Author Archives: Gerald Vernon-Jackson

Opinion: Does the central and local government relationship need rewiring?

Wired Government smallerThe relationship between central and local government in the UK has always been strained. The UK is one of the most centralised democracies in Europe, and as we have no written constitution local government has no automatic right to exist or do anything. Everything is dependent on the decisions of ministers.

The new Government in 2010 did good things in reversing some of the things the last right-wing, authoritarian and centralising government had done. The huge inspection and reporting regime was abolished. Ring fencing of budgets was mainly done away with. The Localism Act was brought in that gave local government the power of local competence.

Posted in Local government, News and Op-eds | Tagged and | 6 Comments

Danny, Don and Nick stand up for Local Government in a way that Pickles never has

The Autumn Statement has announced no further cuts to local government in the next financial year, with a 2% cut the following year.

We’re grateful to Danny Alexander, Don Foster and Nick Clegg for stepping in and saying “no” to further cuts to local services over the next year – in a way we just haven’t seen from the DCLG Secretary of State, Eric Pickles.

Liberal Democrat Ministers have stopped an across-the-board cut of 1% to local government next year. That means up to £240m extra that will be in council budgets every year which will help fund youth services, streets, parks, …

Posted in Local government and News | Tagged , , and | 1 Comment

Opinion: Reflections on local and national power

Well, Autumn Conference in Liverpool was an interesting experience. Bumping into Ministers and asking them to sort out issues was strange. An odd aircraft carrier here, and regeneration scheme there. Who knows if these discussions had any effect, but at least we could ask the people who might make the decisions. Few of us now remember the last time this happened. The 1929 Liberal Assembly seems a long time ago now.

Being in coalition has this upside. To be able to influence decisions is what we stand for elections for. We think our ideas are better than those of the other …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 3 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarR Uduwerage-Perera 30th Mar - 6:43am
    At this moment the idea of a Labour/LibDem/SNP Coalition strikes me as potentially far more progressive than the current Coalition.
  • User AvatarDavid-1 30th Mar - 6:36am
    I think the usual approach to immigration is completely backwards. People start by asking "how many immigrants can we tolerate?" and, once that is answered...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 4:39am
    @ Stuart This is getting rather tiresome... I did get it, I have studied economics and have a reasonable grasp of statistics. I know the...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:28am
    @ Stuart "There is no need for you to come up with your own “interpretation” of what Labour’s pledge means, because Labour have been very...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:10am
    @ PT I agree with you that GDP per head is a better proxy for economic welfare than the absolute level of GDP, which merely...
  • User AvatarGary Mc 30th Mar - 12:47am
    I've noticed all of the polls seem to give the SNP more seats than us (Liberal Democrats). I'm not sure the SNP will win as...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015