Control orders, tax exiles and extraordinary rendition: political vocabulary as messaging

“Control orders” could be called “secret detention directives”. “Tax exiles” could be called “tax fugitives”. “Extraordinary rendition” could be called “government-sponsored kidnapping”.

In all three cases a fairly benign phrase has been adopted by both sides of the debate, despite the phrase very much favouring one. Having a bit of order doesn’t instinctively sound too bad. Exile even has a whiff of the honourably martyr about it. And “extraordinary”? Well, that’s usually a good thing, isn’t it? Especially if we’re talking about “rendition”, i.e. a word that is well outside common usage.

Does it matter? Not if an issue is at the centre of public attention. But when an issue only gets brief interest from the public, or minimal media coverage that gets little beyond naming the issue and quoting two different politicians disagreeing, then yes it does – as it frames the way in which people judge the issue.

That, of course, is one of the reasons why the Yes campaign for the forthcoming referendum on the alternative vote is Yes To Fairer Votes rather than Yes To An Acronym You’ve Not Heard Of.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/22702 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • So, Stephen, are you seriously suggesting that FPTP is faier than AV?

    Many here will of course say that there are many fairer systems than AV, especially PR in its various guises. However, FPTP is surely so horrendously unfair that pretty much anything is better, and AV most certainly is.

    I’d also say that on a constiutuency level, AV has the potential to making a real difference, as candidates need to reach out to a much larger proportion of voters.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Otten 19th Dec - 10:18pm
    g, the public health angle here is the reduction in smoking. Reduction in nicotine use is relatively insignificant by comparison. Stuart, vaping has been banned...
  • User AvatarJack 19th Dec - 10:08pm
    I don't really see the benefit over a sensible system of tapered benefits. What's the big win here? Against that you set the inability of...
  • User AvatarIan Wallace 19th Dec - 10:02pm
    History suggests that we should never believe that the Tory's will be happy to consider constitutional change but will only change when it becomes a...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 19th Dec - 9:39pm
    In a world without a society, we must all work to survive. We must all, individually, till the ground and hunt the rabbit. Working to...
  • User AvatarSesenco 19th Dec - 9:11pm
    Malc wrote, "So it’s not a case of whether young people are mature enough," (1) Would you be kind enough to supply us with a...
  • User AvatarHywel 19th Dec - 9:08pm
    John - in my view the MPs have both gone native and lost any sort of spine. See the Judicial review votes and reports of...
Sat 20th Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015