Author Archives: Samuel Barratt

Opinion: Making the EBacc work

Michael Gove seems intent on bringing forward a replacement for the GCSE, going so far as to make its introduction a matter of confidence in the face of criticism.  All parties can agree, however, it is important to set out what these reforms should look like and make sure they deliver a qualification that is fit for purpose.

There are at least two key areas that I think Liberal Democrats should seek to influence.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 17 Comments

Opinion: Tuition fees – a progressive model for welfare?

Given the proportion of public sector spending it accounts for, in austere times welfare spending has come under the spotlight, with sizeable cuts having already being made.

Looking at who is accessing benefits to ensure those in receipt of them should be is to be welcomed. A blind eye should not, however, be turned to wealthier individuals in receipt of things like winter fuel allowance whilst cuts are made to some of the poorest in our society.

It is right that Liberal Democrats have distanced ourselves from Cameron’s musings that everyone under 25 should not be able to rely on support from …

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 49 Comments

Opinion: The importance of social liberalism

The debate regarding the importance and roles of ‘social’ and ‘economic’ liberalism can, on occasion, be misrepresented. Whether deliberate or incidental the relationship between the two philosophies can sometimes be presented as discrete, zero-sum options. I believe they should be considered as dialectic.

In The Orange Book, a publication that is almost Frankensteinian in how it’s perceived and what it actually contains, David Laws offers definitions for social and economic liberalism, that broadly serve well in discussion, they are:

    economic liberalism: ‘the belief in the value of free trade, open competition, market mechanisms, and the effectiveness of the

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 38 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarANMAW 30th Jun - 6:53am
    Stevan Because they've destroyed the us in Scotland?! More seriously I think it's more that many of their policies seem to focus on centralising control/power,...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 30th Jun - 1:57am
    I agree wholeheatedly with the article. It is not right to say that it denies the benefits of free movement. It recognises them but also...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 30th Jun - 1:45am
    I have been posing the question on Twitter (@markygoodrich) and trying to find information on what the advantages of the Norway option are. As far...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 30th Jun - 12:35am
    Some very good posts above by Matthew Huntbach (apart from the Clegg bashing!)
  • User AvatarHugh 29th Jun - 11:39pm
    Jayne, like like the drift of your article, but I do not think a single person voted Leave because of the recent Housing or Planning...
  • User AvatarKevin colwill 29th Jun - 11:34pm
    "And the people chose FPTP over a fairer system – that’s democracy" but it's not set in stone like some unchanging law of physics. One...