What do you think was the second most important reason why people didn’t vote Tory in the Cotswolds?

Between us, Stephen Tall (he of the Oxford Comma cartoon) and myself (purveyor of news about commas in election law and academic research), appear to be carving out a niche in political punctuation coverage.

I fear it is all going to end in tears when someone puts our own punctuation habits under the microscope, but before it does I have exciting, related news to report.

I have blogged before about the fall-out amongst Cotswold Conservatives following their big losses to the Liberal Democrats in May’s local elections, including their fear that they are seen as “toffs legislating for toffs”.

Now, however, I have got hold of a copy of their full election post-mortem, and therefore have seen not only the full list of reasons Cotswold Conservatives have come up with for their electoral hammering, but also the order in which they have placed them.

Number one is a familiar one from post-mortems in all parties – blaming another part of their party for not giving them enough support. Further down the list are other factors, including the toffs problem, raising parking charges and the controversy over the council spending £19,000 on a magician.

But wait, what sneaks in at the top of the list, above all those, and in fact coming second only to blaming other parts of their own party?

It is this: “Grammatically incorrect literature”.

I salute the electors of the Cotswolds for their exacting standards when it comes to deciding who to vote for.

Note: Of course, any spelling or grammatical errors in this post are deliberate irony, ok?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 1st Oct - 1:01pm
    The poster calling himself "Tsar Nicholas" has a well-known history of engaging in acrobatic apologetics for the Putin régime in Russia, denying, minimizing, or otherwise...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 1st Oct - 12:58pm
    I am not sure what you are arguing against, we do campaign on "Bread & Butter" stuff all the time, see the Witney campaign as...
  • User AvatarBen Midgley 1st Oct - 12:53pm
    Thank you Jonathan for this detailed and properly considered article about Syria, not Yemen, Libya or Iraq, nor even Russia, or Iran, but Syria -...
  • User AvatarDJ 1st Oct - 12:51pm
    "So we should focus on housing (100% on the Farronometer there) – making housing available and affordable." But we should also focus on communities (as...
  • User AvatarMartin 1st Oct - 12:50pm
    "Flawed institution"? - Name for me one institution that is not 'flawed'. We can put forward tangible benefits (employment benefit and welfare policies etc.), but...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 1st Oct - 12:21pm
    Prisoners with violent pasts wishing to be released as soon as possible would apply for a transfer to Grendon. There were more applications than places....