BBC: ‘Lords boundary vote delayed ‘indefinitely”

Mark Valladares reported here yesterday the ‘temporary withdrawal of the Election Registration and Administration Bill’. That temporary appears to have become a bit more permanent, according to the BBC:

A Lords vote to delay the review of constituency boundaries until 2018 has been postponed “indefinitely”. The vote on an amendment to delay the changes, tabled by Labour and signed by Lib Dem and other peers, was originally expected on Wednesday and postponed until Monday. But government sources say it has now been delayed to an unspecified date. It follows reports that Downing St was unaware Lib Dems supported the motion and ordered the vote to be pulled.

The boundary review has been controversial since its outset, with the Commons set to be reduced in size from 650 to 600 MPs and the population size of constituencies made roughly equal. However, the Lib Dems have said the changes cannot happen before the next election – scheduled for 2015 – and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg has promised to oppose the final proposals. …

Reports suggest that David Cameron had been unaware of Liberal Democrat support for the amendment and asked for the debate to be delayed.

A Lib Dem source refused to confirm to the BBC that the prime minister and deputy prime minister had argued over the issue, but said it was better to postpone the boundary review now so that money was not spent preparing for something that would not happen.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Paul McKeown 4th Nov '12 - 9:07pm

    Teehee!

  • Nick (not Clegg) 5th Nov '12 - 12:02pm

    @ Simon Banks

    That would have been Lord’s.

  • Nick (not Clegg) 5th Nov '12 - 5:30pm

    Yes, Mark. Life is very confusing at the moment. I keep reading headlines about “Ashes Under Threat” and thinking it’s to do with cricket: very much on my mind at present while waiting to discover whether I am to be successful in the “ballot” (lottery) to purchase tickets for next year’s Oval Test.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 25th Mar - 1:20am
    Roland; I misunderstood you chap. I don't agree. Germany, France and even Italy all had and have stronger trade unions. Unions have not been that...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 25th Mar - 12:25am
    "The second problem is that the Bank of England itself takes the view that Quantitative Easing is regressive, because it pushes asset prices upwards, and...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 25th Mar - 12:24am
    Dear Rebecca, As I was a Politics student and Union of Liberal Students member at Leeds University in 1966 I read your article with delight,...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 24th Mar - 11:23pm
    The article is overblown, the responses almost measured in comparison. The policy is a compromise. Yes those to the left of Ho Chi Min and...
  • User AvatarRoland 24th Mar - 10:23pm
    @Glenn - The trouble is that 'business' also includes the workers. Remember just how many of trade union call to arms has been about the...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 24th Mar - 10:23pm
    @ Richard Underhill Yes, indeed. In fact why have a party at all ? It only causes vexation .