Another Thursday, more by-election gains

After last week’s splurge of local government gains, this week saw another pair of gains, this time in Kent.

Tim Prater reports;

“Lynne Beaumont was the Councillor for Park ward from 2003-11. the by-elections were held after a Conservative Councillor for Park ward resigned his seats (having not attended a Folkestone Town Council meeting for six months).
 
“The Conservative Shepway District Council have made a number of hugely controversial decisions lately, not least consulting on whether to host the UK high level nuclear waste storage facility (not unsurprisingly, the consultation said no) and introducing on-street parking charges in Folkestone that have been hugely unpopular and massively cut trade for many traders.
 
“Against that backdrop we ran around a six week campaign with a wide range of leaflets, letters, postcards and targeted mail, making it clear that we were best placed to beat the Conservatives and that electing Lynne would send a strong message on Parking to the Conservatives. We had a great team of volunteer deliverers, backed up by an excellent core team during the campaign and on polling day.
 
“Many thanks for the people who helped the campaign (including those who helped with phone canvassing and knock-up), and the people of Folkestone and Park who have indeed sent a strong message to Shepway District Council on Parking!”

The full result in the District Council seat was;

  • Lib Dem (Lynne Beaumont): 461
  • UKIP: 153
  • People First: 200
  • Conservative: 320
  • Labour: 111
  • Green: 29
  • In the Town Council seat, the result was;

  • Lib Dem (Lynne Beaumont): 420
  • UKIP: 152
  • People First: 277
  • Conservative: 263
  • Labour: 117
  • Green: 35
  • Read more by or more about or .
    This entry was posted in News.
    Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31757 for Twitter and emails.
    Advert

    2 Comments

    • paul barker 24th Nov '12 - 3:04pm

      I did a quick look at libdem vote changes last thursday. For seats last contested in may the average change was essentially zero. However the spread was very uneven with twice as many falls as rises & the typical rise twice as large as the typical fall. That would fit with us making net gains but is it because of a change in our behaviour or the voters ?
      Have we been targeting more ruthlessly or are the voters buying into the media narrative (traitors/hated/finished ) until they see us in the flesh ?

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • User AvatarAdrian PR 2nd Aug - 7:44am
      > [Andrew] > However STV does give the voters the chance to get rid of crooked or lazy > MP’s even if the parties do...
    • User AvatarJonathan Brown 2nd Aug - 2:22am
      Oh, and as for Israel, once again, I am aware of the claims that Syrian fighters are receiving medical treatment inside Israel / occupied Golan,...
    • User AvatarJonathan Brown 2nd Aug - 2:08am
      @Tomas - I think you're greatly oversimplifying things. The Syrian opposition - at least the armed elements of it - has undoubtedly become more dominated...
    • User AvatarStephanie da Roza 2nd Aug - 12:43am
      Richard Underhill: Thanks, I am a hospital doctor. I am a qualified doctor training to hopefully be a paediatric consultant (minimum of 10 years after...
    • User AvatarJohn Bennett 1st Aug - 11:41pm
      Indeed. Parties are the problem. They do, whether they admit or not, yearn for a one party state. For me it's STV or nothing. Even...
    • User AvatarAndrew 1st Aug - 11:33pm
      Anthony, Agree completely re local elections... The problem with STV for Westminster is that we would never get Labour, Greens or UKIP to back it....