Complaint upheld against SNP MSP caught using public funds to promote SNP candidates

Just a quick update on a story I brought to you last month about SNP MSP Rob Gibson. He used adverts, funded by the Scottish Parliament, for his surgeries which included some heavy duty promotion of his staff who at the time were standing as candidates for Highland Council. Both were subsequently elected.

 

At the time, Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott complained to the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body. The minutes of their most recent meeting have been published and show that:

The SPCB agreed to uphold complaints received about adverts placed by Rob Gibson MSP on the grounds that the adverts breached the guidance on the use of parliamentary resources. The SPCB also agreed to consider the wider issue of surgery advertising at a future meeting.

A spokesman for Tavish Scott and the Scottish Liberal Democrats said in response to this:

This was a clear breach of Scottish Parliament rules. Mr Gibson must have known that he could not promote SNP candidates using taxpayers’ money but chose to give it a go and hope that no one would notice.

People did notice and the Scottish Parliament has rightly ruled against him. It will be interesting to see how the SNP candidates in question account for the cost of these ‘adverts’ on their election expenses.

I’m sure a close eye will also be kept on the election expenses of every SNP candidate in Central Scotland after this advertisement appeared in the Metro the day before the Council election.

As there are no national campaign expenses during a local election, the cost is surely attributable equally among all candidates in the circulation area.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28761 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 29th Jan - 3:29am
    The other reason I say the way you frame the choice is too stark is hopefully easier for me to explain! It boils down to...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 29th Jan - 2:22am
    Matthew - I agree that tax and spending proposals and decisions are often seen - wrongly - as isolated, separate things rather than intrinsically linked....
  • User AvatarStephen Johnson 29th Jan - 12:27am
    Lib Dems should not give up on electoral reform for Westminster. The result of the coming election is likely to shout injustice, with the Lib...
  • User Avatarrefitman 29th Jan - 12:23am
    You've defended the badger cull, contributed to flooding by removing defences and imposed a 3 line whip on the fracking vote. I think any green...
  • User AvatarStephen Johnson 29th Jan - 12:14am
    The proposal is for a step towards PR with a system that will not scare the horses used to FPTP. Unfortunately it involves redrawing the...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 29th Jan - 12:09am
    paul barker writes: > Right now more than a third of voters say they want Parties other than The Big Two, > I dont see...