What do you think was the second most important reason why people didn’t vote Tory in the Cotswolds?

Between us, Stephen Tall (he of the Oxford Comma cartoon) and myself (purveyor of news about commas in election law and academic research), appear to be carving out a niche in political punctuation coverage.

I fear it is all going to end in tears when someone puts our own punctuation habits under the microscope, but before it does I have exciting, related news to report.

I have blogged before about the fall-out amongst Cotswold Conservatives following their big losses to the Liberal Democrats in May’s local elections, including their fear that they are seen as “toffs legislating for toffs”.

Now, however, I have got hold of a copy of their full election post-mortem, and therefore have seen not only the full list of reasons Cotswold Conservatives have come up with for their electoral hammering, but also the order in which they have placed them.

Number one is a familiar one from post-mortems in all parties – blaming another part of their party for not giving them enough support. Further down the list are other factors, including the toffs problem, raising parking charges and the controversy over the council spending £19,000 on a magician.

But wait, what sneaks in at the top of the list, above all those, and in fact coming second only to blaming other parts of their own party?

It is this: “Grammatically incorrect literature”.

I salute the electors of the Cotswolds for their exacting standards when it comes to deciding who to vote for.

Note: Of course, any spelling or grammatical errors in this post are deliberate irony, ok?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/25579 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDaniel Henry 31st Jul - 12:19pm
    I share Bill's view. Whatever challenges we face in terms of housing, inequality, climate change, resources, etc, I think we've been more than compensated with...
  • User AvatarGlenn 31st Jul - 12:18pm
    Anyway, to the various people responding to my most thank you for your time, but we'll have to agree to disagree, I will only add...
  • User AvatarDuncan Stott 31st Jul - 12:17pm
    I'd like it to be held in Latvia/Lithuania/Estonia, just to troll Putin. There was a fledgling "Lib Dem Friends of Football" at one point -...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Jul - 12:13pm
    peter tyzack So it is right that a sanction exists to expel someone, who regardless of their own beliefs or their past work for the...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Jul - 12:09pm
    Ian Sanderson (RM3) Even when they are touted as ‘efficiency’ reorganisations come with an upfront cost; staff may be entitled to redundancy payments and/or early...
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 31st Jul - 11:52am
    I apologise My comment above was to Steve