Complaint upheld against SNP MSP caught using public funds to promote SNP candidates

Just a quick update on a story I brought to you last month about SNP MSP Rob Gibson. He used adverts, funded by the Scottish Parliament, for his surgeries which included some heavy duty promotion of his staff who at the time were standing as candidates for Highland Council. Both were subsequently elected.


At the time, Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott complained to the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body. The minutes of their most recent meeting have been published and show that:

The SPCB agreed to uphold complaints received about adverts placed by Rob Gibson MSP on the grounds that the adverts breached the guidance on the use of parliamentary resources. The SPCB also agreed to consider the wider issue of surgery advertising at a future meeting.

A spokesman for Tavish Scott and the Scottish Liberal Democrats said in response to this:

This was a clear breach of Scottish Parliament rules. Mr Gibson must have known that he could not promote SNP candidates using taxpayers’ money but chose to give it a go and hope that no one would notice.

People did notice and the Scottish Parliament has rightly ruled against him. It will be interesting to see how the SNP candidates in question account for the cost of these ‘adverts’ on their election expenses.

I’m sure a close eye will also be kept on the election expenses of every SNP candidate in Central Scotland after this advertisement appeared in the Metro the day before the Council election.

As there are no national campaign expenses during a local election, the cost is surely attributable equally among all candidates in the circulation area.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJonathan Brown 30th Nov - 6:33pm
    @Expats - I'm well aware that the link included a caveat. I think anyone sensible venturing an opinion should do so with a multitude of...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 30th Nov - 6:24pm
    @ Thomas S - it might have come sooner for the parliamentary party, but it would have been a lesser disaster and by now we...
  • User Avatarexpats 30th Nov - 6:07pm
    Jonathan Brown......The link you post comes with the caveat......" Consequently, what follows should be seen as little more than informed speculation based on limited and...
  • User AvatarPeter Hellyer 30th Nov - 6:05pm
    @Jonathan, Yes - if we & allies extend our bombing of ISIS into Syria while Assad and Putin bomb other opposition elements (including other jihadis,...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 30th Nov - 5:57pm
    It's painfully ironic to hear Syrian community reps saying that ISIS should not be attacked because the west turned a blind eye to Assad's butchery...
  • User Avatarindigo 30th Nov - 5:48pm
    ISIS - What is the real threat? The real threat occurred when ISIS spun out of Western control. Let's have a frank conversation here. The...