Author Archives: Andy May

Opinion: Where do we go from Eastleigh?

Eastleigh railwayman statue - Some rights reserved by Mr. DuckeAfter a superb Eastleigh result, many Lib Dems will be rightly patting themselves on the back for what was a mammoth effort under the most difficult of circumstances. Happy memories came flooding back of the time we used to win by-elections. My first was volunteering in Dunfermline, winning a Labour heartland seat with a 16.2% swing.

After an unprecedented beating, the Tories will clearly take a long hard look at themselves – and hopefully draw all the wrong conclusions, as to why they are in such dire straits in the popularity stakes, by lurching to the right. However drawing all the wrong

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 26 Comments

Opinion: Lib Dems must grasp the nettle of party funding reform

I remember Peter Cruddas, co-treasurer of the No2AV campaign and the No campaign’s single biggest donor. Without him they never could have afforded those sick baby billboards.

Shortly afterwards in June 2011 he was rewarded with a prestigious position as co-treasurer of the Conservative party. Now he lies at the centre of yet another donor scandal, this one leading right to the Prime Minister’s door and is potentially as serious as the cash for peerages scandal under Tony Blair.

The …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 5 Comments

Opinion: Unfair and unbalanced – the scandal of print media referendum coverage

Buried amongst the furore caused by #harigate this week was a pretty damning ruling by the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against the Sun and the Daily Mail. The complaint in question was made in relation to the AV referendum nearly two months ago by Electoral Reform Services – the business arm of the Electoral Reform Society (ERS).

The Sun and Mail were asked by the PCC to print letters apologising for some articles run during the AV referendum campaign. The article which ran on page 2 of the Sun and the front page of the Mail quoted George Osborne after he stood up in Parliament to claim that the ERS, one of the major funders of the Yes campaign would benefit financially from a ‘yes’ vote. This story was then re-run by Sky News and the BBC – subsequent rebuttals gave the story legs across a range of national media outlets.

You can be forgiven for not noticing since few journalists like to turn the spotlight on their own profession’s sometimes questionable practices.

Let’s just think about the context in which this fallacious claim was printed:

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 14 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarT-J 28th Jul - 2:59pm
    I used to be very enthusiastic about the potential of the Commonwealth for driving positive social changes in its members as well as promoting economic...
  • User AvatarRC 28th Jul - 2:49pm
    To quote Churchill: "If it's a blessing in disguise, it seems quite effectively disguised" UKIP may be hypocritical, negative and a waste of space, but...
  • User AvatarHelen Dudden 28th Jul - 2:39pm
    I have always posted under my real name, always written under my real name, if it is law or simply comments ,I have nothing ton...
  • User AvatarGiles Goodall 28th Jul - 2:36pm
    Well done for highlighting the hypocrisy at the heart of the Ukip narrative. Yes, people still voted for them after they failed to turn up...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 28th Jul - 2:32pm
    Politics is about emotion as well as rationality, and the idea of respect should not in my view be used to suppress the freedom to...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 28th Jul - 2:13pm
    Just seen the guidance of not letting a thread degenerate between two or three people. I'll try to abide by this, I just think it...