What the public thinks of… Cameron & Clegg for ditching Lords reform & boundary changes & of the Lib Dems in Coalition

Here’s four intriguing findings from a ComRes poll for the Mirror and Independent released yesterday and conducted 15th-16 August…


By 34%-29% public thinks Cameron was WRONG to abandon House of Lords reform

Q: Do you agree or disagree that David Cameron was right to abandon the attempt to make changes to the House of Lords?

    Agree 29%
    Disagree 34%
    Don’t know 37%

Interestingly 21% of Conservative voters disagreed with their party leader’s decision. Also interesting: the views of Labour and Lib Dem voters on this question were near-identical, disagreeing with David Cameron’s decision to pull the plug on the Coalition Agreement’s promised Lords reform by 2:1 margin.


By 31%-29% public thinks Nick Clegg was RIGHT to veto boundary changes

Q: Do you agree or disagree that Nick Clegg was right to say that Liberal Democrat MPs will vote against the plans to reduce the number of MPs and change constituency boundaries?

    Agree 31%
    Disagree 29%
    Don’t know 40%

In spite of all the opprobrium that’s been thrown at the Lib Dem leader over the past fortnight by right-wing commentators (‘tantrum, betrayal, treachery etc’) his decision to go toe-to-toe with David Cameron, blocking boundary changes in response to the Tories torpedoing Lords reform, has not upset voters — in fact a narrow plurality of those with a view think he was in the right.


By 61%-18% the public don’t think the Coalition has shown the Lib Dems to be a credible party of government

Q: Do you agree or disagree that being in coalition with the Conservatives has shown the Liberal Democrats to be a credible party of government?

    Agree 18%
    Disagree 61%
    Don’t know 21%

For many of us who back the Coalition, the hope was that whatever unpopularity the party would acquire from being in government it would at least gain gravitas in the eyes of the public. Well, I don’t have an equivalent pre-Coalition figure to hand, but it’s hard to see this result in an optimistic light. The figure of 61% disagreeing includes almost half (49%) of those who say they voted Lib Dem in 2010.


By 43%-35% the public doesn’t prefer a Lib Dem / Labour coalition to the current Lib/Con Coalition

Q: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, ‘I would prefer Labour and the Liberal Democrats to form a government rather than the present coalition between Conservatives and Liberal Democrats’?

    Agree 35%
    Disagree 43%
    Don’t know 22%

The current Coalition may not be popular, but there’s little clamour for the Lib Dems to align with Labour instead. Nor is this the result of Labour voters spurning Lib Dems in revenge: almost three-quarters (73%) of Labour voters would like the two parties to team up. So too would a bare majority (51%) of the Lib Dems’ 2010 voters. But an overwhelming majority (88%) of Tory voters oppose the idea, and a plurality (40% to 36%) of current Lib Dem voters don’t like it either.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Polls.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/29890 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • Tony Dawson 20th Aug '12 - 9:53pm

    Surely, the obvious conclusion is that most people couldn’t give a monkeys?

  • Andrew Suffield 21st Aug '12 - 7:39am

    The “credible party of government” question has split along party lines, which means it’s being answered as “which party do you support?”

    Where is the column for people who have no party association?

  • The killer result is that 68% don’t agree with “…….the Coalition has shown the Lib Dems to be a credible party of government…..”. As I understand it, the LibDems’ desire to prove their fitness for government was a big factor in their entering the Coalition. It will be interesting, to put it mildly, to see what happens in the Corby by-election. Mrs Mensch’s decision to go (she is perfectly entitled to do whatever she wants in this regard) has done Messrs Cameron and Clegg no favours.

  • William Hobhouse. “Coalition Government is better government”. Your are entitled to your opinion, but from what I am seeing Coalition government, at present, is pretty awful. Might I cite the antics over the NHS as an example of dreadful governance. And I think that British voters are likely to agree with my sentiments. The good people of Corby will soon give us an indication of the Coalition’s popularity. Real people with real votes.

  • agree with previous three comments, but remember it is still a ComRes poll, produced and paid for by a newspaper, conducted when lots of people are on holiday, – they probably asked as a first question ‘which party did you vote for the last time you voted’ and then for the sake of simplicity excluded all the ‘others’ and the ‘non voters’. Interesting, but hardly a conclusive set of stats to base any decisions upon.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul in Twickenham 24th May - 6:59am
    Who needs to lie about Europe? Greece has 70% youth unemployment. It's only growth industries are prostitution and shisha production. In four regions of Spain...
  • User Avatarbcrombie 24th May - 3:03am
    IHelen, Reading the article it appears this was vetoed on cost (hence the cost/benefit analysis) and not on principal. In fact, the assessments were carried...
  • User AvatarAmalric 24th May - 2:17am
    Geoffrey Payne makes an interesting point that we Liberal Democrats want no one enslaved by poverty, but the benefit cuts mean that poverty reduction is...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 24th May - 12:49am
    No Richard, you are wrong. People will look back in 200 years time and understand that people opposed it on a religious basis, not because...
  • User AvatarMichael Parsons 24th May - 12:27am
    First I don't see any signs of a "post austerity Europe" and the scarcely hidden panic among the IMF etc. as to the consequences of...
Sun 26th May 2013
Tue 28th May 2013
Wed 29th May 2013
Thu 30th May 2013
Fri 31st May 2013
Sat 1st Jun 2013
10:00
Mon 3rd Jun 2013
Thu 6th Jun 2013
Fri 7th Jun 2013
Sat 8th Jun 2013
Sun 9th Jun 2013
Thu 13th Jun 2013
Sat 15th Jun 2013
Tue 18th Jun 2013
Thu 20th Jun 2013