Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBarry Snelson 28th Sep - 2:10pm
    Paul, I align with Glenn here. I think the op-ed you penned here triggers a debate beyond Trump's chances but moves into segmentation, and thus...
  • User AvatarBernard Salmon 28th Sep - 2:06pm
    I wonder whether Trump managed to damage himself with those non-college-educated whites with his debate performance. I suspect not many of them, especially those who...
  • User Avatartheakes 28th Sep - 1:58pm
    Only thing, the self same baby boomers voted heavily in favour of joining the community in 1975.
  • User AvatarPhil Boothroyd 28th Sep - 1:25pm
    J Dunn - all the people I know (and they are few and far between) that do something like that are locums - they aren't...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Sep - 1:14pm
    @Tsar Nicholas "Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. Trump’s response to the question contained the following paragraph: 'I looked the other night. I...
  • User AvatarGlenn 28th Sep - 12:58pm
    Paul. I'm not interested in a detailed breakdown of anyone' s supporters because it's almost invariably used to undermine those voters.. It like when people...