Author Archives: Andy May

Opinion: Where do we go from Eastleigh?

Eastleigh railwayman statue - Some rights reserved by Mr. DuckeAfter a superb Eastleigh result, many Lib Dems will be rightly patting themselves on the back for what was a mammoth effort under the most difficult of circumstances. Happy memories came flooding back of the time we used to win by-elections. My first was volunteering in Dunfermline, winning a Labour heartland seat with a 16.2% swing.

After an unprecedented beating, the Tories will clearly take a long hard look at themselves – and hopefully draw all the wrong conclusions, as to why they are in such dire straits in the popularity stakes, by lurching to the right. However drawing all the wrong

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 26 Comments

Opinion: Lib Dems must grasp the nettle of party funding reform

I remember Peter Cruddas, co-treasurer of the No2AV campaign and the No campaign’s single biggest donor. Without him they never could have afforded those sick baby billboards.

Shortly afterwards in June 2011 he was rewarded with a prestigious position as co-treasurer of the Conservative party. Now he lies at the centre of yet another donor scandal, this one leading right to the Prime Minister’s door and is potentially as serious as the cash for peerages scandal under Tony Blair.

The …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 5 Comments

Opinion: Unfair and unbalanced – the scandal of print media referendum coverage

Buried amongst the furore caused by #harigate this week was a pretty damning ruling by the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against the Sun and the Daily Mail. The complaint in question was made in relation to the AV referendum nearly two months ago by Electoral Reform Services – the business arm of the Electoral Reform Society (ERS).

The Sun and Mail were asked by the PCC to print letters apologising for some articles run during the AV referendum campaign. The article which ran on page 2 of the Sun and the front page of the Mail quoted George Osborne after he stood up in Parliament to claim that the ERS, one of the major funders of the Yes campaign would benefit financially from a ‘yes’ vote. This story was then re-run by Sky News and the BBC – subsequent rebuttals gave the story legs across a range of national media outlets.

You can be forgiven for not noticing since few journalists like to turn the spotlight on their own profession’s sometimes questionable practices.

Let’s just think about the context in which this fallacious claim was printed:

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 14 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 2nd Dec - 7:38pm
    I didn't realise that was a requirement Mary. I've already said, I didn't support either Zac or Sarah in the campaign and offered a partial...
  • User AvatarFiona 2nd Dec - 7:30pm
    @Daniel, they may need to be placed within a larger monitoring station, requiring loggers and pumps etc. My point really was that meters definitely do...
  • User AvatarMary Reid 2nd Dec - 7:29pm
    It would be really good if when people make a comment they could state what they did to help the campaign.
  • User AvatarJohn Payne 2nd Dec - 7:15pm
    Michael BG, A problem with trying to explain Land Value Tax (LVT) is that although unfamiliar to many they tend to criticize on the basis...
  • User AvatarDaniel Walker 2nd Dec - 7:03pm
    @Kirsten, @Fiona Very small PM2.5 particle counters do exist, e.g. http://www.alphasense.com/index.php/products/optical-particle-counter/ British company, even!
  • User AvatarFiona 2nd Dec - 6:55pm
    Sorry, had a brain f*rt there. Tom isn't new to the job, but he is a fellow London MP, and a natural ally for Sarah....