Another Thursday, more by-election gains

After last week’s splurge of local government gains, this week saw another pair of gains, this time in Kent.

Tim Prater reports;

“Lynne Beaumont was the Councillor for Park ward from 2003-11. the by-elections were held after a Conservative Councillor for Park ward resigned his seats (having not attended a Folkestone Town Council meeting for six months).
 
“The Conservative Shepway District Council have made a number of hugely controversial decisions lately, not least consulting on whether to host the UK high level nuclear waste storage facility (not unsurprisingly, the consultation said no) and introducing on-street parking charges in Folkestone that have been hugely unpopular and massively cut trade for many traders.
 
“Against that backdrop we ran around a six week campaign with a wide range of leaflets, letters, postcards and targeted mail, making it clear that we were best placed to beat the Conservatives and that electing Lynne would send a strong message on Parking to the Conservatives. We had a great team of volunteer deliverers, backed up by an excellent core team during the campaign and on polling day.
 
“Many thanks for the people who helped the campaign (including those who helped with phone canvassing and knock-up), and the people of Folkestone and Park who have indeed sent a strong message to Shepway District Council on Parking!”

The full result in the District Council seat was;

  • Lib Dem (Lynne Beaumont): 461
  • UKIP: 153
  • People First: 200
  • Conservative: 320
  • Labour: 111
  • Green: 29
  • In the Town Council seat, the result was;

  • Lib Dem (Lynne Beaumont): 420
  • UKIP: 152
  • People First: 277
  • Conservative: 263
  • Labour: 117
  • Green: 35
  • Read more by or more about or .
    This entry was posted in News.
    Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31757 for Twitter and emails.
    Advert

    2 Comments

    • paul barker 24th Nov '12 - 3:04pm

      I did a quick look at libdem vote changes last thursday. For seats last contested in may the average change was essentially zero. However the spread was very uneven with twice as many falls as rises & the typical rise twice as large as the typical fall. That would fit with us making net gains but is it because of a change in our behaviour or the voters ?
      Have we been targeting more ruthlessly or are the voters buying into the media narrative (traitors/hated/finished ) until they see us in the flesh ?

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 3:50am
      If Labour wanted a more effective, and much cheaper, reform to higher education policy they would have done well to take up this suggestion from...
    • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 3:38am
      Stuart: You dispute the conclusion that the fee hike has not hit applications by extrapolating from the previous trend, but the difference is too marginal...
    • User AvatarRoland 28th Mar - 2:48am
      @Jack - Firstly a £1m pension pot isn't a particularly big pot (although I accept that it's accrual is a challenge). My understanding is that...
    • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 2:06am
      A typically thorough and high-quality piece of analysis by CentreForum, which fairly highlights some of the more attractive (and voter-friendly) features of the policy as...
    • User AvatarTabman 28th Mar - 1:53am
      Expats: The Thatcher/Major administration fuelled boom and bust whereas this administration reduced the deficit The Thatcher/Major administration enacted Clause 28 whereas this administration enacted gay...
    • User AvatarPsi 28th Mar - 12:35am
      Matt (Bristol) "I am intrigued that you seem to be claiming that you never make a judgement of the morality or quality of other’s actions...
    Sat 28th Mar 2015
    Tue 31st Mar 2015
    Sun 5th Apr 2015
    Sat 11th Apr 2015
    Sun 12th Apr 2015