Author Archives: James King

Opinion: The case against Coalition 2.0

House of Commons. Crown Copyright applies to this photo - http://www.flickr.com/photos/uk_parliament/4642915654/Hung Parliaments have become rather like buses for Lib Dems. For election after election we longed for one to come along. Now it seems a second one will turn up rather sooner than we might want it.

Another hung parliament doesn’t automatically mean another coalition involving the Lib Dems. And despite having been a firm advocate of coalition in 2010, I am very sceptical that Coalition 2.0 is in the interests of the party or liberalism.

I should state at the outset that while I’m predicting that the Tories will again have the largest number of seats – and probably Tory + Lib Dem MPs will make up a (slim) majority – most of my arguments are just as relevant to scenarios where Labour is in the lead.

Posted in Op-eds | 54 Comments

Opinion: Feeling at home with housing policy

With the general election less than two years away, it is increasingly important for the Lib Dems to pursue ‘differentiation’ from our coalition partners. This includes advancing clear and specific Lib Dem proposals that we will seek to deliver this side of the election. But we should also start highlighting priorities which will form the basis of our pitch to the electorate in 2015.

The emerging agenda includes support for wealth taxes, defence of EU membership and the protection of civil liberties. These issues are as important as ever, but at this stage our platform seems light on ‘social liberalism’ and …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: Four point plan for a liberal, democratic Europe

Europe is rising up the political agenda. It’s an issue that could bring down David Cameron or break-up the coalition. Yet the Liberal Democrats are strangely silent. The EU didn’t appear on the Brighton conference agenda and we no longer have a Minister in the Foreign Office. We need to develop a vision for a liberal, democratic EU and get smart about fighting for it.

Here’s my four point plan:

Posted in Europe / International and Op-eds | Tagged , , , , and | 47 Comments

Opinion: 5 reasons the AV referendum lost

Here is my take on the five main reasons why the UK gave such a comprehensive thumbs down to AV, with one important lesson for the future:

  1. Tuition fees and trust – This is not the place to rehearse all the arguments on tuition fees. But there can be no denying that it was a significant turning point in public perceptions of Nick Clegg. Even though over 300 Tory MPs voted for higher fees, the Conservative-dominated No campaign ruthlessly exploited this as an argument against coalitions in general and Clegg in particular. While I believe the policy itself can be justified, Clegg clearly under-estimated the political cost of a U-turn, particularly in the context ofacritical referendum that needed to be won only a few months later.
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 46 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatartheakes 30th Mar - 9:23am
    The past is past, we have to learn from the horrible mistakes we made, within which I include myself. Forget coalitions, let a minority government...
  • User Avatarjohn 30th Mar - 9:00am
    Well said Bill. We need a post-liberal liberalism. newliberalsite.wordpress.com
  • User AvatarSteve Trevethan 30th Mar - 8:39am
    Thank you for a most interesting and important piece. "Tell me how people are to be measured and I can tell you how they will...
  • User Avatarmatt 30th Mar - 8:29am
    @Katharine Pindar Thank you for those kind and thoughtful words, however, I am not sure that anything I have said or done had anything to...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 30th Mar - 7:46am
    How do you effectively hold someone to account? Do you create a straw man (Hard Brexit) and indulge in some pretty juvenile 'ya-boing'? Isn't this...
  • User AvatarAndrew Tampion 30th Mar - 6:26am
    Red Liberal How are Labour MPs to depose Mr Corbyn when the members elect the Labour Leader and the members have twice elected him?