Complaint upheld against SNP MSP caught using public funds to promote SNP candidates

Just a quick update on a story I brought to you last month about SNP MSP Rob Gibson. He used adverts, funded by the Scottish Parliament, for his surgeries which included some heavy duty promotion of his staff who at the time were standing as candidates for Highland Council. Both were subsequently elected.

 

At the time, Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott complained to the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body. The minutes of their most recent meeting have been published and show that:

The SPCB agreed to uphold complaints received about adverts placed by Rob Gibson MSP on the grounds that the adverts breached the guidance on the use of parliamentary resources. The SPCB also agreed to consider the wider issue of surgery advertising at a future meeting.

A spokesman for Tavish Scott and the Scottish Liberal Democrats said in response to this:

This was a clear breach of Scottish Parliament rules. Mr Gibson must have known that he could not promote SNP candidates using taxpayers’ money but chose to give it a go and hope that no one would notice.

People did notice and the Scottish Parliament has rightly ruled against him. It will be interesting to see how the SNP candidates in question account for the cost of these ‘adverts’ on their election expenses.

I’m sure a close eye will also be kept on the election expenses of every SNP candidate in Central Scotland after this advertisement appeared in the Metro the day before the Council election.

As there are no national campaign expenses during a local election, the cost is surely attributable equally among all candidates in the circulation area.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 27th May - 2:58am
    A very intelligent article, interesting none of the contributors from the pro Corbyn , not , Liberal Democrat , voting Labour , brigade, are nowhere...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 27th May - 2:00am
    I think it was the invasion of Iraq which increased anti-UK, anti-USA and anti-Western feelings amongst Muslims plus the failure to bring peace to Iraq...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 27th May - 12:53am
    I hadn’t realised that the current act protected £118,000 of assets but I knew it set a limit on care costs of £72,000. The system...
  • User AvatarGary 27th May - 12:29am
    Tynan here in a village in Milton Keynes North the tally is: Lab: 0 Con: 0 LibDem: 0 It is really capturing the imagination...
  • User AvatarNom de Plume 27th May - 12:14am
    Peter, "Brexit was last year’s argument for most people." - Any evidence? Brexit has just begun. "they’ve caught the public mood" - Define your terms....
  • User AvatarTynan 27th May - 12:12am
    Half way through, middle of York campaign leaflets received to date-: Labour - 3 Conservatives -1 LibDems - 0