Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15581 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 26th Nov - 2:45pm
    I dislike the term 'benefit tourism', because it implies that large numbers of immigrants come to the UK to exploit the welfare system rather than...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 26th Nov - 2:27pm
    They look very similar. Are they by any chance related? Shurely shome mishtake.
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 26th Nov - 2:24pm
    Roland: Since this country grew rich on the proceeds of the slave trade (admittedly the slaves weren't immigrants, unless you count them as immigrants to...
  • User AvatarPaul In Wokingham 26th Nov - 1:56pm
    The latest Ashcroft poll reports Lib Dem support in England at 6%, compared with 24% at the 2010 GE. Now it is undoubtedly the case...
  • User AvatarGraham Martin-Royle 26th Nov - 1:56pm
    Way back in the 1970's my brother decided to use the free movement principles to try his luck working in Germany. He had no job...
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 26th Nov - 1:52pm
    If they do monitor I hope they are better at it than Google. My other half is interested in the history of art. Google keeps...