Brian Coleman in “mad, bad and sad” expenses smokescreen

London Assembly Member Brian Coleman is refusing to publish details of his expenses, despite the Mayor, his advisors and the other 24 members of the Assembly agreeing to do so voluntarily.

Apparently a graduate of the Anthony Steen Charm School for Politicians, Coleman has blamed bloggers for being interested in how taxpayers’ money is spent:

“I won’t do it voluntarily. It’s none of the public’s business. They have coped well without knowing this kind of detail for more than 75 years. They are not entitled to drool over our personal lives. I’m not going to help the mad, bad and the sad, the bloggers on the internet. I’m not pandering to mob rule. It undermines democracy to suggest that all MPs, all politicians are the spawn of Beelzebub.

“Politicians with lower expenses tend to be the politicians who do least work. Those with higher expenses are the ones who do most work.” [London Evening Standard]

Hard to see how “the most work” extends to running up a £378 taxi bill, mostly as a result of asking a cab to wait from him with the meter running while he attended a banquet.

Even Mayor Boris Johnson is said to be “disappointed” at Coleman’s lack of transparency.

See Adam Bienkov’s analysis at Tory Troll on why Brian Coleman is an expensive liability for Boris.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in London and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15581 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKevin Lang 22nd Aug - 10:17am
    Galen, I'm as 'no' as they come when it comes to this referendum but you're simply not on. People like John, Lin and Denis are...
  • User AvatarTim13 22nd Aug - 10:03am
    Thoroughly agree, T-J.
  • User AvatarRobert 22nd Aug - 9:49am
    The party has had a wake up call on its internal procedures and will have no excuses for a repeat of this sorry affair in...
  • User AvatarT-J 22nd Aug - 9:46am
    And add yet another meaningless target for the statisticians to debate over? No, I'm strongly on the side of the original article on this. Need...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 22nd Aug - 9:28am
    PS I have just seen Tom Devine's thoughtful piece on why I now say yes to Independence for Scotland; as you would expect from such...
  • User AvatarNick Tregoning 22nd Aug - 9:09am
    "We must advise anyone against publishing or broadcasting defamatory remarks. Accusations that were rejected by both the Metropolitan Police and an independent QC would be...