- Most Read
- Recent Comments
- Op-eds
Author Archives: Alix Mortimer
Who are Vote for a Change?
UPDATE: the data extracted from Vote for a Change and used in this post was extracted around 1.30 this afternoon. Since then, the site’s data has been changed. Please see comments for further details.
Ever hear of Vote for a Change? Vaguely?
Another of the plague-on-all-your-houses, real-reform-now campaigns which have been springing up all over the internet over the past year, right? Yes, that’s what I assumed too.
Their aim, they say, is to advise people on how to vote tactically in each constituency to bring about a hung parliament. This is what they say about how they made their choices:
We began by
…
Why blog?
Welcome to the final part of our “Introduction to blogging” guide for Liberal Democrat bloggers or would-be bloggers. It’s been appearing each Saturday in the run-up to Christmas, with all the posts available via this page. The series will then be revised and collated into an e-book, so please do post up your comments as the series progresses. Today we’re finishing where we started, with reasons to blog. Alix Mortimer is at the keyboard…
Why blog?
The whys and wherefores of political blogging generate a lot of heat. Amble around the internet a little, and you’ll find denunciations of blogging as a …
Is that what I think it is?
There was I, all set to wind down from the keyboard, when this inspirational news descends from politicshome:
The Independent says that Nick Clegg plans a new tax on homes worth over £1m in order to fund raising the basic starting-point for income tax.
It’s a wealth tax! A redistribution of taxation burden on to static capital accumulations and away from economically productive activity! Has anyone told Jock?
Woohoo! If the party adopts this, I’ll even overlook all that airbrushing nonsense…
Sweetly misguided he may be, but…
…top marks for Sunder Katwala of the Fabians for this, reported by James Graham:
When Cameron claims you can’t put a cigarette paper between the Tories and LDs, it makes you wonder what he’s smoking.
Meanwhile, twittery excitement is growing about this afternoon’s debate on civil libs. Richard Dawkins is speaking to his amendment in about half an hour:
@bengoldacre #ldconf there’s also dawkins doing amendment on libel in civil liberties session at 4pm, main hall, we’re going thru his speech now
But never mind the mere intellectual giants and dishy sci-geeks of our age. What could possibly be …
Commentislinked@LDV – bumper edition
I am agog to hear the podcast of last night’s LDV fringe event (hint), but in the meantime, some snippets of news from the jumping-up-and-down-on-the-sidelines school of conference reporting.
First, David Howarth is plugging away the civil liberties message in the Guardian:
…I am still profoundly unconvinced by the Tories’ conversion to the cause of freedom.
First, Tory proposals have a tendency to smack of too little, too late. For instance, its surveillance proposals looked oddly similar to those to be found in the freedom bill. Scrapping ID cards? Getting rid of the ContactPoint database? Reining in councils’ investigatory powers? It’s
…
Conference: Day 2
The agenda
Reports from the Campaign for Gender Balance and the Diversity and Equality Group this morning, then a Scotland/Wales double-act in the form of the policy mortion on the Future of Devolution (short version: more of it please!). There’s a presenttation from Kingston’s Lib Dem group (go Mary!), speeches from Norman Lamb and Ed Davey and a policy motion on the paper “Thriving in a Globalised World – A Strategy for Britain”.
And that’s just before lunch.
Conference: First pictures
It’s that time of year again, folks. Doesn’t it come round quickly? And each year more glorious than the last. Yes it’s:
INTERNATIONAL TALK LIKE A PIRATE DAY!
Arrr. This should make for some interesting speeches from the platform at Bournemouth.
Mark and Alex have already started reporting direct from the Lib Dem Cupboard this morning, which is as luxurious as ever:


I, meanwhile, can’t be in Bournemouth, so I will be your host on the home front, scanning the papers for coverage (with a telescope. Arrr), stealing gossip and …
PMQs: when will Brown admit he’s wrong?
Do my ears deceive me or has Gordon Brown just answered a question?
Cameron skewered Brown with a statement from last week he claimed had been incorrect. He quoted figures to the House – something Brown has mocked him for not doing – which showed unequivocally that capital investment will fall from next year, 2009/10, up to the Olympics year in 2011/12. Brown’s response, of itself, is reasonable – actually 2008/09 expenditure was atypical, due to bringing forward recession investment. He quotes similarly clear figures that show the 2011/12 figure will return to the 2007/08 level.
