Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15581 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChrisB 31st Oct - 2:46pm
    It's one of those rare moments that I agree with Huppert. >We need a “carrot and stick” approach to hard drugs. Yeah, it'd be great...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:39pm
    @ Matthew "But that is the opposite of the original argument. There is no special “London tax” proposed. The idea is that wealthier people get...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 31st Oct - 2:36pm
    @matthew - how does the success of financial services in London cause industry to be closed down elsewhere?
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Oct - 2:31pm
    Yes Norman Lamb is probably right to criticise those halloween outfits. Although, people can take offence at everything. However, the statement "What’s scarier than the...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:20pm
    @ Dav It is a black hole if it pays less in tax revenues than it's rental value of land . Unlike the value of...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Oct - 2:18pm
    Dav London generates the wealth which keeps the UK running. Yes, and to what extent has that involved sucking up all the people with the...