Author Archives: Phil Ling

Opinion: The pressures of being a parliamentary candidate

20140201-202125.jpg Sarah YongIt is with a sad, and heavy, heart that yesterday I heard of Sarah Yong’s decision to stand down as PPC for Somerton and Frome for personal reasons. What is even sadder is that people are demanding to know the personal reasons, either because the privacy of an individual is less important than what this means to the party or to show it’s not because of the party prospects. If an employee (even CEO) of an organisation stepped down for personal reasons it is normally respected and the organisation moves on.

Posted in Op-eds | 13 Comments

Opinion: Canvassing – a few steps to success

Dundonald ward, in Merton, was awarded the “most canvassed ward in London” at the London Liberal Democrats regional conference.  As one of the people co-ordinating the campaign in the ward, it was great that the hard work was recognised, but I was also a bit surprised.

Not surprised as in “can’t believe we’d won”, but surprised in the fact it didn’t feel like hard work, once the initial groundwork had been done. In reality, although there were times where we were out doing surveys, recruiting or canvassing twice a week, it averaged about once a week. The canvass teams were never huge, 3-5 people, with the

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments

Opinion: Two ways to help fix the global crisis

It has long become clear that the financial crisis has been on a scale deeper and larger than many people have suspected. It has also been exacerbated by muddled policy responses from all Governments and policy makers. Whilst the need to control debt is not in doubt, capital expenditure projects should be pursued and tighter bank regulations need introducing (with much clearer splits between retail and investment banks); all economies are still struggling.

Step one: better Quantitative Easing

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments

Opinion: What right do politicians have to decide rules on their own jobs?

The party funding report by the Committee for Standards in Public Life was barely off the printers and politicians from all parties were saying they were broadly supportive, but more importantly could not back the main suggestion that state funding of political parties be increased.

Party funding will always be tough to square given the reliance of Labour on union money and the Conservatives (and increasingly the Liberal Democrats) on major donors. State funding is inevitable to reduce sleaze, real or inferred, and trust in politics. It only costs  the equivalent of a couple of first class stamps a year, …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 2 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAdam Robertson 25th Oct - 2:21am
    I think having Alex Salmond back in the House of Commons, will invigorate politics in both north of the border and south of the border....
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 25th Oct - 1:26am
    Eddie Sammon I just want to make a quick point that if you try to set up a business in some sectors then it really...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 25th Oct - 1:24am
    I would urge LDV readers to check out a range of reports of the results of this deal. The piece above is, to say the...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 25th Oct - 1:16am
    Glenn According to the election material the Tuition fee pledge was fully costed. It is not up to students or Joe Public to give politicians...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 25th Oct - 1:05am
    Tony, I am sure you work hard and your intentions are genuine. But I dispute your right to do that work and therefore any right...
  • User AvatarRoland 25th Oct - 12:53am
    Geoff - I suspect given both the benchmark - emission levels in 1990 - on which the 40% reduction is based and the timescales -...