Control orders, tax exiles and extraordinary rendition: political vocabulary as messaging

“Control orders” could be called “secret detention directives”. “Tax exiles” could be called “tax fugitives”. “Extraordinary rendition” could be called “government-sponsored kidnapping”.

In all three cases a fairly benign phrase has been adopted by both sides of the debate, despite the phrase very much favouring one. Having a bit of order doesn’t instinctively sound too bad. Exile even has a whiff of the honourably martyr about it. And “extraordinary”? Well, that’s usually a good thing, isn’t it? Especially if we’re talking about “rendition”, i.e. a word that is well outside common usage.

Does it matter? Not if an issue is at the centre of public attention. But when an issue only gets brief interest from the public, or minimal media coverage that gets little beyond naming the issue and quoting two different politicians disagreeing, then yes it does – as it frames the way in which people judge the issue.

That, of course, is one of the reasons why the Yes campaign for the forthcoming referendum on the alternative vote is Yes To Fairer Votes rather than Yes To An Acronym You’ve Not Heard Of.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • So, Stephen, are you seriously suggesting that FPTP is faier than AV?

    Many here will of course say that there are many fairer systems than AV, especially PR in its various guises. However, FPTP is surely so horrendously unfair that pretty much anything is better, and AV most certainly is.

    I’d also say that on a constiutuency level, AV has the potential to making a real difference, as candidates need to reach out to a much larger proportion of voters.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 3rd May - 10:35am
    Eddie Sammon 2nd May '15 - 5:44pm "John Roffey, no, I also wouldn’t divide England completely due to the single market, but I don’t want...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 3rd May - 10:11am
    The party NC has supported since his student days - has always been blue. Is he also an avid supporter of a Midlands football club...
  • User AvatarSara Scarlett 3rd May - 10:09am
    This is actually disgusting. A rich and powerful man. One of the most privileged individuals on the face of the Earth, is rewarding the so-called...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 3rd May - 10:07am
    TCO, immediately above you state "I’ve no idea who “Sara Scarlet” is; that you readily believed we were friends confirms that you wish to pigeonhole...
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 3rd May - 10:07am
    Alas, alas 9 DUP would mean defeat for Naomi Long.
  • User AvatarSimon Oliver 3rd May - 10:06am
    Here's a completely off the wall idea. Coalition for the Union, with Clegg as prime minister acting as conciliator and buffer between Tories and labour....