<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Question Time – LDV open thread, 2 July 2009 #bbcqt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-question-time-ldv-open-thread-2-july-2009-bbcqt-15538.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-question-time-ldv-open-thread-2-july-2009-bbcqt-15538.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-question-time-ldv-open-thread-2-july-2009-bbcqt-15538.html#comment-94144</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=15538#comment-94144</guid>
		<description>I thought David Laws was unclear about the railways.  He repeated Vince Cable&#039;s effective line about privatising profit and nationalising debt, without a coherent vision of rail transport.

His rejection of nationalisation left the impression that he is a fundamental free marketeer who would see a public service go bankrupt and collapse.  It was let to Hitchins of all people to defend the old BR.  Everyone knows that there are many aspects of rail transport that are much worse than before, largely the result of a disintegrated system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought David Laws was unclear about the railways.  He repeated Vince Cable&#8217;s effective line about privatising profit and nationalising debt, without a coherent vision of rail transport.</p>
<p>His rejection of nationalisation left the impression that he is a fundamental free marketeer who would see a public service go bankrupt and collapse.  It was let to Hitchins of all people to defend the old BR.  Everyone knows that there are many aspects of rail transport that are much worse than before, largely the result of a disintegrated system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter1919</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-question-time-ldv-open-thread-2-july-2009-bbcqt-15538.html#comment-94135</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter1919</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=15538#comment-94135</guid>
		<description>Go I hate Peter Hitchen

He says the Tories and Labour are tweedle dee and tweedle dumber (which I totally agree with) but then, with a sneer, dismisses the only possible viable alternative - The Lib Dems :-(

What does he suggest then? We all sit at home complaining that we have crap government forever more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go I hate Peter Hitchen</p>
<p>He says the Tories and Labour are tweedle dee and tweedle dumber (which I totally agree with) but then, with a sneer, dismisses the only possible viable alternative &#8211; The Lib Dems <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What does he suggest then? We all sit at home complaining that we have crap government forever more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Church</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/bbc-question-time-ldv-open-thread-2-july-2009-bbcqt-15538.html#comment-94130</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=15538#comment-94130</guid>
		<description>Well the QT website is wrong then. David Laws was first elected as MP for Yeovil in 2001, not 1997, succeeeding Jeremy John Durham Ashdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the QT website is wrong then. David Laws was first elected as MP for Yeovil in 2001, not 1997, succeeeding Jeremy John Durham Ashdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

