Conservative bloggers don’t like their party’s support for Jack Straw’s Iraq veto

Iain Dale: So the Tories are backing the government’s plans for the Post Office and Jack Straw’s decision to block publication of the Iraq war cabinet minutes. It’s probably just as well I have been too busy today to do much blogging.

Dizzy Thinks: I thought I would just pass a quick comment on Jack Straw’s decision to veto the Information Commissioner on the issue of Cabinet minutes on the decision to go to war in Iraq. Firstly, the Tories are bloody idiots to support the Government on this…

Share:
This entry was posted in Opposition watch and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/11756 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

2 Comments

  • Posted 25th February 2009 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    David Howarth isn’t arguing that Cabinet minutes should always be published, is he?

    So LibDem opposition to Jack Straw’s Iraq veto must be based on the specifics of this case.

    David Howarth says “The decision to go to war in Iraq was momentous, controversial and disastrous, especially for this country’s reputation as an upholder of international law.”

    But why should these Cabinet minutes be an exception to the confidentiality of Cabinet discussions?

  • Hywel
    Posted 25th February 2009 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Not a point wholly without merit. It really needs a reading of the Information Commissioner’s decision that there were public interest grounds to publish them.

    It is indicative of something that Jack Straw chose not to challenge whether the Information Commissioner/Tribunal had made a correct decision in law but to use his veto powers

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?