Clegg on torture allegations: this goes “to the very top of Government”

As The Guardian reports:

The political storm over allegations of MI5 complicity in torture escalated tonight after Alan Johnson, the home secretary, accused the media of publishing “groundless accusations” and commentators of spreading “ludicrous lies” about the Security Service.

As defence lawyers prepared to challenge the government’s success in suppressing severe criticism of MI5 officers made by one of Britain’s most senior judges, the Liberal Democrat leader, Nick Clegg, pointed the finger at the “very top of government” saying senior ministers had probably known about claims of Britain’s involvement in torture but failed to take action to stop it.

Here’s Nick’s statement in full:

David Miliband and Alan Johnson’s letter on torture raises far more questions than it answers.

“We must know who in Britain knew the US had changed the rules on torture, when they knew and what action they took. We can only conclude that the security services either kept the information to themselves, or they informed ministers who failed to act immediately. Both of these would suggest at best a cover-up and at worst collusion in torture.

“Knowledge of Britain’s potential complicity in torture looks likely to have gone to the very top of Government. Miliband and Johnson may be trying to distance themselves, but there are serious questions to answer for those who were in charge at the time America changed the rules.”

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChris 24th Feb - 5:22pm
    Martin - my comment arises from frustration regarding the focus placed on the apparent potential of returning from irrelevance via anti-Brexit campaigning. I fundamentally disagree...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 5:08pm
    There are as many different proposals for Basic Income as proposers, but I will concentrate on three and just consider payments to a single working-age...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 5:07pm
    In the last paragraph of my review, I included a couple of caveats: " ...and while I am unconvinced that the taxation consequences of Basic...
  • User AvatarBilal 24th Feb - 4:57pm
    It was a disaster for the LibDems in Stoke. Turnout was very low and the Brexit vote was split 3 ways between Lab, Tory and...
  • User Avatarmatt 24th Feb - 4:51pm
    This really infuriates me https://www.gov.uk/government/news/changes-to-personal-independence-payment-regulations "people who cannot carry out a journey because of a visual or cognitive impairment are likely to need more support...
  • User AvatarGreg 24th Feb - 4:45pm
    Ask yourself this question: If the UK scraps its nuclear weapons, will nuclear war in the future be less likely or more likely? Will disarmament...