Complaint upheld against SNP MSP caught using public funds to promote SNP candidates

Just a quick update on a story I brought to you last month about SNP MSP Rob Gibson. He used adverts, funded by the Scottish Parliament, for his surgeries which included some heavy duty promotion of his staff who at the time were standing as candidates for Highland Council. Both were subsequently elected.

 

At the time, Liberal Democrat MSP Tavish Scott complained to the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body. The minutes of their most recent meeting have been published and show that:

The SPCB agreed to uphold complaints received about adverts placed by Rob Gibson MSP on the grounds that the adverts breached the guidance on the use of parliamentary resources. The SPCB also agreed to consider the wider issue of surgery advertising at a future meeting.

A spokesman for Tavish Scott and the Scottish Liberal Democrats said in response to this:

This was a clear breach of Scottish Parliament rules. Mr Gibson must have known that he could not promote SNP candidates using taxpayers’ money but chose to give it a go and hope that no one would notice.

People did notice and the Scottish Parliament has rightly ruled against him. It will be interesting to see how the SNP candidates in question account for the cost of these ‘adverts’ on their election expenses.

I’m sure a close eye will also be kept on the election expenses of every SNP candidate in Central Scotland after this advertisement appeared in the Metro the day before the Council election.

As there are no national campaign expenses during a local election, the cost is surely attributable equally among all candidates in the circulation area.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28761 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMick Taylor 5th Aug - 9:00am
    @David Raw. TTIP does not include the provision that would allow US business to demand entry into public services, because the EU negotiators have refused...
  • User AvatarRichard Stallard 5th Aug - 8:57am
    All I hope is that a few of good people in the Lib Dems (of which there are many!) will read this thread and perhaps...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 5th Aug - 8:39am
    I have blogged on another thread about "snakeheads", travel agents for illegal migration. The phrase genuine "asylum seekers" does not make sense in law, although...
  • User AvatarZack Polanski 5th Aug - 8:31am
    Jeremy has seemed lukewarm at best on Electoral Reform. He gave the old red herring line about it being important that the constituency link is...
  • User AvatarJohn Innes 5th Aug - 8:31am
    @Steve Comer - Yes I hope he has/will speak to the truck drivers, yet I am proud of Tim for taking this initiative.
  • User AvatarRichard Stallard 5th Aug - 8:22am
    "Solicitors would say that they had honestly copied them, which would be true..." Not always, in my experience! Let's not forget, we're dealing with highly...