Chris Rennard steps aside from party roles to avoid “embarrassment” to Lib Dems

Further to the allegations broadcast on last night’s Channel 4 News that former Lib Dem chief executive Lord (Chris) Rennard behaved sexually inappropriately towards women working for the Liberal Democrats, he has announced he’s stepping aside from his current active roles within the party — as a Lib Dem peer and a member of the party’s federal policy committee — to avoid “embarrassment” to the party. Here‘s the Telegraph report:

The top Lib Dem official official will temporarily stand down from his party duties to avoid “embarrassment” to the party, after several women made accusations about his conduct on Channel Four News. The peer resigned from his role as chief executive in 2009 but was still actively involved in the Liberal Democrats. He will now withdraw from the party’s group in the House of Lords, which means he will not be able to vote with his party on any issues. He will also leave from the party’s federal policy committee, which is responsible for coming up with ideas for the Liberal Democrat manifesto.

In view of ongoing investigations and for legal reasons comments on this post will be disabled.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIgor Sagdejev 20th Oct - 11:28am
    Richard, could you name those countries that give work permits *automatically*? I want to go there! wherever I have worked before (first and foremost, the...
  • User AvatarSimon Banks 20th Oct - 11:26am
    As a Cambridge graduate, I wonder if what Miriam encountered was not the brash confidence of an elite, but people who'd been encouraged through the...
  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 20th Oct - 11:21am
    @Robin Lynn "Did Clegg not work for Brittan at the EU?" Yes, and that indicates to me that NC has been a Tory all along.
  • User AvatarRankersbo 20th Oct - 11:17am
    "Confusion" is just a polite description, not a misunderstanding.
  • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 20th Oct - 11:10am
    Agree with most of the points - not clear why LDs should NOT support Constitutional Monarchy and support Republicanism instead. Imagine having a Tory President...
  • User Avatarg 20th Oct - 11:09am
    Regardless of what you think of privileged, wealthy and conservative women telling girls in state schools they too can succeed without the benefit of privilege,...