Council by-election results: 11 August 2011

Islington LBC, St Peter’s
Lab 1167 (52.5; +17.5)
LD David Sant 440 (19.8; -9.6)
Con 381 (17.1; -9.1)
Green 176 (7.9; -1.4)
Ind 59 (2.7; +2.7)
Majority 727
Turnout 24.78%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2010.

Windsor and Maidenhead UA, Eton and Castle
LD George Fussey 208 (47.4; +19.6)
Con 182 (41.5; -23.7)
Lab 32 (7.3; +0.3)
UKIP 17 (3.9; +3.9)
Majority 26
Turnout 24%
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2011

North Devon DC, Fremington
Ind 501 (46.9; +5.2)
Con 308 (28.8; +16.2)
Ind 196 (18.3; -13.6)
Green 64 (6.0; +6.0)
[LD (0.0; -6.1)]
[Ind (0.0; -7.7)]
Majority 193
Turnout 29.99%
Ind hold
Percentage change is since May 201

Dawlish TC, Central and North East
Ind (Voice for Dawlish) 323 (45.6)
LD Judith Robins 311 (43.9)
Green 75 (10.6)
Majority 12
Turnout 16%
Ind gain from Con.

Newton Abbot TC, Bushell
LD Mandy Voaden 327 (50.8)
Con 317 (49.2)
Majority 10
Turnout not known
LD hold.

Full by-election info and commentary at the Association of Liberal Democrat Councillors.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Council by-elections.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/24997 for Twitter and emails.

7 Comments

  • paul barker 12th Aug '11 - 4:21pm

    Looking at the figures for the last 3 weeks we seem to be holding on to the 2010 vote. That is vastly better than we were doing a few months ago.

  • I agree – possibly some encouraging signs in the last few weeks results (and no, someone hasn’t hacked my account!)

  • Well it must be good news if Hywel is encouraged by the figures.

  • Am I correct in thinking that our vote in Tory held seats – a number of gains – and weaker by far in Labour held areas – lower votes nearly every time.

  • Simon, you will probably be surprised that I am also encouraged! There seems quite strong circumstantial evidence in some areas (and in eg the ICM Grauniad Poll) that we have made some measure of recovery – seems to be less real condemnation of the party around.

  • I know Dawlish is only just across the estuary, but I don’t know the Tory story there, Rich. However, I imagine it is only likely to be one of two things, 1 Couldn’t find a candidate / mistake in nomination, or 2 Tacitly backed a sympathetic Independent to make it more likely they would beat us.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael Parsons 21st May - 11:34am
    Quite right Shirley! And as a Lib Dem party member I was horrified that the amendment extending Civil Partnership to heterosexual couples was rejected. So...
  • User AvatarAshley 21st May - 11:26am
    Forget what people do or do not do, it does feel rather dissapointing to people who are instinctively liberal that someone who calls themselves liberal...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 21st May - 11:23am
    I must say I much prefer the coalition agreement position to our party policy. Why would you call for an in-out referendum unless you want...
  • User AvatarRichard Wingfield 21st May - 11:16am
    I agree that we should focus on the positives here. The Lib Dems have championed equal marriage in government and there are some really outstanding...
  • User AvatarGareth Aubrey 21st May - 11:08am
    If you don't think what the MPs did is compatible with representing our party's value, get them deselected or disapproved. And if you find out...