And lo, with one email Nick Clegg’s opinion poll rating did soar

I was rather puzzled by the Sunday Telegrpah’s report today by Melissa Kite on the standing of party leaders, which claimed that Nick Clegg’s net leader performance rating in polling for PoliticsHome had plummeted since last September. Puzzled because that would be way out of line with what the other polls have been saying.

One email exchange with PoliticsHome later and lo, what was reported as a +5% rating in the most recent polling turns out actually to have been a +15% when then suffered a typo.

At +15% the rating not only compares well to Cameron (+12%) and of course Brown (-33%), but is also pretty much the same as back in September (it was +19 in the three weeks up to 18 September, +13% in the three weeks up to 25 September and +12% in the three weeks up to 2 October).

Now, let’s see what I can do with my next email…

Note: the Telegraph story has now been changed, though by only giving the +19 figure for September, it still suggests a trend which isn’t really there.

UPDATE: PoliticsHome have been back in touch again and told me to disregard their correction of the +5 figure to +15 and +5 is correct after all. The Telegraph is therefore changing its figure back again. Ho hum. This leaves the most recent figure out of line with other polling figures, so let’s see what the next update brings.

UPDATE 2 (9 March): The next update is now here, and Nick Clegg’s rating has indeed bounced back. It’s back to +10.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • Martin Land 21st Feb '10 - 2:22pm

    Now, now, Mark, you are making the assumption that journalists should allow the facts to interfere with a good story.

  • why should i pay somonelse council tax when they are making £20,000 or more profit from the rent of there house. lib dem coments please

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 26th Nov - 3:02am
    Found an English speaking security expert saying what I've been thinking: "the Nusra Front is a wolf in sheep's clothing" and "al-Qaeda is al-Qaeda". Assad,...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 26th Nov - 2:40am
    I tell you what I wouldn't vote for: the strategy that looks the one preferred by English speaking security experts, especially some of the hawks:...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 26th Nov - 12:48am
    The UK is already doing plenty of "heavy lifting" against IS. According to this we had flown the largest number of sorties (up to...
  • User AvatarHoward 26th Nov - 12:45am
    Peter, it is a great pity that the Great British electorate saw fit to vote UKIP at the last EU election. Voting UKIP is a...
  • User AvatarJonathan Brown 26th Nov - 12:21am
    While I'm not hugely convinced by the need for a new group, I very much agree that we ought to deliberately reach out to social...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 25th Nov - 11:53pm
    @John Marriott I think Greenfield may just be pointing out that the priority is to get PR. I agree splitting after would be unnecessary. But...