Author Archives: Phil Ling

Opinion: The pressures of being a parliamentary candidate

20140201-202125.jpg Sarah YongIt is with a sad, and heavy, heart that yesterday I heard of Sarah Yong’s decision to stand down as PPC for Somerton and Frome for personal reasons. What is even sadder is that people are demanding to know the personal reasons, either because the privacy of an individual is less important than what this means to the party or to show it’s not because of the party prospects. If an employee (even CEO) of an organisation stepped down for personal reasons it is normally respected and the organisation moves on.

Posted in Op-eds | 13 Comments

Opinion: Canvassing – a few steps to success

Dundonald ward, in Merton, was awarded the “most canvassed ward in London” at the London Liberal Democrats regional conference.  As one of the people co-ordinating the campaign in the ward, it was great that the hard work was recognised, but I was also a bit surprised.

Not surprised as in “can’t believe we’d won”, but surprised in the fact it didn’t feel like hard work, once the initial groundwork had been done. In reality, although there were times where we were out doing surveys, recruiting or canvassing twice a week, it averaged about once a week. The canvass teams were never huge, 3-5 people, with the

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments

Opinion: Two ways to help fix the global crisis

It has long become clear that the financial crisis has been on a scale deeper and larger than many people have suspected. It has also been exacerbated by muddled policy responses from all Governments and policy makers. Whilst the need to control debt is not in doubt, capital expenditure projects should be pursued and tighter bank regulations need introducing (with much clearer splits between retail and investment banks); all economies are still struggling.

Step one: better Quantitative Easing

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 10 Comments

Opinion: What right do politicians have to decide rules on their own jobs?

The party funding report by the Committee for Standards in Public Life was barely off the printers and politicians from all parties were saying they were broadly supportive, but more importantly could not back the main suggestion that state funding of political parties be increased.

Party funding will always be tough to square given the reliance of Labour on union money and the Conservatives (and increasingly the Liberal Democrats) on major donors. State funding is inevitable to reduce sleaze, real or inferred, and trust in politics. It only costs  the equivalent of a couple of first class stamps a year, …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , and | 2 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 27th Mar - 4:24am
    The logical corollary would be that in an ideal society, corporations should, without regulation, be able to market any adulterated poisonous rubbish that they pleased,...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 27th Mar - 4:15am
    It would be a very bizarre world indeed where packaging regulations could be reasonably condemned as "authoritarian." Luckily it isn't the real world.
  • User AvatarDavid-1 27th Mar - 4:14am
    "In a few years when airplanes are noise and pollution free" That utopia has been coming "in a few years" since 1965.
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 27th Mar - 1:30am
    @ Malcolm "Let's remember Maudling did indeed leave a mess - at least he was honest." I agree. Though by the standards of future Chancellors...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 27th Mar - 1:18am
    @ Philip From a long-term supply-side point of view, I agree. Higher productivity is essential, and part of that requires allowing unproductive firms to go...
  • User AvatarSara Scarlett 27th Mar - 12:32am
    This op-ed in a nutshell is this: = "I know that plain packaging of everything is authoritarian but what's so wrong with authoritarianism anyway?"
Sat 28th Mar 2015
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015