Mark Pack

Conservative peer named and shamed over non-payment of tax

By | Thu 7th June 2007 - 2:12 pm

As the BBC says:

A leading Tory donor has been publicly rebuked by the Lords appointments commission for taking his seat without giving up his status as a tax exile … The commission said it had informed the prime minister of Lord Laidlaw’s situation and said it would not have approved his peerage if it had known that he would not honour his promise.

In other words – he promised to pay tax if he got his peerage, he’s got his peerage and, er… he’s not paying the tax he promised.

And here’s a fun twist for those who have been following the attempts of Conservative and Labour MPs to exempt Parliament from the Freedom of Information Act  – it’s under that very act that the rest of us get to read the following letter written to Lord Laidlaw by the Chairman of the Appointments Commission:

You made a very precise commitment to the commission in a situation where you knew a condition of being appointed to the Lords was to be UK tax resident. You have so far failed to honour this unqualified commitment.

And the reason Lord Laidlaw hasn’t had the Conservative whip withdrawn for breaking his promise and failing to pay the tax is …?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    Entering a race implies usually a commitment to win it. The idea should be not to win a hyporthetical AI race but to find the best compromise between using it w...
  • Peter Hirst
    You might get more volunteers if it was clearer that they have influence over who is approved and selected for Westminster seats compared with the Westminster o...
  • Peter Hirst
    You don't mention our so called independent nuclear deterrent. There is no reason why we can't merge it with France's. Why on earth do you need two nuclear dete...
  • David Evans
    The one thing that this article shows is that it is impossible to establish a strategy that makes us clearly different from the other parties if we stick to our...
  • Peter Hirst
    To underpin and solidify a federal devolved structure there must also be the accompanying infrastructure. To prepare for this larger regional governance our edu...