Author Archives: James King

Opinion: The case against Coalition 2.0

House of Commons. Crown Copyright applies to this photo - http://www.flickr.com/photos/uk_parliament/4642915654/Hung Parliaments have become rather like buses for Lib Dems. For election after election we longed for one to come along. Now it seems a second one will turn up rather sooner than we might want it.

Another hung parliament doesn’t automatically mean another coalition involving the Lib Dems. And despite having been a firm advocate of coalition in 2010, I am very sceptical that Coalition 2.0 is in the interests of the party or liberalism.

I should state at the outset that while I’m predicting that the Tories will again have the largest number of seats – and probably Tory + Lib Dem MPs will make up a (slim) majority – most of my arguments are just as relevant to scenarios where Labour is in the lead.

Posted in Op-eds | 54 Comments

Opinion: Feeling at home with housing policy

With the general election less than two years away, it is increasingly important for the Lib Dems to pursue ‘differentiation’ from our coalition partners. This includes advancing clear and specific Lib Dem proposals that we will seek to deliver this side of the election. But we should also start highlighting priorities which will form the basis of our pitch to the electorate in 2015.

The emerging agenda includes support for wealth taxes, defence of EU membership and the protection of civil liberties. These issues are as important as ever, but at this stage our platform seems light on ‘social liberalism’ and …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 13 Comments

Opinion: Four point plan for a liberal, democratic Europe

Europe is rising up the political agenda. It’s an issue that could bring down David Cameron or break-up the coalition. Yet the Liberal Democrats are strangely silent. The EU didn’t appear on the Brighton conference agenda and we no longer have a Minister in the Foreign Office. We need to develop a vision for a liberal, democratic EU and get smart about fighting for it.

Here’s my four point plan:

Posted in Europe / International and Op-eds | Tagged , , , , and | 47 Comments

Opinion: 5 reasons the AV referendum lost

Here is my take on the five main reasons why the UK gave such a comprehensive thumbs down to AV, with one important lesson for the future:

  1. Tuition fees and trust – This is not the place to rehearse all the arguments on tuition fees. But there can be no denying that it was a significant turning point in public perceptions of Nick Clegg. Even though over 300 Tory MPs voted for higher fees, the Conservative-dominated No campaign ruthlessly exploited this as an argument against coalitions in general and Clegg in particular. While I believe the policy itself can be justified, Clegg clearly under-estimated the political cost of a U-turn, particularly in the context ofacritical referendum that needed to be won only a few months later.
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 46 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMick Taylor 23rd Sep - 1:33pm
    Unfortunately Labour's idea of working together is to support them unthinkingly. They view us as Labour mark 2 and simply don't understand that we may...
  • User AvatarJohn Littler 23rd Sep - 1:20pm
    The PPB was very amusing and may have more impact than any for a long time, perhaps since Cleese's. The groundhog day PPB was so...
  • User AvatarPhil Wainewright 23rd Sep - 1:15pm
    If we truly "believe in competitive markets" then every operator must be held accountable to the same rules - and the rules must ensure a...
  • User AvatarNick Thornsby 23rd Sep - 1:02pm
    Good piece Andy, and I agree with Paul Barker above. It is striking how many Lib Dems have supported the decision, on the implicit assumption...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 23rd Sep - 12:25pm
    In this case it feels to me that TFL were acting to protect "their" producers rather than their customers. TFL dont seem neutral in this,...
  • User Avatarfrankie 23rd Sep - 11:37am
    Arnold's regarding your statement "Remainers can be pleased with May’s speech. " you couldn't be more wrong in my case. Her speech effectively says we...