How long can Boris Johnson carry on defending the indefensible?

Caroline Pidgeon is a Liberal Democrat London Assembly Member and member of the London Fire Emergency and Planning Authority (LFEPA)

Walking out of a meeting as a protest is something I would not normally recommend, but last week I felt had no other option and left a key budget meeting of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA). Both the Lib Dem leader on the Fire Authority, Councillor Ed Butcher from Haringey, and I knew we had to make a protest at the decision of the Conservative Chair Brian Coleman to prohibit TV cameras from filming the meeting, and Coleman’s decision to prevent questions being asked about the disgraced Brent councillor, Bertha Joseph, who was present and voted for the half billion pound budget for London’s fire service.

Most of the media reporting of this saga has inevitably focused on the Conservative councillor Bertha Joseph. However her record is not the main story.

After all her behaviour has already been put under detailed scrutiny. Councillor Joseph was found guilty of misconduct as a councillor and she lost her appeal against this ruling from Brent Council’s standards committee. Her six-month suspension from Brent Council actually started last October.

She has remained on the Fire Authority because the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, has simply refused to sack her. In any other part of the country a suspended councillor would automatically be disqualified from serving on a fire authority. In London, because Ms Joseph was appointed to the Authority by the Mayor of London this was not the case. Shortly after Councillor Bertha Joseph was suspended from Brent Council she was even promoted to Deputy Chair of LFEPA.

The defence for this incredible development was that at the time she was appealing against her suspension. However, in early February this excuse no longer stood up when her appeal failed.

At this stage Boris Johnson faced a crucial test. A test he completely failed. The Mayor should have automatically sacked her, but instead he allowed her to remain on the London Fire Authority simply to ensure that a Conservative majority was maintained.  Put simply Party advantage was put before anything else. He tolerated something that would not be permitted in any other part of the country. He defended the indefensible.

Yet this wasn’t just the end of the matter. Having shown poor judgment there was a subsequent decision to try to cover up the issue – although in the end this was far from successful. The decision by Brian Coleman to block cameras filming a meeting of elected representatives was simply disgraceful. To then prevent questioning by elected representatives of his decision showed the Conservatives were happy to bring an elected body into total disrepute.

Boris Johnson appointed Brian Coleman to be chair of the London Fire Authority.  It is now time that the Mayor states whether he defends the record of Brian Coleman that has already led to him being sacked from the National Joint Council for Local Authority Fire and Rescue Services.

For readers around the country I know this whole saga might seem like an inward looking London issue. But do remember that, at present, Boris Johnson is the most powerful elected Conservative politician in the UK. His record needs to be closely examined.

Boris Johnson was elected pledging to clean up politics. At the time of his election, the Conservatives made continual allegations about serious cronyism that they claimed was entrenched in City Hall. Boris Johnson’s past pledges on tackling croynism in politics have a remarkable similarity to some of the claims now being made by David Cameron as he seeks to become Prime Minister. You have been warned. The Tories claim they want to clean up politics. In reality they are the part of the problem.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMike S 8th Dec - 12:11am
    @Tim13 Tim, I can only speak for myself here. I believe the Psyche of many people who voted leave in areas such as these is...
  • User AvatarTim13 8th Dec - 12:03am
    Road - testing a theory which has gradually developed in my thoughts over this, the issue of "cake and eat it", and the idea that...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 8th Dec - 12:01am
    Tom Brake was a teller for the opponents, I believe.
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 7th Dec - 11:57pm
    Elizabeth: so what should the choices in a referendum on the deal be? Accept the deal or default to a WTO-rules-only cliff edge when the...
  • User Avatarmatt 7th Dec - 11:54pm
    was their a whip on this vote? Tom Brake abstained on the lisbon treaty referendum motion in 2007 against the party whip. Tom was on...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 7th Dec - 11:40pm
    The four Lib Dem rebels appear to be Normal Lamb, Thomas Brake (interesting one), Greg Mulholland and John Pugh.