A tailored response is required to tackle cities’ unemployment challenges

Today, Centre for Cities launches Cities Outlook 2012, our fifth annual ‘health check’ on UK cities, and this year we have focused on unemployment in cities.

The report, sponsored by IBM and the LGA, shows that there is a strong geographical nature to unemployment across UK cities. But unemployment is not evenly spread across the UK. While cities such as York and Cambridge have relatively low levels of unemployment, cities such as Grimsby and Hull have a much larger problem.

The variation in unemployment across cities is stark. While the number of people in Cambridge claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) is just 1.8 percent of the total working age population, 8.0 percent of residents in Hull are on JSA. And the gap between the two cities has more than doubled since the onset of the recession; it has widened from 3.1 percentage points in February 2008 to 6.2 percentage points in November 2011.

Similar patterns are seen for youth and long term unemployment. There are around one in ten young job seekers in Grimsby compared to less than one in 30 in York. And one in four job seekers in Hull has been unemployed for over one year in contrast to one in ten in Swansea. These trends could have worrying consequences – previous research has shown the long term ‘scarring’ effects that youth and long term unemployment can have on future employment prospects.

The concentration of unemployment in some cities requires a varied geographic approach to tackle the different unemployment challenges that cities face. But to date, the Government’s approach has been spatially blind; while the Youth Contract that was announced by Nick Clegg in November is welcomed, it has ignored geography as a key dimension of the unemployment problem.

The Government has signalled its strong intention over the last year to devolve power away from Whitehall to cities, and its announcement of ‘city deals’ is a key part of this. Policies to tackle unemployment must be a core part of these deals. The nature of helping someone find employment in Hull is likely to be very different to what it is in Portsmouth. As such, a more tailored response is required to each city’s unemployment problem ranging from short term solutions, such as work experience, to longer term programmes to improve residents’ skills, if policies designed to reduce unemployment are to be effective.

* Paul Swinney is Economist at the Centre for Cities

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/26742 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • This is an excellent report, but Nick Clegg is right to set up “spatially blind” youth policies. We cannot neglect the young unemployed in York just because there are fewer of them. Policy must concentrate on people, not place.

  • Unemployment in construction is 21.2%, I wish these guys would tell the truth. We all need to education ourself in this tough market only way is a degree or change your career.. search online for High Speed Universities for career advice

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarstuart moran 27th Feb - 10:36pm
    so the answer is yes it does........thanks for agreeing (I am not sure what %age has to do with it.....) and then you increase vat...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 27th Feb - 10:33pm
    @stuart moran "Don’t the IFS also say that increasing the tax threshold (a Lib Dem success) also benefit higher tax payers more…..in a similar fashion?"...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 27th Feb - 10:16pm
    @Stuart "To be honest, ever since the memorable thread where Simon argued that the Lib Dems who voted to treble fees had actually KEPT their...
  • User Avatarstuart moran 27th Feb - 10:13pm
    Don't the IFS also say that increasing the tax threshold (a Lib Dem success) also benefit higher tax payers more.....in a similar fashion? I wait...
  • User Avatarstuart moran 27th Feb - 10:10pm
    Simon Shaw Do you oppose the increase to the tax threshold as that benefits the rich more than the poor? The IFS says that too
  • User AvatarStuart 27th Feb - 10:09pm
    @Simon Of course Labour trailed some of the more appealing parts of their policy for maximum impact - I saw it myself on BBC Breakfast...
Fri 27th Feb 2015
Sat 28th Feb 2015
Sun 1st Mar 2015
Mon 2nd Mar 2015
18:30
Wed 4th Mar 2015
Sat 7th Mar 2015
Sun 8th Mar 2015
Wed 11th Mar 2015
Fri 13th Mar 2015
Sat 14th Mar 2015
Wed 18th Mar 2015