Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15581 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 19th Apr - 11:38am
    BigMac - Sadly the argument using the 75% of the manifesto delivered as a measure of our success has been comprehensively debunked many times since...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 19th Apr - 11:09am
    Slightly off topic, but too many people see disagreeing with the leadership's management of the coalition with disagreeing with the necessity of it. I think...
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 11:06am
    BigMak 19th Apr '15 - 9:46am........Now we have according to an independent review had 75% of our 2010 manifesto enacted…. And that attitude, dear reader,...
  • User AvatarSteve Way 19th Apr - 11:03am
    @Phillip Thomas That would be dishonest, at the moment I teeter between Lib Dem and deliberately spoilt ballot...I will consider donating to Charles though Caron..
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 11:02am
    Sesenco 18th Apr '15 - 10:49pm ........The Labourites who never tire of telling us how much they hate us, some of them are going to...
  • User Avatarmalc 19th Apr - 10:45am
    BigMak I disagree totally. The LibDems would have won at least as many seats in 2010 with CK as leader and then could have joined...
Sat 25th Apr 2015