voices’ were disappointing, top marks to Susan Kramer on Any Questions tonight – very sound on Rowan Williams’ mealy-mouthed attack on the Rule of Law, and just now she’s got the best response I’ve ever heard for a Lib Dem on a programme like this, aided by a very anti-Heathrow local audience!

    I suspect if she’d cried ‘Burn him!’ when the Minister opened his mouth to follow her, they’d have risen up as one and built a giant wicker jumbo jet.

  • Tony Greaves
    Posted 31st May 2008 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Can’t we just ban this rubbish?

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?