Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15581 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 28th Aug - 3:07am
    It appears to me that the majority of voters are concerned about themselves and their immediate family. If someone is well off they might consider...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 28th Aug - 1:42am
    @George Potter Until the recent role reversal, the SNP were a minor party and wouldn't have got much public exposure. Even now they won't get...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 28th Aug - 1:35am
    @Matthew Huntbach I know that you have been talking about this for a very long time, but surely there are other issues as well, it...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 28th Aug - 1:27am
    Mark Argent raises an interesting issue and links this to barriers in society generally. Of course there are other groups of people who struggle to...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 28th Aug - 1:15am
    @TCO "The Labour Party seek, and have always sought, to crush us." But it's the Conservative Party that succeeded.
  • User AvatarGeorge Potter 28th Aug - 1:11am
    The SNP have boycotted the Lords for years. It has done absolutely nothing to improve the situation - either legislatively or in terms of Lords...