Author Archives: Andy May

Opinion: Where do we go from Eastleigh?

Eastleigh railwayman statue - Some rights reserved by Mr. DuckeAfter a superb Eastleigh result, many Lib Dems will be rightly patting themselves on the back for what was a mammoth effort under the most difficult of circumstances. Happy memories came flooding back of the time we used to win by-elections. My first was volunteering in Dunfermline, winning a Labour heartland seat with a 16.2% swing.

After an unprecedented beating, the Tories will clearly take a long hard look at themselves – and hopefully draw all the wrong conclusions, as to why they are in such dire straits in the popularity stakes, by lurching to the right. However drawing all the wrong

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 26 Comments

Opinion: Lib Dems must grasp the nettle of party funding reform

I remember Peter Cruddas, co-treasurer of the No2AV campaign and the No campaign’s single biggest donor. Without him they never could have afforded those sick baby billboards.

Shortly afterwards in June 2011 he was rewarded with a prestigious position as co-treasurer of the Conservative party. Now he lies at the centre of yet another donor scandal, this one leading right to the Prime Minister’s door and is potentially as serious as the cash for peerages scandal under Tony Blair.

The …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 5 Comments

Opinion: Unfair and unbalanced – the scandal of print media referendum coverage

Buried amongst the furore caused by #harigate this week was a pretty damning ruling by the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against the Sun and the Daily Mail. The complaint in question was made in relation to the AV referendum nearly two months ago by Electoral Reform Services – the business arm of the Electoral Reform Society (ERS).

The Sun and Mail were asked by the PCC to print letters apologising for some articles run during the AV referendum campaign. The article which ran on page 2 of the Sun and the front page of the Mail quoted George Osborne after he stood up in Parliament to claim that the ERS, one of the major funders of the Yes campaign would benefit financially from a ‘yes’ vote. This story was then re-run by Sky News and the BBC – subsequent rebuttals gave the story legs across a range of national media outlets.

You can be forgiven for not noticing since few journalists like to turn the spotlight on their own profession’s sometimes questionable practices.

Let’s just think about the context in which this fallacious claim was printed:

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 14 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBarry Snelson 24th Aug - 11:55pm
    Andrew, It is refreshing to hear Stimson, Lyn's and Stevans voices. We shouldn't view Tory voters as though they are afflicted with some disease which...
  • User AvatarBernard Salmon 24th Aug - 11:47pm
    Paul, what's the problem with first class? Sometimes when travelling between Edinburgh and Inverness the first class fare is only a few quid more than...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 24th Aug - 11:31pm
    I am absolutely in favour of good private companies taking on government responsibilities , and absolutely against bad ones doing so ! Why do lousy...
  • User AvatarPeter Davies 24th Aug - 11:21pm
    The remit of this working group is social security. The solution is assumed in the terms of reference. If you start by looking at the...
  • User AvatarPeter Davies 24th Aug - 10:44pm
    The major cause of overcrowded trains is lack of capacity on the network. That's already nationalised. It needs investment. There is no quick fix.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 24th Aug - 10:22pm
    Why did it take until today for Jeremy Corbyn to say that he wanted to sit next to his wife?