Author Archives: David Hall-Matthews

Opinion: 2013 – Time to think afresh about International Development?

Lynne Featherstone in Zambia. Photo:  some rights reserved by DFID http://www.flickr.com/photos/dfid/8220719712/Another year, another set of attacks on development aid in the right-wing press. Prompted by a spectacularly ill-informed paper from Civitas, the Telegraph, Mail and Spectator tried once again to argue, without evidence, that high proportions of British aid are wasted.

The truth is that, under the Coalition, far more attention has been paid to value for money in aid spending than ever before. What is more, there’s little need to speculate about where

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 22 Comments

Opinion: Why the UK should keep its promises on international aid

The best use of aid for International Development has been a controversial topic recently, with rows over the need for aid to India spilling onto the front pages – many of them spectacularly ill-informed on both sides. That issue is complex – but at least you can rely on Liberal Democrats to think about it carefully. In 2010, I chaired a policy working group on international Development, which argued that the UK should focus on supporting good governance, sovereignty and accountability to the poor, so that countries could move away from aid dependency. As India has all of those, we argued that aid to India could stop now. However, with more people living below the poverty line in India than the whole of Africa, the counter-argument is also strong. In the end an amendment from House of Commons International Development Select Committee Chair Malcolm Bruce, calling for aid to continue for now, was supported by conference.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 3 Comments

Opinion: Interpreting the internal election results

The bare bones of the internal party election results were set out here on Saturday showing who had been elected by conference reps to the various committees.

The detailed results for the Federal Executive and the Federal Policy Committee, hosted by Colin Rosenstiel, show some revealing trends when compared with previous years’ election results.

This year, in the Federal Executive elections, Evan Harris came top on first preference by a long stretch with 263 votes. Following him was David Rendel (107) and Ramesh Dewan (77) with others on 55. Evan is clearly identified with the progressive, Social Liberal wing …

Posted in Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , and | 38 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJane Ann Liston 25th Apr - 1:08am
    Ashcroft may actually be helping us in some places. In North East Fife we've been telling voters that the Tories simply can't win here for...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 25th Apr - 12:37am
    @ Stevan "Policy should be based on what is good for the UK not what is good for HSBC." Agreed. But this should not just...
  • User AvatarRabih Makki 25th Apr - 12:13am
    @ TCO....some of us have core belief and values that stay with us all our lives, others less so, but for those who don't(and much...
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 24th Apr - 11:56pm
    As we get closer to the election, I still wonder whether the results of polls in marginal seats could influence voter intentions, especially when it...
  • User AvatarTCO 24th Apr - 11:47pm
    @Stephen @Rab this is an interesting debate. I would argue that I don't believe my outlook on life has changed dramatically since I was 18...
  • User AvatarRabih Makki 24th Apr - 11:39pm
    @ Stephen, ...I agree business to an extent is built on human relationships, but then again most things in every day life are. However the...
Sat 25th Apr 2015