<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC drops Lib Dems from Question Time, again #bbcqt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Any Questions: it&#8217;s not just BBC Question Time that&#8217;s the problem</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108737</link>
		<dc:creator>Any Questions: it&#8217;s not just BBC Question Time that&#8217;s the problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108737</guid>
		<description>[...] covered before the habit of BBC Question Time of dropping a Liberal Democrat from the panel (three times in four weeks most recently) and also of loading up the panel with a far from politically balanced set of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covered before the habit of BBC Question Time of dropping a Liberal Democrat from the panel (three times in four weeks most recently) and also of loading up the panel with a far from politically balanced set of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108678</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108678</guid>
		<description>I too got exactly the same response as before.  The BBC clearly isn&#039;t listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too got exactly the same response as before.  The BBC clearly isn&#8217;t listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The LDV Friday Five: 26 February 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108635</link>
		<dc:creator>The LDV Friday Five: 26 February 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108635</guid>
		<description>[...] Brown will start the TV election debates with an advantage over David Cameron (2) by Mark Pack. 3. BBC drops Lib Dems from Question Time, again #bbcqt (11) by Mark Pack. 4. The Saturday debate: Burkas – to ban or not to ban? (48) by Mark Pack. 5. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brown will start the TV election debates with an advantage over David Cameron (2) by Mark Pack. 3. BBC drops Lib Dems from Question Time, again #bbcqt (11) by Mark Pack. 4. The Saturday debate: Burkas – to ban or not to ban? (48) by Mark Pack. 5. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Falchikov</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108501</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Falchikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve now had 2 letters from the complaints office, quoting the QT &quot;Executive Editor&quot; Gavin Allen - standard form of words, the same as what everyone gets I suspect,  meaningless and doesn&#039;t answer questions such as &quot;why and when did you dump Sarah Teather and MIng Campbell?&quot;.    
My follow-up letter to the Jo Swinson debacle which took a month to elicit a reply did offer a further possibility of 
writing to the Editorial Complaints Unit @ White City.   Has anyone tried this?    Probably no use, but might at least
have nuisance value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve now had 2 letters from the complaints office, quoting the QT &#8220;Executive Editor&#8221; Gavin Allen &#8211; standard form of words, the same as what everyone gets I suspect,  meaningless and doesn&#8217;t answer questions such as &#8220;why and when did you dump Sarah Teather and MIng Campbell?&#8221;.<br />
My follow-up letter to the Jo Swinson debacle which took a month to elicit a reply did offer a further possibility of<br />
writing to the Editorial Complaints Unit @ White City.   Has anyone tried this?    Probably no use, but might at least<br />
have nuisance value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilcock</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108499</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108499</guid>
		<description>I’ve just published an &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/b0GBc2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;advance photo of the full line-up&lt;/a&gt; from tonight’s show. Looks completely balanced… 

Incidentally, your full-page ads springing out and stopping me reading your articles, twice at a time on occasion, are now meaning I’m much less likely to stop by here. Just thought you should know what a wind-up they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve just published an <a href="http://bit.ly/b0GBc2" rel="nofollow">advance photo of the full line-up</a> from tonight’s show. Looks completely balanced… </p>
<p>Incidentally, your full-page ads springing out and stopping me reading your articles, twice at a time on occasion, are now meaning I’m much less likely to stop by here. Just thought you should know what a wind-up they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108492</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108492</guid>
		<description>Done. I see that Plaid got .6 of the votes in 2005 and UKIP a mere .8 and. Janet Sreet Porter 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Done. I see that Plaid got .6 of the votes in 2005 and UKIP a mere .8 and. Janet Sreet Porter 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108491</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108491</guid>
		<description>Another thing which annoys me about QT is that they have the same panellists on time after time.  I like a bit of variety and as good as they are, I don&#039;t want to see Chris Huhne or Sarah Teather on the programme frequently.  I also fail to see why they&#039;ve have Peter Hain and Lord Falconer on several times in the past year.

We have a lot of MPs who have never been on the programme.  BBC, will you please ask some of them to appear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing which annoys me about QT is that they have the same panellists on time after time.  I like a bit of variety and as good as they are, I don&#8217;t want to see Chris Huhne or Sarah Teather on the programme frequently.  I also fail to see why they&#8217;ve have Peter Hain and Lord Falconer on several times in the past year.</p>
<p>We have a lot of MPs who have never been on the programme.  BBC, will you please ask some of them to appear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Painfully Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108476</link>
		<dc:creator>Painfully Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108476</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that Shappi Khorsandi marked the nadir in recent editions, though agree that Tom Conti inhabited a similar abyssal plain  of quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that Shappi Khorsandi marked the nadir in recent editions, though agree that Tom Conti inhabited a similar abyssal plain  of quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanbikinoraion</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108474</link>
		<dc:creator>sanbikinoraion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108474</guid>
		<description>Tom Conti was *awful*. The real nadir of know-nothing nobodies on QT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Conti was *awful*. The real nadir of know-nothing nobodies on QT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108462</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108462</guid>
		<description>DONE
_________________________________
Dear Sir or Madam,

I honestly don&#039;t like writing in to the BBC to complain, as I hold your broadcasting as generally excellent, so it brings me some discomfort that I am forced to do so for the second time in the space of a month.

As I&#039;m sure you are aware the BBC are broadcasting Question Time without a political representative from the Liberal Democrats tomorrow, this is both wrong and could (and indeed should) be considered biased.

I expect a stock reply telling me that the Liberal Democrats do get their fair share of representation but they only pull in 22% of the electorate... Well, to you I ask this when will we see a week without either a Conservative or a Labour representative? They&#039;re not that far removed from the Liberal Democrats in terms of vote share, save for a landslide...

Once again there is significance to the week the BBC choose to show such bias, this week the show is, as I&#039;m sure you will be aware, taking place in Wales. A place where our representation is second only to the Labour party (the Conservatives certainly aren&#039;t on the same level) and a place that has benefited from many Liberal Democrat policies both in the Welsh Assembly and at local council levels. 

I hope that the BBC will consider the points that I have made and strive to ensure that future programming is not dogged by such thinly veiled bias in future (I say this on the basis that our representation on, this, your flagship politics show has been non existent for three of the last four weeks).

Yours faithfully

Dale Cox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DONE<br />
_________________________________<br />
Dear Sir or Madam,</p>
<p>I honestly don&#8217;t like writing in to the BBC to complain, as I hold your broadcasting as generally excellent, so it brings me some discomfort that I am forced to do so for the second time in the space of a month.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure you are aware the BBC are broadcasting Question Time without a political representative from the Liberal Democrats tomorrow, this is both wrong and could (and indeed should) be considered biased.</p>
<p>I expect a stock reply telling me that the Liberal Democrats do get their fair share of representation but they only pull in 22% of the electorate&#8230; Well, to you I ask this when will we see a week without either a Conservative or a Labour representative? They&#8217;re not that far removed from the Liberal Democrats in terms of vote share, save for a landslide&#8230;</p>
<p>Once again there is significance to the week the BBC choose to show such bias, this week the show is, as I&#8217;m sure you will be aware, taking place in Wales. A place where our representation is second only to the Labour party (the Conservatives certainly aren&#8217;t on the same level) and a place that has benefited from many Liberal Democrat policies both in the Welsh Assembly and at local council levels. </p>
<p>I hope that the BBC will consider the points that I have made and strive to ensure that future programming is not dogged by such thinly veiled bias in future (I say this on the basis that our representation on, this, your flagship politics show has been non existent for three of the last four weeks).</p>
<p>Yours faithfully</p>
<p>Dale Cox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108452</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108452</guid>
		<description>Dull celebrities don&#039;t have any representation in the General Election yet the BBC still insist on bring some nobody or has been in every week. Tim Conti? Come on  now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dull celebrities don&#8217;t have any representation in the General Election yet the BBC still insist on bring some nobody or has been in every week. Tim Conti? Come on  now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jenkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108449</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jenkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve complained &lt;a href=&quot;http://mytaleofme.chrisjenkinson.org/2010/02/24/complaint-to-bbc-about-dropping-lib-dems-from-question-time-again/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on my blog&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve complained <a href="http://mytaleofme.chrisjenkinson.org/2010/02/24/complaint-to-bbc-about-dropping-lib-dems-from-question-time-again/" rel="nofollow">on my blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108434</guid>
		<description>Do you think we would have a better response if we were to contact the BBC Trust as opposed the the BBC itself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think we would have a better response if we were to contact the BBC Trust as opposed the the BBC itself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tina Louise</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-drops-lib-dems-from-question-time-again-bbcqt-18079.html#comment-108433</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18079#comment-108433</guid>
		<description>I complained and got the same response I have read elsewhere - something about balance and representation. It was hollow empty words that did not convince me of impartiallity and fairness at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I complained and got the same response I have read elsewhere &#8211; something about balance and representation. It was hollow empty words that did not convince me of impartiallity and fairness at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

