An unfortunate triumph for Liberal Democracy? [UPDATED]

As pointed out in the comments on a previous posting, the Liberal Democrats have retained control of two parish councils this week: Bradfield in South Yorkshire and Kidlington in Oxfordshire.

Why “unfortunate”? Well, these two electoral triumphs are due to the hard working local Focus team delivering numerous leaflets with bar charts failure of other parties to put up enough candidates. Right results, but a pair of contested elections would probably have been the better route to it.

UPDATE: Ther are some more councils to add to the list – Abbots Langley Parish Council and also, curiously, Hedge End Town Council. Given that it is in Hampshire (a county that is the scene of many close Liberal Democrat-Conservative Parliamentary contests) I was rather suprised to see that the Conservatives could only find three candidates for the twenty-one seats.

Share:
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/653 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

9 Comments

  • Posted 5th April 2007 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    I was actually slightly misinformed earlier – we’ve had 13 out of 13 candidates elected unopposed in Bradfield, not 11 as previously stated!

    So for the second four-year term running, we’ll have no opposition on the parish whatsoever.
    However, as one of our local party staff says: “Don’t worry – we’ll be providing our own opposition”. ;-)

  • Liberal Neil
    Posted 5th April 2007 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    I agree. We would have preferred a contest across all of Kidlington. Keeps us on our toes.

  • Richard Huzzey
    Posted 5th April 2007 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    2. Amen.

    RH.

  • Dan
    Posted 5th April 2007 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    Just a shame that there are five principal authorities (including a unitary) where the Tories have retained control without a vote being cast…

  • Posted 6th April 2007 at 7:44 am | Permalink

    My brother lives in Bradfield, so I know that the headline should be “Lib Dems sweep to victory in one of England’s largest councils”: Bradfield Parish is enornmous.

  • Hywel
    Posted 6th April 2007 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    “Just a shame that there are five principal authorities (including a unitary) where the Tories have retained control without a vote being cast…”

    Do you mean due to lack of nominations or places with elections by thirds where the seats fall in such a way that there aren’t enough Tory seats up for election for them to mathematically lose control?

  • Tony Hill
    Posted 6th April 2007 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    I have always thought that they had the right idea in Fair Oak (also in the Eastleigh constituency) where for years we have only put up enough Lib Dem candidates to ensure comfortable control, thus ensuring that there is still opposition to keep us on our toes. Internal opposition can be a route to self-destruction.

  • Dan
    Posted 7th April 2007 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    6 – Lack of nominations – see pb.c or Vote 2007 for details…

  • Stephen Robinson
    Posted 11th April 2007 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    And Great Baddow Parish in Chelmsford. The only contested ward has five LDs for the five places plus one UKIP.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?