And the winners in the Power 2010 poll on political reform are…

The polls have closed and over 100,000 votes been counted in the Power 2010  online consultation on political reform (which we’ve previously covered here).

The most popular proposals, with people able to pick more than one from a list, were a proportional voting system, the end of ID cards and government data hoarding, an elected House of Lords, English votes on English laws and a commitment to drawing up a written constitution.

The next stage in Power 2010’s campaign will involve candidates being challenged to back this set of proposals. The campaign’s director, Pam Giddy, says, “The vote shows that voters can make difficult choices about political reform. People have chosen 5 distinct and important reforms, any or all of which would make a major difference to our political system. We’re going to keep up the pressure until election day to make sure the people who want to represent us in parliament take these results seriously and back our campaign for change.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18063 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 24th Feb '10 - 9:29am

    I don’t see how this vote shows anything of the kind. A monkey can push a button.

    It’s a starting point. Whether it will make any difference, remains to be seen.

  • Well 4 out of 5 isn’t bad. There are plenty of think tanks that come out worse.

One Trackback

  • By Power2010 ups its local campaigning | Mark Pack on Sat 13th March 2010 at 7:04 pm.

    […] 10 March 2010 0 comments Tags: News, power2010, tony mcnulty When I covered the results of the Power2010 consultation on what political reforms it should promote, there was a brief discussion on this site and […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 2:53am
    Mr Wallace The evidence I see suggests that it is much harder on smaller parties. Are you telling me that it is not? You have...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 2:45am
    Mr Wallace Do you honestly believe that the Lib Dems would have been more damaged from refusing a coalition than the have been. I believe...
  • User AvatarGlenn 18th Dec - 2:31am
    David Eveershed. I can see the logic of your line of reasoning, but with all due respect if coalition with the Tories has a lot...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 2:30am
    Mr Wallace The reality is however that in a General Election the entire country is choosing between about five or six parties on the question...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 2:26am
    Mr Wallace Matthew, I’m not engaged in a wind-up and I will answer your points. But before I do, just let me say one thing....
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 2:17am
    g I have little faith in political parties these days to change things through themselves, 3rd sector organisations and academia are often much better at...