Control orders, tax exiles and extraordinary rendition: political vocabulary as messaging

“Control orders” could be called “secret detention directives”. “Tax exiles” could be called “tax fugitives”. “Extraordinary rendition” could be called “government-sponsored kidnapping”.

In all three cases a fairly benign phrase has been adopted by both sides of the debate, despite the phrase very much favouring one. Having a bit of order doesn’t instinctively sound too bad. Exile even has a whiff of the honourably martyr about it. And “extraordinary”? Well, that’s usually a good thing, isn’t it? Especially if we’re talking about “rendition”, i.e. a word that is well outside common usage.

Does it matter? Not if an issue is at the centre of public attention. But when an issue only gets brief interest from the public, or minimal media coverage that gets little beyond naming the issue and quoting two different politicians disagreeing, then yes it does – as it frames the way in which people judge the issue.

That, of course, is one of the reasons why the Yes campaign for the forthcoming referendum on the alternative vote is Yes To Fairer Votes rather than Yes To An Acronym You’ve Not Heard Of.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/22702 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • So, Stephen, are you seriously suggesting that FPTP is faier than AV?

    Many here will of course say that there are many fairer systems than AV, especially PR in its various guises. However, FPTP is surely so horrendously unfair that pretty much anything is better, and AV most certainly is.

    I’d also say that on a constiutuency level, AV has the potential to making a real difference, as candidates need to reach out to a much larger proportion of voters.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarColin Rosenstiel 22nd Nov - 1:25am
    The full results are now at www.rosenstiel.co.uk/ldelections. In answer to Jonathan Brown: 1 in 5 is one third (rounded down). Laura Gordon: the figures are...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 22nd Nov - 1:22am
    Stevan Rose ' This is why no-one is really qualified to judge what is fair and it is nonsense to try and work out a...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 22nd Nov - 12:47am
    Stuart ' Not the best introduction to the subject.' So I'm sure from your studies you now realise that those 9/11 terrorists followed an ideology...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 22nd Nov - 12:39am
    "That pretty much skewers half of the party’s “Stronger Economy Fairer Society” line." It's a meaningless strap line that looks good on a podium backdrop....
  • User AvatarPeter Chegwyn 22nd Nov - 12:27am
    It's now past midnight. Still no sign of the Dear Leader. Our worst by-election ever and he still has nothing to say. Like many others...
  • User AvatarSarah Noble 22nd Nov - 12:26am
    @Paul from Wokingham: Sally and John Bercow seemed fine to vote for different parties! What we're seeing is a complete failure of the left and...