Author Archives: Phil Ling

Opinion: The pressures of being a parliamentary candidate

20140201-202125.jpg Sarah YongIt is with a sad, and heavy, heart that yesterday I heard of Sarah Yong’s decision to stand down as PPC for Somerton and Frome for personal reasons. What is even sadder is that people are demanding to know the personal reasons, either because the privacy of an individual is less important than what this means to the party or to show it’s not because of the party prospects. If an employee (even CEO) of an organisation stepped down for personal reasons it is normally respected and the organisation moves on.

Posted in Op-eds | 13 Comments

Opinion: Canvassing – a few steps to success

Dundonald ward, in Merton, was awarded the “most canvassed ward in London” at the London Liberal Democrats regional conference.  As one of the people co-ordinating the campaign in the ward, it was great that the hard work was recognised, but I was also a bit surprised.

Not surprised as in “can’t believe we’d won”, but surprised in the fact it didn’t feel like hard work, once the initial groundwork had been done. In reality, although there were times where we were out doing surveys, recruiting or canvassing twice a week, it averaged about once a week. The canvass teams were never huge, 3-5 people, with the

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments

Opinion: Two ways to help fix the global crisis

It has long become clear that the financial crisis has been on a scale deeper and larger than many people have suspected. It has also been exacerbated by muddled policy responses from all Governments and policy makers. Whilst the need to control debt is not in doubt, capital expenditure projects should be pursued and tighter bank regulations need introducing (with much clearer splits between retail and investment banks); all economies are still struggling.

Step one: better Quantitative Easing

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments

Opinion: What right do politicians have to decide rules on their own jobs?

The party funding report by the Committee for Standards in Public Life was barely off the printers and politicians from all parties were saying they were broadly supportive, but more importantly could not back the main suggestion that state funding of political parties be increased.

Party funding will always be tough to square given the reliance of Labour on union money and the Conservatives (and increasingly the Liberal Democrats) on major donors. State funding is inevitable to reduce sleaze, real or inferred, and trust in politics. It only costs  the equivalent of a couple of first class stamps a year, …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 20th Dec - 12:44pm
    Five words which make no sense!
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 20th Dec - 12:41pm
    SpookyBird 19th Dec '14 - 6:37pm You asked about sources on the targetting of teenagers with nicotine products in some states in the USA. My...
  • User Avatardavid 20th Dec - 12:38pm
    The claim that the EU is good for us was tested in the Clegg-Farage debates. Clegg's 'facts' were transparent nonsense.
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 20th Dec - 12:19pm
    I remember a constituent we worked with having to get two buses in a wheelchair to get to his benefits assessment. Have we lost the...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 20th Dec - 12:11pm
    Robin McGhee 20th Dec '14 - 9:53am " Still no evidence has been presented to show these proposals would discourage people from working in any...
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 20th Dec - 12:09pm
    This is a fantastic piece: especially as it actually understands that the debate on the European Union is more to do with identity than economics....
Sat 20th Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015