Author Archives: Mike Bird

Opinion: The Welfare Uprating Bill is a mistake; this is not economic liberalism

I was saddened to hear during the Autumn Statement that increases in many benefits would be capped at 1% for the next three years, particularly because I was in total agreement with David Laws when he opposed a similar policy last year. I was also disappointed that after months of party figures grandstanding about any welfare cuts being contingent on reformed property taxes, no higher council tax bands were announced.

Abandoning indexation for benefits does not just affect them in the year that benefits are not indexed. To use Job Seeker’s Allowance as an example, if inflation is 3% …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 21 Comments

Opinion: bashing bankers the economically liberal way – risk and responsibility

Just before conference I caught some largely unreported news on a Private Member’s Bill, put to the Commons by Steve Baker MP, founder of the Cobden Centre, and one of the Conservative 2010 intake.

My usual response to scant coverage of a Conservative backbencher’s bills would be thankful, but in this case, the bill highlights something that has received astonishingly little attention: reforming the personal liability of directors. We’ve rested on the important points of how to discharge shares in effectively state-owned institutions, and how to increase lending to struggling businesses. On these issues Stephen Williams …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 11 Comments

Competition and Universities: building new Higher Education policy

We took a severe beating in late 2010, from which we’re still not entirely recovered. From here, we can go in two directions: we can build a Higher Education policy that we can be proud of, or we can leave our policy in the pieces it’s currently in, and prepare for 2015’s brutal assault.

It’s hard to see a treasured policy fall apart under the pressure of electoral and financial reality. We all know there are positive aspects of the increase in graduate contributions that we can claim as ours: a Labour or Tory government would not have faced the …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 12 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 24th Feb - 7:44pm
    @Dan Falchikov: If you really think that LDV was uncritical during the coalition years, then you haven't read very much of it. We carried very...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 24th Feb - 7:28pm
    @Catherine Jane Crosland Dear Catherine, you misunderstood me. I meant the motion itself, which seems to offer very minor changes to our existing policy. Unilateralism...
  • User AvatarFiona 24th Feb - 7:19pm
    On the news earlier, there were Stoke residents saying that UKIP struggled in a Brexit area because there's more going on that being pro/against Brexit,...
  • User AvatarPeter 24th Feb - 7:06pm
    Drax is a monument to Lib Dem green policy. Before Mr Farron pours too many insults on Trump (and I am no supporter of the...
  • User AvatarMartin 24th Feb - 6:55pm
    Bilal: A challenging point of view. Certainly when there is a four way split, any seat is up for grabs. Your contention rests on all...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 24th Feb - 6:52pm
    @David Becket "What have we to excite them nationally, not a lot." @Simon Freeman "The party needs to show thinking on ..." @Lorenzo Cherin (another...