BBC: ‘Lords boundary vote delayed ‘indefinitely”

Mark Valladares reported here yesterday the ‘temporary withdrawal of the Election Registration and Administration Bill’. That temporary appears to have become a bit more permanent, according to the BBC:

A Lords vote to delay the review of constituency boundaries until 2018 has been postponed “indefinitely”. The vote on an amendment to delay the changes, tabled by Labour and signed by Lib Dem and other peers, was originally expected on Wednesday and postponed until Monday. But government sources say it has now been delayed to an unspecified date. It follows reports that Downing St was unaware Lib Dems supported the motion and ordered the vote to be pulled.

The boundary review has been controversial since its outset, with the Commons set to be reduced in size from 650 to 600 MPs and the population size of constituencies made roughly equal. However, the Lib Dems have said the changes cannot happen before the next election – scheduled for 2015 – and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg has promised to oppose the final proposals. …

Reports suggest that David Cameron had been unaware of Liberal Democrat support for the amendment and asked for the debate to be delayed.

A Lib Dem source refused to confirm to the BBC that the prime minister and deputy prime minister had argued over the issue, but said it was better to postpone the boundary review now so that money was not spent preparing for something that would not happen.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31283 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • Paul McKeown 4th Nov '12 - 9:07pm

    Teehee!

  • Nick (not Clegg) 5th Nov '12 - 12:02pm

    @ Simon Banks

    That would have been Lord’s.

  • Nick (not Clegg) 5th Nov '12 - 5:30pm

    Yes, Mark. Life is very confusing at the moment. I keep reading headlines about “Ashes Under Threat” and thinking it’s to do with cricket: very much on my mind at present while waiting to discover whether I am to be successful in the “ballot” (lottery) to purchase tickets for next year’s Oval Test.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStevan Rose 24th Oct - 7:29pm
    I could become less outraged if, for example, I happen to be invited to kit myself out with a lovely velvet robe and access to...
  • User Avatarg 24th Oct - 7:00pm
    T-J, I think you rate the SNP's chances too highly. Voters have always, always undervoted for the SNP in Westminster compared to Holyrood/polling, presumably because...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 24th Oct - 6:57pm
    Matthew Green ' I resent the implication that I swallowed a Thatcher and Tebbit narrative uncritically. The reason why those two got as far as...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 24th Oct - 6:45pm
    While this may be an improvement, it's only one because the present system is so awful. First off, an 18-week wait time seems unaccountably excessive....
  • User AvatarGF 24th Oct - 6:39pm
    What David Allen said. Tragically, there is much truth in what Matthew says; too many are content only to contemplate their collective navel and stay...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 24th Oct - 6:33pm
    Matthew Huntbach 24th Oct '14 - 4:18pm Matthew, I do not for a moment accept your bracketing of YES voters in the Scotland Referendum with...