Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 29th Nov - 1:18am
    Mick Taylor - there were strenuous efforts at imposing restrictions on money/weapons etc the Balkans. That's not to say, of course, that we shouldn't try...
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 28th Nov - 11:33pm
    All that counts is the medical evidence of the best experts in the field - and the protection of patients. Any other considerations are surely...
  • User AvatarBruce 28th Nov - 11:33pm
    there are a number of points here. Firstly the border is literally a line in the sand. It has no logical purpose being based on...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 28th Nov - 10:58pm
    Some years ago, the British Government refused to negotiate with the IRA and the IRA continued to carry out fairly indiscriminate acts of terrorism. Many...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 28th Nov - 10:01pm
    Is it still the cae that police officers need to choose a jacket that protects against knives? or a jacket that protects against guns?
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 28th Nov - 9:59pm
    In other words, Lloyd, we need to unpick Sykes Picot and start again. But first, there's the little matter of ISIS and Mr Assad.