<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A look back at the polls: December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David McEwan Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-37005</link>
		<dc:creator>David McEwan Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-37005</guid>
		<description>All very well but Nichol Steven is doing a one man job of destroying the LibDems in Scotland,and his number two Tavish Scott is seriously illiberal and wont do any better. The LibDems have been polling in single figures in some polls in Scotland recently. The assasination of Charles didn&#039;t help much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very well but Nichol Steven is doing a one man job of destroying the LibDems in Scotland,and his number two Tavish Scott is seriously illiberal and wont do any better. The LibDems have been polling in single figures in some polls in Scotland recently. The assasination of Charles didn&#8217;t help much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36982</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36982</guid>
		<description>&quot;Finally, as a Christmas treat, here are the previous December poll averages for the parties over the past decade:&quot;

The sad thing is that it &lt;B&gt;was&lt;/B&gt; a Christmas treat for me! Thanks and compliments of the season!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finally, as a Christmas treat, here are the previous December poll averages for the parties over the past decade:&#8221;</p>
<p>The sad thing is that it <b>was</b> a Christmas treat for me! Thanks and compliments of the season!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36951</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36951</guid>
		<description>What was the picture the last time May&#039;s local election seats were up for grabs? I guess I am asking: which parties will be fighting from a high base (with much to defend) and which from a low base (with much to gain)? Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was the picture the last time May&#8217;s local election seats were up for grabs? I guess I am asking: which parties will be fighting from a high base (with much to defend) and which from a low base (with much to gain)? Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloy Plopwell</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36947</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloy Plopwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36947</guid>
		<description>Apsolutely right. We have avoided the kind of collapse we had into single figures when the liberal sdp Alliance broke up after 1987. We have stupendous momentum and are raring to go, because those of us on the ground think we can win a lot of seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apsolutely right. We have avoided the kind of collapse we had into single figures when the liberal sdp Alliance broke up after 1987. We have stupendous momentum and are raring to go, because those of us on the ground think we can win a lot of seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Ashton</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36936</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-look-back-at-the-polls-december-1880.html#comment-36936</guid>
		<description>Eh, lad 16% is luxury. Back in the late &#039;70s we were on 4%, came 4th behind the National Front in by-elections, and David Steel would beat us to death with rolled up copies of the manifesto :-)

Seriously though, the interesting thing is despite Labour having a really bad time of things the Tories are still &#039;only&#039; on 42%. If Cameron was going to win the next election the Tories should be over 50% by now, given the general tendency for a swing back to the Government in the heat of an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, lad 16% is luxury. Back in the late &#8217;70s we were on 4%, came 4th behind the National Front in by-elections, and David Steel would beat us to death with rolled up copies of the manifesto <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously though, the interesting thing is despite Labour having a really bad time of things the Tories are still &#8216;only&#8217; on 42%. If Cameron was going to win the next election the Tories should be over 50% by now, given the general tendency for a swing back to the Government in the heat of an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

