What do you think was the second most important reason why people didn’t vote Tory in the Cotswolds?

Between us, Stephen Tall (he of the Oxford Comma cartoon) and myself (purveyor of news about commas in election law and academic research), appear to be carving out a niche in political punctuation coverage.

I fear it is all going to end in tears when someone puts our own punctuation habits under the microscope, but before it does I have exciting, related news to report.

I have blogged before about the fall-out amongst Cotswold Conservatives following their big losses to the Liberal Democrats in May’s local elections, including their fear that they are seen as “toffs legislating for toffs”.

Now, however, I have got hold of a copy of their full election post-mortem, and therefore have seen not only the full list of reasons Cotswold Conservatives have come up with for their electoral hammering, but also the order in which they have placed them.

Number one is a familiar one from post-mortems in all parties – blaming another part of their party for not giving them enough support. Further down the list are other factors, including the toffs problem, raising parking charges and the controversy over the council spending £19,000 on a magician.

But wait, what sneaks in at the top of the list, above all those, and in fact coming second only to blaming other parts of their own party?

It is this: “Grammatically incorrect literature”.

I salute the electors of the Cotswolds for their exacting standards when it comes to deciding who to vote for.

Note: Of course, any spelling or grammatical errors in this post are deliberate irony, ok?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/25579 for Twitter and emails.


Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 28th Nov - 1:12am
    @ Social Liberal.. I think there are a few problems with your proposals... Firstly, if we arm the "Free Syrian Army" with heavy weapons, the...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 28th Nov - 12:52am
    Richard Underhill, ah, thanks. I must admit I was about 9 when he was doing that and not playing very close attention! I did have...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 28th Nov - 12:41am
    Not much hope for the west in terms of a prosperous and secure future. Our foreign policy professionals just seem to be moaning about border...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 28th Nov - 12:11am
    @ jonnymc, I believe that the Terence Higgins Trust participated in the drawing up of the 2011 guidelines, which were changed from a life time...
  • User AvatarSteve 27th Nov - 11:12pm
    "Are there other groups imagined to have higher HIV infection rates than the general population" There's nothing imagined about it. What the scientists have done...
  • User Avatarexpats 27th Nov - 11:05pm
    Eddie Sammon 27th Nov '15 - 7:28pm....Hi expats, I just want Daesh defeated and the civil war over with. If the experts are saying Assad...