Author Archives: Phil Ling

Opinion: The pressures of being a parliamentary candidate

20140201-202125.jpg Sarah YongIt is with a sad, and heavy, heart that yesterday I heard of Sarah Yong’s decision to stand down as PPC for Somerton and Frome for personal reasons. What is even sadder is that people are demanding to know the personal reasons, either because the privacy of an individual is less important than what this means to the party or to show it’s not because of the party prospects. If an employee (even CEO) of an organisation stepped down for personal reasons it is normally respected and the organisation moves on.

Posted in Op-eds | 13 Comments

Opinion: Canvassing – a few steps to success

Dundonald ward, in Merton, was awarded the “most canvassed ward in London” at the London Liberal Democrats regional conference.  As one of the people co-ordinating the campaign in the ward, it was great that the hard work was recognised, but I was also a bit surprised.

Not surprised as in “can’t believe we’d won”, but surprised in the fact it didn’t feel like hard work, once the initial groundwork had been done. In reality, although there were times where we were out doing surveys, recruiting or canvassing twice a week, it averaged about once a week. The canvass teams were never huge, 3-5 people, with the

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments

Opinion: Two ways to help fix the global crisis

It has long become clear that the financial crisis has been on a scale deeper and larger than many people have suspected. It has also been exacerbated by muddled policy responses from all Governments and policy makers. Whilst the need to control debt is not in doubt, capital expenditure projects should be pursued and tighter bank regulations need introducing (with much clearer splits between retail and investment banks); all economies are still struggling.

Step one: better Quantitative Easing

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments

Opinion: What right do politicians have to decide rules on their own jobs?

The party funding report by the Committee for Standards in Public Life was barely off the printers and politicians from all parties were saying they were broadly supportive, but more importantly could not back the main suggestion that state funding of political parties be increased.

Party funding will always be tough to square given the reliance of Labour on union money and the Conservatives (and increasingly the Liberal Democrats) on major donors. State funding is inevitable to reduce sleaze, real or inferred, and trust in politics. It only costs  the equivalent of a couple of first class stamps a year, …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarnigel hunter 27th Jul - 9:57pm
    These ideas, first thought of by the party in the 70s should be discussed on social media AND pointed out that it has taken the...
  • User AvatarDan Falchikov 27th Jul - 9:31pm
    I wonder if the beeb still has the footage of Liz Truss proposing the motion to abolish the monarchy at the 1994 (I think) conference?
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 27th Jul - 9:26pm
    @ Conor As a matter of fact it was in the 1959 Manifesto - when the Liberal Party was a real radical party under Jo...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 27th Jul - 9:19pm
    Lorenzo, how did Bill Clinton's deregulation of Wall St go?
  • User AvatarAndrewMcC 27th Jul - 9:18pm
    Paul, See here for the last few times.. http://vote-2012.proboards.com/thread/8265/elections-july-26-27-28. No Lib Dem has stood there since before 2003, anyway. I think results like this show...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 27th Jul - 9:17pm
    Absolutely agree with this, we need stronger trade unions also - up to European standards would be great for workers. A major expansion of workplace...
Thu 28th Jul 2016
Sat 30th Jul 2016
Mon 1st Aug 2016
Wed 3rd Aug 2016
Sat 6th Aug 2016
Wed 10th Aug 2016
Fri 12th Aug 2016
19:00
Sat 13th Aug 2016
Tue 16th Aug 2016
Thu 18th Aug 2016
Sun 21st Aug 2016