Author Archives: David Hall-Matthews

Opinion: 2013 – Time to think afresh about International Development?

Lynne Featherstone in Zambia. Photo:  some rights reserved by DFID year, another set of attacks on development aid in the right-wing press. Prompted by a spectacularly ill-informed paper from Civitas, the Telegraph, Mail and Spectator tried once again to argue, without evidence, that high proportions of British aid are wasted.

The truth is that, under the Coalition, far more attention has been paid to value for money in aid spending than ever before. What is more, there’s little need to speculate about where

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 22 Comments

Opinion: Why the UK should keep its promises on international aid

The best use of aid for International Development has been a controversial topic recently, with rows over the need for aid to India spilling onto the front pages – many of them spectacularly ill-informed on both sides. That issue is complex – but at least you can rely on Liberal Democrats to think about it carefully. In 2010, I chaired a policy working group on international Development, which argued that the UK should focus on supporting good governance, sovereignty and accountability to the poor, so that countries could move away from aid dependency. As India has all of those, we argued that aid to India could stop now. However, with more people living below the poverty line in India than the whole of Africa, the counter-argument is also strong. In the end an amendment from House of Commons International Development Select Committee Chair Malcolm Bruce, calling for aid to continue for now, was supported by conference.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 3 Comments

Opinion: Interpreting the internal election results

The bare bones of the internal party election results were set out here on Saturday showing who had been elected by conference reps to the various committees.

The detailed results for the Federal Executive and the Federal Policy Committee, hosted by Colin Rosenstiel, show some revealing trends when compared with previous years’ election results.

This year, in the Federal Executive elections, Evan Harris came top on first preference by a long stretch with 263 votes. Following him was David Rendel (107) and Ramesh Dewan (77) with others on 55. Evan is clearly identified with the progressive, Social Liberal wing …

Posted in Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , and | 38 Comments

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Bancroft 25th Nov - 12:08am
    Has anyone asked why the airports outside of London have spare capacity? Isn't it likely to be that nobody wants to buy the capacity, despite...
  • User Avatarnigel hunter 24th Nov - 11:28pm
    I hear that there is now a majority to leave the Eu. This may be fear of what is happening in Europe. ISIS winning the...
  • User Avatarnigel hunter 24th Nov - 11:17pm
    Saudi's fund the Jihadis. The Government fund the Saudis? Is it in both their interests to keep the conflict going? Saudis sell cheap oil to...
  • User AvatarBenjamin Teall 24th Nov - 10:28pm
    Interesting comparison?
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 24th Nov - 10:04pm
    @expats When I was 18, I went to university unsure which political party was the best fit for me. So I decided to go to...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 24th Nov - 9:58pm
    I am a bit puzzled by this though: "A major feature of all the results, even in fairly strong Labour areas, was the Labour vote...