Cutting council tax – the view from a Lib Dem council

Liberal Democrat run Three Rivers District Council has just set its part of the council tax at an average of £154.30 – just over 2% BELOW the equivalent figure for 2006/07. This is a cash reduction, so next year people will be paying 2.3% less than they were paying six years earlier. When inflation is taken into account, the cut is almost 20%.

Only one other local authority (Hammersmith & Fulham) has achieved a cash reduction over this period – and unlike the London borough, Three Rivers was not previously run by a profligate Labour administration to provide easy targets for cuts.

So how have we achieved this?

Certainly not as a result of generous Government funding. Our medium-term financial plan assumes Three Rivers will suffer one of the largest percentage reductions in central government support of any council in England, falling from £5.7m in 2010/11 to below £3.5m by 2014/15. Even after adjusting for some transferred responsibilities, this it is a reduction of almost 30% over the four year spending review period, compared to an average for England of 15% – the second-highest reduction of any council in England according to DCLG figures published last year.

Nor have we cut front-line services. We have taken a conscious decision not to cut those services most valued by local residents and have continued to invest in our environmental services (our recycling rate has now reached 62%) and in leisure, including two new leisure centres, one in partnership with neighbouring Watford.

With the support of our committed staff and Chief Executive we have made significant savings in back office and administrative costs. Efficiency savings (defined as savings that do not affect the level of service offered to residents) are rigorously sought each year, and a further £1/3 million for the coming year brings the total saved since 2005 to over £3million. Not bad for a small district council.

This total includes the savings from sharing back-office services with neighbouring Watford. This has been a long-term plan, started well before the current vogue for shared services, and has been implemented cautiously and professionally. We have achieved fully integrated shared services, with services operating from each council’s premises and entirely new terms and conditions for all staff. The inevitable teething troubles have been overcome and the required savings delivered without affecting the level of service offered to residents.

We have introduced further innovations, including a Customer Services Centre, where the overwhelming majority of all calls into the council can be dealt with by the first person answering the phone. We have also sought to share facilities – for example the local police station in Rickmansworth now occupies space in the council offices that was otherwise unused as a result of the transfer of the council’s housing stock to a new housing association and some of the council’s leisure facilities to a charitable trust.

Councillors have also shown leadership in the efficiency drive, proposing cuts to allowances in 2011 and avoiding using taxpayers’ money to fund members’ administrative support.

We intend to continue to run the council in a similar manner, with a long-term recognition that we are the custodians of residents’ money and responsible to ensure that everything that is raised in tax is spent in the most effective possible way.

* Cllr Matthew Bedford is the Deputy Leader of Three Rivers District Council and the Executive Member with responsibility for Resources.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • I think the achievements are brilliant but I would urge caution in the statement “When inflation is taken into account, the cut is almost 20%.”. This would be the case if peoples wages had kept up with inflation over the last few years. I’m not sure about your area but this is certainly not the case in mine…

    The real problem with comparing the efficiency of various councils is that they have such varying demographics and local circumstances. That said the Lib Dems have a great local record and should shout it from the rooftops…

  • The comparison with H&F is interesting. They are making massive cuts to funding for children’s services for example. Disadvantaged children in H&F are “easy targets for cuts” because they can’t even vote.

    Like any other taxpayer I’m all for paying less tax, but you can’t make massive cuts without someone losing out.

  • H&F haven’t just slashed services. They’ve sold their assets at inflated prices by offering a developers’ free-for-all. The legacy of our Tory council is the loss of community housing and iconic buildings such as Fulham Town Hall and the Earl’s Court Exhibition Centre, some of the worst traffic congestion and air pollution in the country, and a planned skyline of high-rise buildings along the river and in conservation areas, including a ‘cluster’ of 30-storey skyscrapers just next to Earl’s Court.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBill le Breton 24th Aug - 6:53pm
    Peter, we speed it up (or set a speed) when someone we really believe says 'this is the speed I shall set and shall not...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 24th Aug - 6:53pm
    The obituaries of Sir Antony Jay show that Yes Minister and Yes Prime Minister (currently repeated on BBC2) were about the serious issue of public...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 24th Aug - 6:42pm
    Catherine Jane Crosland Of course in practice reserved seats often do remain unclaimed, but Corbyn would not know whether or not they would be claimed....
  • User AvatarGordon 24th Aug - 6:38pm
    Bill le Breton - I basically agree but there are some serious problems with a monetarist approach (of whatever flavour). Firstly, there are so many...
  • User AvatarKaterina Porter 24th Aug - 6:33pm
    Lord Leveson had quite a lot to say about the amount of falsehood in press coverage of the EU which built up a popular picture...
  • User AvatarStimpson 24th Aug - 6:29pm
    Corbyn simply wants the railways to be run by the RMT, TSSA, ASLEF, commuter groups and rail users groups - all who have agendas which...