Author Archives: David Hall-Matthews

Opinion: 2013 – Time to think afresh about International Development?

Lynne Featherstone in Zambia. Photo:  some rights reserved by DFID http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8220719712/Another year, another set of attacks on development aid in the right-wing press. Prompted by a spectacularly ill-informed paper from Civitas, the Telegraph, Mail and Spectator tried once again to argue, without evidence, that high proportions of British aid are wasted.

The truth is that, under the Coalition, far more attention has been paid to value for money in aid spending than ever before. What is more, there’s little need to speculate about where

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 22 Comments

Opinion: Why the UK should keep its promises on international aid

The best use of aid for International Development has been a controversial topic recently, with rows over the need for aid to India spilling onto the front pages – many of them spectacularly ill-informed on both sides. That issue is complex – but at least you can rely on Liberal Democrats to think about it carefully. In 2010, I chaired a policy working group on international Development, which argued that the UK should focus on supporting good governance, sovereignty and accountability to the poor, so that countries could move away from aid dependency. As India has all of those, we argued that aid to India could stop now. However, with more people living below the poverty line in India than the whole of Africa, the counter-argument is also strong. In the end an amendment from House of Commons International Development Select Committee Chair Malcolm Bruce, calling for aid to continue for now, was supported by conference.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 3 Comments

Opinion: Interpreting the internal election results

The bare bones of the internal party election results were set out here on Saturday showing who had been elected by conference reps to the various committees.

The detailed results for the Federal Executive and the Federal Policy Committee, hosted by Colin Rosenstiel, show some revealing trends when compared with previous years’ election results.

This year, in the Federal Executive elections, Evan Harris came top on first preference by a long stretch with 263 votes. Following him was David Rendel (107) and Ramesh Dewan (77) with others on 55. Evan is clearly identified with the progressive, Social Liberal wing …

Posted in Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , and | 38 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 27th May - 10:18pm
    Alex Macfie, I was showing that Corbyn was far from alone in pointing out that the AIA would make things worse not better. It so...
  • User Avatarexpats 27th May - 10:11pm
    Peter Watson 27th May '17 - 7:57pm............Yesterday the normally unflappable Michael Fallon looked “flapped” in a TV interview in which he criticised comments by Boris...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 27th May - 9:58pm
    expats: Quite what you are trying to show by listing the MPs who opposed the Anglo-Irish Agreement is unclear. What is clear is that they...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 27th May - 9:48pm
    @ Andrew McCaig, No problem Andrew, would that it was only my mobile pone that was acting up. Damn it, this is an effort. I...
  • User AvatarAndrew T 27th May - 9:32pm
    @Matt Severn How big is the threat of far right terrorism? My concern with government strategies involving radicalisation is they end up too broad in...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 27th May - 9:16pm
    Sorry! Phone acting up! Jayne, I don’t see how you can possibly say that dementia in the way the term is normally used is not...