Author Archives: Andy May

Opinion: Where do we go from Eastleigh?

Eastleigh railwayman statue - Some rights reserved by Mr. DuckeAfter a superb Eastleigh result, many Lib Dems will be rightly patting themselves on the back for what was a mammoth effort under the most difficult of circumstances. Happy memories came flooding back of the time we used to win by-elections. My first was volunteering in Dunfermline, winning a Labour heartland seat with a 16.2% swing.

After an unprecedented beating, the Tories will clearly take a long hard look at themselves – and hopefully draw all the wrong conclusions, as to why they are in such dire straits in the popularity stakes, by lurching to the right. However drawing all the wrong

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 26 Comments

Opinion: Lib Dems must grasp the nettle of party funding reform

I remember Peter Cruddas, co-treasurer of the No2AV campaign and the No campaign’s single biggest donor. Without him they never could have afforded those sick baby billboards.

Shortly afterwards in June 2011 he was rewarded with a prestigious position as co-treasurer of the Conservative party. Now he lies at the centre of yet another donor scandal, this one leading right to the Prime Minister’s door and is potentially as serious as the cash for peerages scandal under Tony Blair.

The …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 5 Comments

Opinion: Unfair and unbalanced – the scandal of print media referendum coverage

Buried amongst the furore caused by #harigate this week was a pretty damning ruling by the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) against the Sun and the Daily Mail. The complaint in question was made in relation to the AV referendum nearly two months ago by Electoral Reform Services – the business arm of the Electoral Reform Society (ERS).

The Sun and Mail were asked by the PCC to print letters apologising for some articles run during the AV referendum campaign. The article which ran on page 2 of the Sun and the front page of the Mail quoted George Osborne after he stood up in Parliament to claim that the ERS, one of the major funders of the Yes campaign would benefit financially from a ‘yes’ vote. This story was then re-run by Sky News and the BBC – subsequent rebuttals gave the story legs across a range of national media outlets.

You can be forgiven for not noticing since few journalists like to turn the spotlight on their own profession’s sometimes questionable practices.

Let’s just think about the context in which this fallacious claim was printed:

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 14 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 2nd Feb - 1:02am
    Malc Paying for public services can be done not only by levying tax. for that matter, funding the deficit doesn't have to be done through...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 2nd Feb - 12:18am
    Sure, the Greens have a long way to go. At least they are trying. They are heading in the right direction. The Cleggites are going...
  • User Avatarmalc 2nd Feb - 12:16am
    Syriza might be simplistic, but they are offering people hope, which is more than the UK political parties are doing. There is a decent size...
  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 2nd Feb - 12:05am
    Simon Shaw "the same sort of simplistic solutions as Syriza," I have to say that the notion you have of starving people until the economy...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 1st Feb - 11:11pm
    @Mr Wallace "Thing is though, if a Green Party with 1 MP who got very little support at the last election can be polling higher...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 1st Feb - 10:00pm
    Its more doublethink than hypocrisy, they really do see themselves as "a moral crusade" & paradoxically that means they can use any methods to win.