<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clegg&#8217;s first PMQs (UPDATED)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37910</guid>
		<description>I listened to it on the radio in the car.  I don&#039;t know if that made a difference, but Cameron was pretty poor and was lucky not to get told to sit down like the hapless Labour backbencher on one of his questions.

Clegg seemed solid - brevity is always better than waffle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to it on the radio in the car.  I don&#8217;t know if that made a difference, but Cameron was pretty poor and was lucky not to get told to sit down like the hapless Labour backbencher on one of his questions.</p>
<p>Clegg seemed solid &#8211; brevity is always better than waffle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37905</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37905</guid>
		<description>Watched the repeat of this and I agree Nick did really rather well - not fireworks, but professional. A good start.

What struck me though, was the ineptitude of Michael Martin. Ok so he can&#039;t force Brown to answer the question - and I&#039;m sure he wouldn&#039;t if he could - but when a PM is openly demanding that Cameron answers HIS OWN questions, that has to be beyong the pale.
If I had been DC, it would have been a perfect opportunity to offer Brown a job-swap (or that famous General Election) if he wants to be the one asking the questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watched the repeat of this and I agree Nick did really rather well &#8211; not fireworks, but professional. A good start.</p>
<p>What struck me though, was the ineptitude of Michael Martin. Ok so he can&#8217;t force Brown to answer the question &#8211; and I&#8217;m sure he wouldn&#8217;t if he could &#8211; but when a PM is openly demanding that Cameron answers HIS OWN questions, that has to be beyong the pale.<br />
If I had been DC, it would have been a perfect opportunity to offer Brown a job-swap (or that famous General Election) if he wants to be the one asking the questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37904</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37904</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;did it make the TV news?&lt;/i&gt;

I didn&#039;t see any TV news yesterday, but it seemed to get some pretty decent coverage in the press.  In fact the coverage was more extensive and more positive than I was expecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>did it make the TV news?</i></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see any TV news yesterday, but it seemed to get some pretty decent coverage in the press.  In fact the coverage was more extensive and more positive than I was expecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37894</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37894</guid>
		<description>Sal, I simply don&#039;t accept that Cameron is doing anything that either resonates with the public or, more importantly, gets him reported as doing so.  They always strike me as appallingly petulant.  His performances are good for the morale of the Conservative Party (who love that sort of thing) I grant you, but nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sal, I simply don&#8217;t accept that Cameron is doing anything that either resonates with the public or, more importantly, gets him reported as doing so.  They always strike me as appallingly petulant.  His performances are good for the morale of the Conservative Party (who love that sort of thing) I grant you, but nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37886</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37886</guid>
		<description>Lloyd
You make a good point. It didn&#039;t make the news that I saw and I saw three of them but the paper coverage seems OK.

As for Brown&#039;s lack of experience at PMQs - I don&#039;t think a man who has made a career at Treasury Questions of steam rollering over the careers of others can claim a lack of operational experience [or lay a claim to sympathy]. He also has a pet referee [Mr Speaker]. I hope Brown doesn&#039;t get away with asking Nick questions until he has had a few more sessions under his belt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd<br />
You make a good point. It didn&#8217;t make the news that I saw and I saw three of them but the paper coverage seems OK.</p>
<p>As for Brown&#8217;s lack of experience at PMQs &#8211; I don&#8217;t think a man who has made a career at Treasury Questions of steam rollering over the careers of others can claim a lack of operational experience [or lay a claim to sympathy]. He also has a pet referee [Mr Speaker]. I hope Brown doesn&#8217;t get away with asking Nick questions until he has had a few more sessions under his belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37882</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37882</guid>
		<description>did it make the TV news?
or were they only going to report it if it was a bad news story for the Lib Dems (hidden adgenda)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did it make the TV news?<br />
or were they only going to report it if it was a bad news story for the Lib Dems (hidden adgenda)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Theed</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37881</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Theed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37881</guid>
		<description>A small point, but Cameron has had more experience in asking questions at PMQs than Brown has had in answering them as PM.  Nick did well and the question was very relevant to many elderly viewers.  The scatter gun technique employed by Cameron today might please political pros but might not impress others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small point, but Cameron has had more experience in asking questions at PMQs than Brown has had in answering them as PM.  Nick did well and the question was very relevant to many elderly viewers.  The scatter gun technique employed by Cameron today might please political pros but might not impress others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37878</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37878</guid>
		<description>James
Vince was able to make an impact because people in the media had low expectations and were, for once, happy to be proved quite wrong. I also doubt [as Nick himself said] they would have been quite so willing to eat their words if he had been permanent.

&#039;Cameron is dull at PMQs &#039; If we were honest, we would be more than happy if our leader did as well. You seem happy already and he hasn&#039;t done aswell. It is not helpful to underestimate our opponents. Setting the bar low for our own and raising it for others is a pointless internal exercise.

I accept PMQs can be a bit of an irrelevance [in SOME, but not all circumstances]. Charles Kennedy wasn&#039;t bad but in any event he had other qualities in bucket fulls which compensated hugely but which were quite unusual.

&#039;He&#039;s outclassed Brown certainly, but that&#039;s old news ....&#039;
No it is not. It wouldn&#039;t be if he stopped outclassing him. He has used it to better the man with more experience. He has taken something out it to his advantage, like it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James<br />
Vince was able to make an impact because people in the media had low expectations and were, for once, happy to be proved quite wrong. I also doubt [as Nick himself said] they would have been quite so willing to eat their words if he had been permanent.</p>
<p>&#8216;Cameron is dull at PMQs &#8216; If we were honest, we would be more than happy if our leader did as well. You seem happy already and he hasn&#8217;t done aswell. It is not helpful to underestimate our opponents. Setting the bar low for our own and raising it for others is a pointless internal exercise.</p>
<p>I accept PMQs can be a bit of an irrelevance [in SOME, but not all circumstances]. Charles Kennedy wasn&#8217;t bad but in any event he had other qualities in bucket fulls which compensated hugely but which were quite unusual.</p>
<p>&#8216;He&#8217;s outclassed Brown certainly, but that&#8217;s old news &#8230;.&#8217;<br />
No it is not. It wouldn&#8217;t be if he stopped outclassing him. He has used it to better the man with more experience. He has taken something out it to his advantage, like it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37865</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37865</guid>
		<description>#24 Sal: actually, being unspectacular at PMQs won&#039;t make a blind bit of difference.  Kennedy was mediocre at them but it didn&#039;t matter because it wasn&#039;t part of his charm.

If Clegg manages to do as well as he did this week over the next few months I&#039;ll be quite content.  As it happens, he&#039;ll inevitably have opportunities to make more of an impact.

It should be noted that one of the reasons Cable was able to make such an impact is that actually Cameron is quite dull.  He&#039;s outclassed Brown certainly, but that&#039;s old news now and he never seems to do anything new.  As Alex W suggests above, he&#039;s also getting sloppy, taking loads of his slots to make fairly elementary points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 Sal: actually, being unspectacular at PMQs won&#8217;t make a blind bit of difference.  Kennedy was mediocre at them but it didn&#8217;t matter because it wasn&#8217;t part of his charm.</p>
<p>If Clegg manages to do as well as he did this week over the next few months I&#8217;ll be quite content.  As it happens, he&#8217;ll inevitably have opportunities to make more of an impact.</p>
<p>It should be noted that one of the reasons Cable was able to make such an impact is that actually Cameron is quite dull.  He&#8217;s outclassed Brown certainly, but that&#8217;s old news now and he never seems to do anything new.  As Alex W suggests above, he&#8217;s also getting sloppy, taking loads of his slots to make fairly elementary points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meral</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37862</link>
		<dc:creator>Meral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37862</guid>
		<description>Alix at 19- yeh agree: if I hear Cameron say &#039; okay lets try another question&#039; one more time...  I&#039;ve nothing against testosterone, but he and Brown are taking PMQ to new dizzying levels of the stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alix at 19- yeh agree: if I hear Cameron say &#8216; okay lets try another question&#8217; one more time&#8230;  I&#8217;ve nothing against testosterone, but he and Brown are taking PMQ to new dizzying levels of the stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37860</link>
		<dc:creator>Sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37860</guid>
		<description>Competent. No more. Not a patch on Cameron&#039;s first outing, but not a train wreck which had to be avoided at ALL costs [and it makes my heart pound just to watch it].
But I am not leader. Blandness will not do for ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Competent. No more. Not a patch on Cameron&#8217;s first outing, but not a train wreck which had to be avoided at ALL costs [and it makes my heart pound just to watch it].<br />
But I am not leader. Blandness will not do for ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37848</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37848</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised no-one has commented here that Lib Dem MPs are a bunch of flankers yet.

I&#039;ll get my coat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised no-one has commented here that Lib Dem MPs are a bunch of flankers yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get my coat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meral</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37847</link>
		<dc:creator>Meral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37847</guid>
		<description>I thought it was a good subject, well delivered- faultless.
It was also a good idea for Nick to sit flanked by other frontbenchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was a good subject, well delivered- faultless.<br />
It was also a good idea for Nick to sit flanked by other frontbenchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Wilcock</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37846</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Wilcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37846</guid>
		<description>A good performance from Nick, and he managed his main aim – that no-one would say he was ‘doing a Ming’ (despite most of Ming’s PMQs being so much better than his first). It wasn’t exciting, but it was to the point, and the Prime Minister couldn’t make up his mind whether to bluster or love-bomb in response, as he clearly couldn’t answer. Mr Cameron had good issues, too, but was less effective in roving over so many of them; despite getting three times as many questions as the Liberal Democrat Leader, the Tory Leader keeps trying to get in extra questions by launching a scatttergun of issues, and I’m never quite sure it works. He’s trying to reinforce the impression that the Labour Government is failing across the board, which is a powerful idea out there – but it also reinforces the idea out there that Mr Cameron can’t make up his mind, which is unwise for him.

I tend to stammer when I’m nervous, so I tend to notice other people’s little tics, and Mr Brown’s include repeating himself in ever-more strident bellows as well as the odd amusing Freudian slip (I remember one speech when he was trying very, very hard to talk about values, rather than being the man obsessed with every penny we have, but fluffed out “Noble purses worth – noble purposes worth fighting for…”). He managed both today with a pre-rehearsed line about Mr Cameron’s pre-rehearsed lines which he repeated three times, to heckles. Except that Mr Brown should have rehearsed his line a bit more carefully, as the first time it came out as “herhersed”. Typed, it looks like a written laugh, but out loud it seemed he was looking at Mr Cameron and thinking of hearses…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good performance from Nick, and he managed his main aim – that no-one would say he was ‘doing a Ming’ (despite most of Ming’s PMQs being so much better than his first). It wasn’t exciting, but it was to the point, and the Prime Minister couldn’t make up his mind whether to bluster or love-bomb in response, as he clearly couldn’t answer. Mr Cameron had good issues, too, but was less effective in roving over so many of them; despite getting three times as many questions as the Liberal Democrat Leader, the Tory Leader keeps trying to get in extra questions by launching a scatttergun of issues, and I’m never quite sure it works. He’s trying to reinforce the impression that the Labour Government is failing across the board, which is a powerful idea out there – but it also reinforces the idea out there that Mr Cameron can’t make up his mind, which is unwise for him.</p>
<p>I tend to stammer when I’m nervous, so I tend to notice other people’s little tics, and Mr Brown’s include repeating himself in ever-more strident bellows as well as the odd amusing Freudian slip (I remember one speech when he was trying very, very hard to talk about values, rather than being the man obsessed with every penny we have, but fluffed out “Noble purses worth – noble purposes worth fighting for…”). He managed both today with a pre-rehearsed line about Mr Cameron’s pre-rehearsed lines which he repeated three times, to heckles. Except that Mr Brown should have rehearsed his line a bit more carefully, as the first time it came out as “herhersed”. Typed, it looks like a written laugh, but out loud it seemed he was looking at Mr Cameron and thinking of hearses…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37842</link>
		<dc:creator>simon wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37842</guid>
		<description>Good solid start</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good solid start</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alix</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37840</link>
		<dc:creator>Alix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37840</guid>
		<description>Cavilling here, since that was an impressively solid showing I could wish he had thrown in an aside about the contrast between his questions and the Gordon and Dave Shouty Plonker Show - sort of a &quot;Come on, now, put your willies away&quot; would have come off very well I think. But these things must be almost impossibly difficult to judge on the spur of the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cavilling here, since that was an impressively solid showing I could wish he had thrown in an aside about the contrast between his questions and the Gordon and Dave Shouty Plonker Show &#8211; sort of a &#8220;Come on, now, put your willies away&#8221; would have come off very well I think. But these things must be almost impossibly difficult to judge on the spur of the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37839</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37839</guid>
		<description>Daily politics is saying that Clegg was the winner today. Good stuff for his first PMQs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily politics is saying that Clegg was the winner today. Good stuff for his first PMQs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Land</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37837</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37837</guid>
		<description>a good start</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a good start</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hennigan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37836</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hennigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37836</guid>
		<description>Louise Ellman - talking about the Capital of Culture Bid - despite the Labour Party in Liverpool undermining it relentlessly!!! and the Government refusing to pay towards increased policing costs.  Hypocrisy!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise Ellman &#8211; talking about the Capital of Culture Bid &#8211; despite the Labour Party in Liverpool undermining it relentlessly!!! and the Government refusing to pay towards increased policing costs.  Hypocrisy!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37835</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 12:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/cleggs-first-pmqs-1947.html#comment-37835</guid>
		<description>I like the fact that a follow-up was seemingly coordinated with Steve Webb.  It makes it more likely that the press pick up and run with our issue, and give us attention, than if Webb had asked about something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fact that a follow-up was seemingly coordinated with Steve Webb.  It makes it more likely that the press pick up and run with our issue, and give us attention, than if Webb had asked about something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

