David Cameron’s shadow cabinet not up to it?

A bit ironic, given the timing, but the Spectator blog, Coffee House has this:

Cameron should fix the shadow cabinet while the sun is shining. Tucked away in the Whip column of The Sun is this item:

“Now senior Tories are aghast at rumours that David Cameron was rubbishing them during a private dinner recently. He is said to have told a pal: “I’ve got six or seven people in the Shadow Cabinet capable of working in the government. The rest are useless.”

You can read more here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • Grammar Police 1st Dec '08 - 4:42pm

    Seems everyone’s at it.

  • Rock Hunter 1st Dec '08 - 4:59pm

    Come on Brown, your turn now!

  • Problem is – it’s true of all the parties.

    It’s true of Labour because most of the good MPs have been sacked for disagreeing with Blair/Brown, or disloyalty to NuLab, or for scandal; and the rest have “gone native”.

    It’s true of Conservative because most of the MPs are now second-rate never-had-a-real-job politico types like Cameron and Osborne (but not as good).

    It’s true of the Lib Dems because they dont have a wide enough pool to draw from (yet).

  • David Allen 1st Dec '08 - 5:46pm

    One of the reasons why it’s true of all the parties is because they’re trying to do a professional job with no proper training, standards, or performance evaluation. Cabinet is the last refuge of the gentleman (and woman) amateur!

  • Should we compile a list of the people who are not up to their jobs?

    My top three:
    Jacqui Smith, George Osborne, Ed Balls.

    Who can infiltrate that rogues gallery?

  • Shadows, shadows, everywhere 1st Dec '08 - 7:15pm

    @ Jennie, better Cameron mirroring Clegg than t’other way round!

  • Have you seen the House of Lords Tories who’d be expected to represent any Cameron Government ? I’d try to get on the first shuttle to Mars !!

  • Mark Williams 1st Dec '08 - 9:12pm

    How many politicians would be of the same calibre as the editor of a national newspaper, a senior partner in an international law or accountancy firm, an executive board member of a FTSE company or a senior civil servant?

    Very few match up to those benchmarks. Most would rank alongside a Deputy Reginal Director of Human Resources for a chain of High Street Chemists.

    Unlike “proper careers” advancement is often on the basis of good fortune rather than ability, which means that competent people are dissuaded from adopting it as a career and poor performaers can often advance beyond their abilities.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    To me empowerment of ordinary people embodies what we stand for and how we differ from the other Parties. This in turn reflects our respect for people knowing w...
  • Peter Davies
    I totally agree with David. This is another of those "Something must be done" policies. If you want to help the poor pay their bills then give them more money ...
  • Peter Chambers
    An interesting looking diagram. Different from the Political Compass. But a similar lower-left quadrant. My first thought was that Reform and the Conservatives...
  • Peter Hirst
    The return debate reveals a number of defects in our political landscape that are hindering our early rejoining. Our electoral system is possibly the most impor...
  • David Evans
    This strikes me as a proposal for a very complex system that needs to be thoroughly thought out before it gets anywhere near becoming party policy. As a party ...