Court bid to get Woking election result overturned

Get Surrey reports:

Woking Borough Council (WBC) will appear at the High Court later this month after an application was made to declare an election result invalid.

Labour hopeful Mohammad Ali, who came second at the borough council election for the Maybury and Sheerwater ward in May, has submitted the claim, highlighting what he calls ‘persistent electoral irregularities’ including the number of postal votes in the area and rejected ballots.

With the final vote standing at 1,088 to 1,072 in favour of Liberal Democrat incumbent Cllr Mohammed Bashir, Mr Ali, of Walton Road, Maybury, lost out by just 16 votes, and believes a hearing at the High Court would produce sufficient evidence for a recount…

He states: “My agent increased my vote by one by demanding a third recount with a new team of counters, which the ERO (electoral registration officer) initially did not want to do.

“In 2005 all the marked registers were lost so allegations of persistent double voting could not be checked and no explanation was given by the council,” he adds.

 

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Mohammed Ali will get votes on his name alone.

  • No one likes losing by a few votes, particularly if they feel that there was something not quite right about the count, but this is still very ill-advised. My experience of two elections where this sort of action has been taken is that the electorate does not like a poor loser and takes advantage of a re-run election to punish the person who has brought the case.

  • Daniel Henry 23rd Jul '12 - 4:29am

    Sounds to me like baseless speculation.
    Unless he has evidence that there’s been fraud then there’s no grounds for a re-match.

    Derby Arbouretum on the other hand…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Robinson 27th Sep - 10:44pm
    Jock, I run a property investment business, regenerating town centres, I've been interested in getting to grips with LVT so will give this a read...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 27th Sep - 10:37pm
    @Tsar Nicholas "The most significant exhange of the evening was Trump’s condemnation of a switch in US policy to one of a nuclear first strike...
  • User AvatarRoland 27th Sep - 9:35pm
    @Bill - Just the use of the word 'partnership' instead of 'union' is to be commended! Just skimmed through the links, looks interesting because it...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 27th Sep - 9:20pm
    grahame lamb Yes. It is rather a shame that the technical schools didn’t find more favour. It would be good to set up some technical...
  • User AvatarRoland 27th Sep - 9:02pm
    Re: "The BMA screwed this up" I found it a little irritating the article failed to distinguish between the BMA and the BMA's Junior Doctors’...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 27th Sep - 8:35pm
    Clinton Cash is not a "documentary" BTW.. It is not exactly impartial, with the film funded by the CEO of the Trump campaign!