Author Archives: Daniel Wright

The Independent View: Osborne’s small beer budget

There are, at most, 777 days until the next UK General Election. Today’s Budget was the last real chance to introduce measures that will have time to create a real impact before then. This, however, was not a Budget designed to alter the path of the economy in any dramatic way:  the Coalition has never veered far from the course set at the Spending Review almost three years ago. Instead, this was a narrow Budget, full of small measures.

That is not to say that this Budget is not important in terms of the next election. Small as its measures were, …

Posted in Op-eds and The Independent View | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Independent View: Cameron’s European vision and the Liberal Democrat opportunity

Not sallying forth to Amsterdam, but in the more functional surroundings of Bloomberg Europe in London, David Cameron has finally given forth his vision for the future of the UK’s relationship with the EU. Despite the context of the speech as a necessary manoeuvre to shore up support for Cameron from his hardline eurosceptic backbenchers and head off a UKIP challenge, the prime minister clearly made a great effort to ensure he sounded reasonable and moderate. Who could disagree with a vision of a more efficient, effective and accountable EU?

In this, Cameron made an astute address, in terms of his …

Posted in Op-eds and The Independent View | Tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: The autumn statement was constrained by a lack of both ambition and funds

Today we witnessed a government and a chancellor with a lack of wiggle room writhing around to the best of their ability. George Osborne was on surprisingly good form compared to the blundered budget, and Ed Balls was insipid in a response that seemed to ignore the forecasts and measures just outlined before him. Nevertheless, even with the chancellor on song and his opposite number off-key, it will be difficult for the coalition to use the statement as much of a turning point in the narrative of this government.

Whilst both parties would like the press and the public to be …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 13 Comments

The Independent View: Cameron changes his choir, but the song remains the same

Reshuffles are necessary, even if they largely amount to political theatre. Few outside the Westminster bubble pay much attention, and they rarely herald wholesale policy shifts, but they are a key weapon in a Prime Minister’s arsenal in terms of placating backbenchers and stamping some authority on an administration. The most effective political operators of modern times used reshuffles masterfully; Margaret Thatcher cleared her Cabinet of ‘wets’ in 1981, instigating the most radical period of her administration.

So, how did Cameron’s first major reshuffle go? The key outcome is the failed attempt to shift Iain Duncan Smith to the Justice Department …

Posted in Op-eds | 4 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 4th Aug - 12:25pm
    Denis Loretto 4th Aug '15 - 10:06am John Hume made the same point about walls, speaking in London, in good health at the time. The...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 4th Aug - 12:19pm
    Denis Loretto 4th Aug '15 - 10:06am I have over-simplified and probably made important omissions. For instance for an asylum claim to succeed the applicant...
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 4th Aug - 12:07pm
    Mathew Huntbach said "So how do you suppose 57 Liberal Democrat MPs were going to achieve this in a Parliament of 650 MPs, 564 of...
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 4th Aug - 12:07pm
    Thank you all for your comments especially Caron. Just one quick point of information. Someone mentioned Islam earlier. Islamic and Jewish teaching protect and support...
  • User AvatarJohn Tilley 4th Aug - 11:56am
    Can anyone confirm that The Met has been using facial recognition software for 15 years or more? I think I have a vague memory of...
  • User AvatarSadie Smith 4th Aug - 11:30am
    It can be seen in the 'pick a ward' light. Though usually more than one ward. There are one or two high profile people who...