Author Archives: Phil Ling

Phil Ling

Opinion: Canvassing – a few steps to success

By Phil Ling | Thu 1st November 2012 - 9:06 am

Dundonald ward, in Merton, was awarded the “most canvassed ward in London” at the London Liberal Democrats regional conference.  As one of the people co-ordinating the campaign in the ward, it was great that the hard work was recognised, but I was also a bit surprised.

Not surprised as in “can’t believe we’d won”, but surprised in the fact it didn’t feel like hard work, once the initial groundwork had been done. In reality, although there were times where we were out doing surveys, recruiting or canvassing twice a week, it averaged about once a week. The canvass teams were never huge, 3-5 people, with the

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments
Phil Ling

Opinion: Two ways to help fix the global crisis

By Phil Ling | Sat 20th October 2012 - 10:50 am

It has long become clear that the financial crisis has been on a scale deeper and larger than many people have suspected. It has also been exacerbated by muddled policy responses from all Governments and policy makers. Whilst the need to control debt is not in doubt, capital expenditure projects should be pursued and tighter bank regulations need introducing (with much clearer splits between retail and investment banks); all economies are still struggling.

Step one: better Quantitative Easing

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments
Phil Ling

Opinion: What right do politicians have to decide rules on their own jobs?

By Phil Ling | Thu 24th November 2011 - 2:25 pm

The party funding report by the Committee for Standards in Public Life was barely off the printers and politicians from all parties were saying they were broadly supportive, but more importantly could not back the main suggestion that state funding of political parties be increased.

Party funding will always be tough to square given the reliance of Labour on union money and the Conservatives (and increasingly the Liberal Democrats) on major donors. State funding is inevitable to reduce sleaze, real or inferred, and trust in politics. It only costs  the equivalent of a couple of first class stamps a year, …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 2 Comments



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 21st May - 10:17pm
    I agree, Ed. I had feared they would vote against, though. I feel that they need to account for what they did.
  • User AvatarEd Fordham 21st May - 9:37pm
    Clearly individual MPs have to account for themselves but is it appropriate for the Deputy Leader and Party President of the Liberal Democrats, Messers Hughes...
  • User AvatarRichard Church 21st May - 9:35pm
    Great news. It is disappointing though that the humanist weddings amendment had to be withdrawn at the last minute due to a legal opinion from...
  • User AvatarJonathan Brown 21st May - 9:33pm
    "Only by the Western democracies and the Arab League States being prepared to match the military and political committment of Russia and Iran, by putting...
  • User AvatarDave Page 21st May - 9:06pm
    This Bill isn't good enough, particularly the lack of equal civil partnerships and the lack of action on trans marriage restoration. But it's still better...