Conservatives rope in Squier, Knapp, Dunn Communications

Iain Martin’s general election commentary for the Wall Street Journal is rapidly become a must-read for me due to his record of unearthing useful bits of extra information that shed an extra light on the big political stories.

This week he had a good piece on the Conservative Party’s preparation for televised party leader debates during the general election:

Advisers close to U.S. President Barack Obama have been drafted by David Cameron to help the Conservatives in their election campaign against Gordon Brown and Labour.

The Tories have signed a contract with Squier, Knapp, Dunn Communications—a Washington-based Democrat-leaning political consultancy— to help them prepare for the first-ever television debates between leaders during a British election campaign.

That firm’s name is familiar to me as I know someone who has worked with them in American politics, so I asked them what they made of this appointment.

Their response:

Certainly explains where a large chunk of the Tories cash will be going. SKD are one of the most expensive firms out there.

That certainly fits with the pattern of a party that employs a head of communications (Andy Coulson) on a higher salary than the Prime Minister.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18112 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarChrisB 31st Oct - 2:46pm
    It's one of those rare moments that I agree with Huppert. >We need a “carrot and stick” approach to hard drugs. Yeah, it'd be great...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:39pm
    @ Matthew "But that is the opposite of the original argument. There is no special “London tax” proposed. The idea is that wealthier people get...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 31st Oct - 2:36pm
    @matthew - how does the success of financial services in London cause industry to be closed down elsewhere?
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Oct - 2:31pm
    Yes Norman Lamb is probably right to criticise those halloween outfits. Although, people can take offence at everything. However, the statement "What’s scarier than the...
  • User Avatarbenj 31st Oct - 2:20pm
    @ Dav It is a black hole if it pays less in tax revenues than it's rental value of land . Unlike the value of...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Oct - 2:18pm
    Dav London generates the wealth which keeps the UK running. Yes, and to what extent has that involved sucking up all the people with the...