Chris Rennard steps aside from party roles to avoid “embarrassment” to Lib Dems

Further to the allegations broadcast on last night’s Channel 4 News that former Lib Dem chief executive Lord (Chris) Rennard behaved sexually inappropriately towards women working for the Liberal Democrats, he has announced he’s stepping aside from his current active roles within the party — as a Lib Dem peer and a member of the party’s federal policy committee — to avoid “embarrassment” to the party. Here‘s the Telegraph report:

The top Lib Dem official official will temporarily stand down from his party duties to avoid “embarrassment” to the party, after several women made accusations about his conduct on Channel Four News. The peer resigned from his role as chief executive in 2009 but was still actively involved in the Liberal Democrats. He will now withdraw from the party’s group in the House of Lords, which means he will not be able to vote with his party on any issues. He will also leave from the party’s federal policy committee, which is responsible for coming up with ideas for the Liberal Democrat manifesto.

In view of ongoing investigations and for legal reasons comments on this post will be disabled.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarNick Baird 24th May - 6:13am
    As I've said before, you wouldn't do it this way if you were starting from scratch now. But I've seen the alternative of an all...
  • User AvatarManfarang 24th May - 3:01am
    David Allen I am a working person. I will be off to work in the next hour. Actually Ukip is financed by millionaires as it...
  • User AvatarRoland 24th May - 12:51am
    Dav 23rd May '16 - 12:47pm So why is making popular programmes a problem? Because if a programme is popular, then why does it need...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 24th May - 12:47am
    "If Labour really are genuine about electoral reform".... I think Blair genuinely intended to do it if he needed to do it. But he didn't...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 23rd May - 11:55pm
    On top of which the extra cost of advertising goods mentioned is just as much a compulsory levy on the rest of us as any...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 23rd May - 11:48pm
    Doesn't Mr Snelson realise he's paying twice for Sky (once for the sub plus higher prices on the goods advertised on it) ? On top...