<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boris Johnson &#8211; two months on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Labour Member</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54724</link>
		<dc:creator>Labour Member</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54724</guid>
		<description>Boris is doing exactly what I thought he would do - ie nothing much. Let&#039;s be honest here, he hasn&#039;t got the ability to manage more than that and he also feels (rightly, sadly) he can ride on the bck of the government&#039;s unpopularity.

When he&#039;s gone too far - eg his attempt to get populist on the Olympics it has gone very badly for him and he cannot afford to do that too many more times without it being noticed that he is incontinent of bullsh*t.

FRor those of us who want rid of him (and I am including the LDs here obviously) the only thing to be done now is to bide time and not (and this is where I would scold LDs) to follow him down the road of empty populism.

Next time round Boris will have no novelty value and if the election is about big and serious issues he ought to lose.

In an ideal world he&#039;d lose to a unified candidate of the progressive left of centre and not to someone with a narrow party label, but I guess that will remain my dream and not the reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boris is doing exactly what I thought he would do &#8211; ie nothing much. Let&#8217;s be honest here, he hasn&#8217;t got the ability to manage more than that and he also feels (rightly, sadly) he can ride on the bck of the government&#8217;s unpopularity.</p>
<p>When he&#8217;s gone too far &#8211; eg his attempt to get populist on the Olympics it has gone very badly for him and he cannot afford to do that too many more times without it being noticed that he is incontinent of bullsh*t.</p>
<p>FRor those of us who want rid of him (and I am including the LDs here obviously) the only thing to be done now is to bide time and not (and this is where I would scold LDs) to follow him down the road of empty populism.</p>
<p>Next time round Boris will have no novelty value and if the election is about big and serious issues he ought to lose.</p>
<p>In an ideal world he&#8217;d lose to a unified candidate of the progressive left of centre and not to someone with a narrow party label, but I guess that will remain my dream and not the reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54707</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54707</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a Lib Dem.  Mr. Stop Boris may be, but I suspect not.  We&#039;re slightly crashing the yellow party from the Boris watching part of the blogosphere, for which I apologise, and we&#039;ll return thence in a moment.

What&#039;s dodgy about the elected government of Venezuela, anyway?  Hardly Saudi Arabia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a Lib Dem.  Mr. Stop Boris may be, but I suspect not.  We&#8217;re slightly crashing the yellow party from the Boris watching part of the blogosphere, for which I apologise, and we&#8217;ll return thence in a moment.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s dodgy about the elected government of Venezuela, anyway?  Hardly Saudi Arabia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eagles Man</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54702</link>
		<dc:creator>Eagles Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54702</guid>
		<description>&quot;... axing a deal which got London cheaper oil during an oil price crisis (and which my fellow Boris-Watcher Tom has calculated may have even left us in profit)?&quot;

So it&#039;s alright to do deals with dodgy regimes as long as we share the proceeds and even make a profit?

Very Lib Dem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; axing a deal which got London cheaper oil during an oil price crisis (and which my fellow Boris-Watcher Tom has calculated may have even left us in profit)?&#8221;</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s alright to do deals with dodgy regimes as long as we share the proceeds and even make a profit?</p>
<p>Very Lib Dem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54674</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54674</guid>
		<description>But the post is criticising Boris for doing daft and/or dodgy things (like bunging his mates big cheques without proper review and the Olympic briefing cock-up) - the precise opposite of P^6.

[Similarly, I can&#039;t say how I know this, but the environment officer issue is definitely not a case of &quot;we need time to think of the right person&quot;; it&#039;s more a case of &quot;nobody qualified to do this will do it, as the whole GLA environment team are about to quit, the whole thing will be a disaster, and they&#039;ll get the blame...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the post is criticising Boris for doing daft and/or dodgy things (like bunging his mates big cheques without proper review and the Olympic briefing cock-up) &#8211; the precise opposite of P^6.</p>
<p>[Similarly, I can&#8217;t say how I know this, but the environment officer issue is definitely not a case of &#8220;we need time to think of the right person&#8221;; it&#8217;s more a case of &#8220;nobody qualified to do this will do it, as the whole GLA environment team are about to quit, the whole thing will be a disaster, and they&#8217;ll get the blame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Stop Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54668</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Stop Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54668</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exactly the right things&quot;? What are they then?

Doubling bus fares for poor people and axing a deal which got London cheaper oil during an oil price crisis (and which my fellow Boris-Watcher Tom has calculated may have even left us in profit)?

Antagonising some of the funders of the Rise festival by axing its core anti-racism message, so they&#039;ve withdrawn their funding and thus necessitated a greater proportion coming from the taxpayer? (Oh and clearly having absolutely no idea that the Rise change was happening, even after it had appeared in the national press.)

Having a &#039;forensic audit&#039; looking into allegations of cronyism run entirely by, er, Tory party cronies?

Seems a funny definition of &quot;exactly the right things&quot; to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exactly the right things&#8221;? What are they then?</p>
<p>Doubling bus fares for poor people and axing a deal which got London cheaper oil during an oil price crisis (and which my fellow Boris-Watcher Tom has calculated may have even left us in profit)?</p>
<p>Antagonising some of the funders of the Rise festival by axing its core anti-racism message, so they&#8217;ve withdrawn their funding and thus necessitated a greater proportion coming from the taxpayer? (Oh and clearly having absolutely no idea that the Rise change was happening, even after it had appeared in the national press.)</p>
<p>Having a &#8216;forensic audit&#8217; looking into allegations of cronyism run entirely by, er, Tory party cronies?</p>
<p>Seems a funny definition of &#8220;exactly the right things&#8221; to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing tory</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54666</link>
		<dc:creator>passing tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54666</guid>
		<description>Let me state it another way. During the course of his campaign Boris took his time at the start to lay good foundations and then used this background work to good effect. It appears that he is taking a similar approach this time round, and good on him. As the motto goes, &quot;time spent in recce is time well spent&quot; (or, more colloquially &quot;proper planning prevents piss poor performance&quot;).

Of course, he will have to have a thick skin as lots of people take their pot shots, and try to score party political points. But, for my money, he is doing exactly the right things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me state it another way. During the course of his campaign Boris took his time at the start to lay good foundations and then used this background work to good effect. It appears that he is taking a similar approach this time round, and good on him. As the motto goes, &#8220;time spent in recce is time well spent&#8221; (or, more colloquially &#8220;proper planning prevents piss poor performance&#8221;).</p>
<p>Of course, he will have to have a thick skin as lots of people take their pot shots, and try to score party political points. But, for my money, he is doing exactly the right things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil W</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54662</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54662</guid>
		<description>LettersFromATory has a bizarre notion of the role of opposition if he believes Boris should get a free pass for 12 months before suffering any scrutiny. 

The Forensic Audit Panel in particular appears to be as worthy of its name as Orwell&#039;s Ministry of Truth and deserves far more ridicule than the mild rollicking Mike has administered here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LettersFromATory has a bizarre notion of the role of opposition if he believes Boris should get a free pass for 12 months before suffering any scrutiny. </p>
<p>The Forensic Audit Panel in particular appears to be as worthy of its name as Orwell&#8217;s Ministry of Truth and deserves far more ridicule than the mild rollicking Mike has administered here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54659</guid>
		<description>What &#039;big policy announcements&#039; would these be, perchance?  Wasn&#039;t that the point of an election manifesto?  He was elected to run London, not announce policies, and it&#039;s no good the city treading water for a year.

You can make one fairly obvious judgement already, which is that Boris has to get a better grip on the mechanics of the job.  &#039;Big policy announcements&#039; or not, if you&#039;re incapable of actually implementing them what&#039;s the point?  Who in his appointments has the necessary skills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8216;big policy announcements&#8217; would these be, perchance?  Wasn&#8217;t that the point of an election manifesto?  He was elected to run London, not announce policies, and it&#8217;s no good the city treading water for a year.</p>
<p>You can make one fairly obvious judgement already, which is that Boris has to get a better grip on the mechanics of the job.  &#8216;Big policy announcements&#8217; or not, if you&#8217;re incapable of actually implementing them what&#8217;s the point?  Who in his appointments has the necessary skills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/boris-johnson-two-months-on-2953.html#comment-54658</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=2953#comment-54658</guid>
		<description>Team Boris has certainly got off to an underwhelming start, but I&#039;m waiting for the big policy announcements over the next 6-12 months before I make any judgement and I think you should do the same.

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team Boris has certainly got off to an underwhelming start, but I&#8217;m waiting for the big policy announcements over the next 6-12 months before I make any judgement and I think you should do the same.</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

