CentreForum’s proposals for the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement

Ahead of December 5th’s Autumn Statement, we have suggested £17 billion of revenue-raising measures for the coalition parties to consider. Our proposals offer ways to narrow the deficit with as little pain as possible, and further measures to unlock growth.

These include what might be called “wealth taxes” – those on property, inheritance, and financial assets. One of our key themes is that substantial revenue can be raised simply by ending wealth and income tax breaks. Spending cuts should therefore include cuts to ‘tax expenditures’. Many of the measures below would make the tax system simpler, fairer and more efficient at the same time as raising revenue.

We suggest that regressive tax breaks for pensioners should be limited to those who need them. There are large inequalities in pension wealth, and while tax breaks promoting pension saving perform a useful function in society, there are limits to this utility. The £1.5m pension pot limit for tax breaks remains – at ten times the average retirement pot – excessive. We also propose making universal pensioner benefits taxable; a change compatible with the coalition agreement and Conservative manifesto.

Our recommendations include reforms for capital gains and inherited wealth. The coalition agreement commits the government to “seek ways of taxing non-business capital gains at rates similar or close to those applied to income” and more must be done. Why, for example, do we have an additional (45p) rate of income tax but no equivalent for CGT?

This government has made frustratingly little progress on property taxation. Instead of radical reform of council tax, business rates and stamp duty, we have seen central control, real tax cuts for those in the most expensive properties, and reductions in council tax benefit. If there is no chance of reform – even a mansion tax or independent review! – limited changes would include adding new council tax bands, and ending the freeze for those in the top bands.

One area where small welfare savings could easily and fairly be made is Statutory Maternity Pay. For the first 6 weeks after birth, the government covers 90% of a mother’s normal wages. This is completely uncapped, but should now be limited to the equivalent of £41,450 per year – the level at which higher rate tax begins.

There are also opportunities to reduce CO2 emissions, improve health and save drivers money at the same time as closing the deficit. As hinted at in Ed Davey’s conference speech, vehicle excise duty must be reformed. Amidst the debate on fuel duty, we should also look at the much lower rates paid on ‘red diesel’, a £2.4bn fuel subsidy for agricultural and other vehicles.

We must tear down unnecessary red tape and wrong-headed obstacles to growth. Higher education is one of the UK’s most successful ‘exports’ and the student immigration system must recognise this. Alongside this, we call again for a postgraduate loan system for UK students. We also hope the coalition will remove the barriers to meeting the Lib Dem goal of 300,000 new homes per year. Councils and residents must be given strong incentives to support developments, while the government should underwrite low-cost borrowing for housing associations.

Reducing the deficit without hammering the poor; reforming our complex and unfair tax system; and boosting growth. These are problems that are not going to be solved overnight, but December 5th would be a good place to start.

* Adam Corlett is a researcher at CentreForum and co-author of the think-tank’s submission to the Autumn Statement. Click here to view the full report.

* Adam Corlett is economist analyst at the Resolution Foundation, and writes here in a personal capacity as a party member.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31618 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • Are people who oppose an extra council tax band or two aware of the ludicrous ratio of cost band to house price value in some of the wealthiest areas in this country?
    As the measure hasn’t been reviewed since its hasty introduction over twenty years ago there are now anomalies which can only be called indefensible, even by free market libertarians like Daniel Hannan. Surely the owners of an average priced home in Mayfair, valued at around £2 million (according to current data), can afford an increase to the top band H which currently stands at £1,369.04.

  • Geoffrey Payne – Yes, I thought that was their attitude,too. My comment was published on Conservative Home (first time ever I’ve posted the same message on both sites) and it received more support there than on here within minutes.
    jedibeeftrix’s comment was flippant enough, but it does beg a question which reveals that residents in Curzon Steet W1, for instance, do get many more bin collections than most of us (obvious reasons being an additional mix of mansion flats and suites of offices, where there are also service charges.)
    Contrast that with living in, for instance, Sarah Teather’s constituency of Brent where Band H, a uniform band for all properties worth £320,000+, will cost the owner £2,731.32 p.a. – double the council tax paid in Westminster.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 20th Oct - 3:42am
    Prostitution is legal in England. It is illegal in Thailand.
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 20th Oct - 3:13am
    Dear Paul, I feel strongly that George Osborne is a con man. He's not an economic liberal or a conservative.
  • User AvatarPaul Fox 20th Oct - 12:02am
    The decision is consistent with the LD narrative that Labour crashed the economy and the Coalition was a partnership of principle to rescue the UK...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 19th Oct - 11:59pm
    @Tony Miller "It isn’t a matter of proportional responsibility for action on individual items, but how one partner can persuade the other to do (or...
  • User AvatarEd Shepherd 19th Oct - 11:16pm
    @ Simon Shaw. The article you refer to supports the view that I put forward. Financial support from firms andfor those training to be corporate...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 19th Oct - 10:59pm
    I think Stephen Hesketh is right about the principle of press regulation. Others will disagree, but the press often give the same prominence to inaccurate...