Any Questions: it’s not just BBC Question Time that’s the problem

We’ve covered before the habit of BBC Question Time of dropping a Liberal Democrat from the panel (three times in four weeks most recently) and also of loading up the panel with a far from politically balanced set of non-Parliamentarians.

But it’s not only Question Time where that’s a problem. BBC Radio 4′s Any Questions? has a similar habit: the superficial balance is actually undone by a far from balanced set of non-Parliamentarians.

Let’s have a look at the make-up of the Any Questions? panels so far this year:

Number of Conservative Parliamentarians / candidates: 5
Number of Labour Parliamentarians / candidates: 5
Number of Lib Dem Parliamentarians / ex-candidates: 4

That 5:5:4 ratio is debatable but given its the ratio used to allocate party political broadcasts, it’s not awful. But then look at the other panellists. They’ve included Polly Toynbee, Amanda Platell and Kelvin Mackenzie: all of whom have been very open and explicit about their partisan views. But there’s not once been an open pro-Liberal Democrat amongst the other panellists. So whilst when you count Parliamentarians, the panel looks balanced, it’s a rather different picture when you take into account the political affiliations of all the panellists.

Not so good, BBC.

Share:
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18115 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  • Posted 28th February 2010 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    Also, there now hasn’t been a Lib Dem on the Andrew Marr Show since Nick Clegg’s interview some weeks ago. (Though Charles Kennedy is going to be on next week, apparently.)

  • Posted 28th February 2010 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    You know it doexnt surprise me in the slightest that this partisanship is happening on a weekly basis now.

    I got through to the final selection process to be in the audience of BBC’s Question Time. Even though i made it clear in my application form online that i was a paid up member of the Liberal Democrats, which they asked about at the start and were unbothered by, the later called me back and said that there were very striuct rules and I could not be in the audience as a party member as i was biased!

    Isnt everyone in the audience biased once they decide who to vote for or am i missing something?

  • Posted 28th February 2010 at 1:13 pm | Permalink
  • Foregone Conclusion
    Posted 28th February 2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    That’s rather odd, spiderplant. I’ve got a ticket to be in the audience for Any Questions?, and they wanted to know if I was a candidate in local or Parliamentary elections, but this was after I had received my ticket and so purely so they could vet my question. It should really work on the same principle, but clearly not.

  • roger
    Posted 28th February 2010 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    One of my friends has already received a reply to his complaint regarding last week’s panel. Guess what, it was the same bland reply we all received 2 weeks ago. It seems the BBC is so arrogant that it believes we don’t communicate with each other, or perhaps we deserve to be treated as idiots because we actually object to their obvious bias.

  • Posted 28th February 2010 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    To Foregone Conclusion
    It was a rather ridiculous phone call to be honest. I was asked lots of questions about what i did for the party etc. I mentioned that i run the social media side, so face book, twitter etc. It wasn’t a problem until right at the end where they said ‘I’m sorry, you cant come we have very strict rules about that kind of thing’
    I asked for clarification on the rules and he said he couldnt tell me?!

    I’ll see what bog standard reply i get to my complaint.

  • Elizabeth
    Posted 28th February 2010 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    I agree it looks as thought the Beeb are hypnotised like the press by the 2 horse race. I think their main sin is to double up by having blatently tory/labour non-parliamentarians. Like having Michael Heseltine and a tory shadow. Or Roy Hattersley and a labour minister.
    I used to resent this but have realised lately that non-coverage doesn’t seem to affect our poll ratings; like this week, it has been wall to wall tory/labour on Daily Politics,Andrew Marr; The Politics Show, QuestionTime, Any Questions, but it doesn’t seem to have adversely affected our poll ratings, in fact we are a point or so up.
    Also, if there is no LD on, I don’t watch the programme and perhaps this is the most effective form of protest. Boycott .

3 Trackbacks

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?