Co-operative Party set to benefit as joint candidates allowed to use logos

The Co-operative Party, which runs joint candidates with the Labour Party, reports:

Following last year’s ruling by the Electoral Commission that precluded joint candidates from using an emblem – which was made without warning and after the nominations deadline – we have spent a long year of negotiation with the EC and the Cabinet Office to secure the necessary change to legislation.

A statutory instruments laid before Parliament last week updates election rules to tackle this. The Local Elections (Principal Areas) (England and Wales) (Amendment) Rules 2011 adds the following to the rules:

If a candidate who is the subject of an authorisation by two or more parties under rule 5(3) so requests, the ballot paper must contain, against the candidate’s particulars, the registered emblem (or, as the case may be, one of the registered emblems) of one of those parties.

The rules for parish and community council elections in England and Wales have also been updated.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

5 Comments

  • So that sorts out England & Wales, what about the rest?

  • EdinburghVoter 7th Mar '11 - 12:36pm

    Cannot speak for elsewhere, but this problem does not affect Scottish Parliament candidates as the “problem” legislation does not apply to SP elections.

    It did cause problems for joint candidates in Scotland at the 2010 general election. I would guess that will be fixed before the next UK general election.

  • toryboysnevergrowup 7th Mar '11 - 1:20pm

    Good to see that the Electoral Commission had nothing better to do with its time in the run up to the last General Election. I wonder which pedant thought it was worth complaining to them about this in the first place??

  • Martin Tiedemann 18th Mar '11 - 10:45am

    Other statutory instruments have been laid which cover the Scottish Parliament, Welsh & Northern Irish Assemblies and directly elected Mayors in England. Correcting this mistake for general elections requires primary legislation which should be in hand.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGraham Evans 27th Apr - 3:42pm
    The problem with all forms of taxation which are not linked to specific types of expenditure is that every interest group will claim that their...
  • User AvatarThomas 27th Apr - 3:03pm
    Why not this one? http://www.libdemvoice.org/property-uplift-recovery-tax-54023.html Inheritance tax must be heavily skewed towards the rich, especially those with inherited wealth Duke of Westminster, or it would...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 27th Apr - 2:59pm
    'Ode to Joy the anthem of Europe!' I have it as my ringtone on my mobile.
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 27th Apr - 2:47pm
    The problem with the reformed state pension is that it is still far to low for anyone to reasonably live off. Even more so if...
  • User AvatarJudy Abel 27th Apr - 2:32pm
    A warning from the Guardian today on the Lib Dems having too much of a focus on Remain voters: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/27/lib-dems-shouldnt-count-on-remain-votes-the-data-looks-bleak
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 27th Apr - 2:31pm
    If we understand how money works we have a better appreciation of why taxes are levied. From the POV of the currency issuer, spending has...