Conservative economic policy trivia corner

One of the two men George Osborne says are his key advisers on the economic framework he wants to put in place is Alan Budd. He was chief economic adviser at the Treasury when Britain was in deep recession in the early 1990s, including before and during Black Wednesday, when sterling crashed out of the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM), destroying the Government’s then economic policy and costing over £3 billion.

Let’s hope he’s learnt a thing or two :-)

Share:
This entry was posted in News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/5336 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

4 Comments

  • Posted 2nd November 2008 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    Budd was an arch-monetarist, which is ominous. Who is the other adviser?

  • Posted 2nd November 2008 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Will that be the ERM that all the major parties supported at the time?

  • Posted 2nd November 2008 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Budd was against it, was he not?

  • Tim Leunig
    Posted 4th November 2008 at 12:22 am | Permalink

    Alan is a serious economist, the sort of person our party would be delighted to parade around! The post-ERM period was also the time in which Britain became serious about inflation targetting, and for we know Budd may well have proposed making the Bank of E independent in this era – we know that the Tories didn’t like the idea, but HMT certainly seemed to have some plans on how to do it as soon as Labour got in.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?