Daily Mail sued by Carina Trimingham

The Press Gazette reports:

MP Chris Huhne’s partner Carina Trimingham today brought a High Court damages action over a “cataclysmic interference” with her private life.

The PR adviser, whose adulterous affair with the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change became public in June 2010 – with Huhne leaving his wife of 26 years – is suing Associated Newspapers for misuse of private information.

Her counsel, William Bennett, told Mr Justice Tugendhat in London that – in eight newspaper articles and on its website Mail Online – the Daily Mail had exercised its expertise and determination to dig into 44-year-old Trimingham’s private life and disclose embarrassing facts…

“It is exposing aspects of the sexual history of the claimant which she says she is entitled to keep confidential, and we say there is no public interest in exposing those elements of her.”

You can read the full story here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

12 Comments

  • Well, what on earth did she expect? I detest the Daily Mail, but if you choose to catapult yourself into the public eye in the way she did, it shouldn’t be that surprising that the press focuses on certain aspects of her private life! No sympathy.

  • By choosing to have an affair with a married senior politician (who, in addition, was already the subject of a potential scandal over his wife and driving license points – not anything to do with Ms Trimingham, but he was already in the tabloids for the wrong reasons). I’m not moralising – she can do what she likes – but there is an element of accepting consequences and personal responsibility in this, isn’t there?

  • I thought Liberals also believed in rights and responsibilities…

  • @Graducat – yes, but she did neither. From what I recall, the affair was going on before the 2010 election – it was only after that that Chris Huhne became of interest to the Daily Mail.

    And in any case, are you really saying that people shouldn’t have any kind of romantic link with someone in public life if they had something which the Daily Heil might decide at some point to print in order to cause embarrassment? If so, then that would probably exclude most of us!

  • So what are we saying here? Is it that any politician who has sex is somehow a bad person? Should we ban politicians from having any fun at all, I remember John Prescott being attacked for playing a game in a garden, that game was croquet but the point remains.

    Politics is a job – any people in politics should be allowed some time to go off-duty and relax, have a life and maybe some fun just like any other person.

  • If you don’t want to get shot, don’t stand in the firing line and then complain about the consequences.

  • Tony Dawson 6th Oct '11 - 6:58pm

    “people in the public eye are not entitled to a private life.”

    Sexual dishonesty is no different than any other kind. It is useful to know about any ind of dishonesty from a politician, or business partner.

    All you have a right to keep private is that which IS private. Anything which you do privately with someone else remains confidential to you two until the time one person decides it is not. That seems to me to be a good reason for not doing anything with anyone which you would be ashamed of, and not dumping people in a nasty fashion.

    There is no real difference between someone telling half the pub that their lover has dumped them and run off with someone of the same gender and telling the Daily Mail the same thing. Ordinary working people deal with people spilling the beans about their ‘private life'(sic) all the time. They get on with their lives. Why ‘celebrities'(sic) think they are entitled to any better treatment is completely beyond me. Oh yes! They have the money to sustain the legal actions.

  • “By choosing to have an affair with a married senior politician (who, in addition, was already the subject of a potential scandal over his wife and driving license points”

    Whether he was a senior politician when this started is open to debate. And I wasn’t aware I needed to do due diligence on potential partners to see if they had any scandals brewing.

    In any case, even if you accept there was a public interest in exposing the affair (and there probably is) is it necessary (and is there a public interest in) exposing the previous sexual history of the party who isn’t a public figure.

    On reading the above I think the cause of action is based on the exposure of that information – not publishing a story that she was having an affair with Chris.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo 11th Feb - 12:03am
    Thomas yes , I agree but was questioning the level of support and not wondering in what way we could monopolise things , by any...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 10th Feb - 11:32pm
    Ruth -doesn't your example illustrate the flawed reasoning here however? Men make up 20% of Primary Teachers not because they are discriminated against when applying...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 10th Feb - 11:30pm
    Chris_sh - Horse-trading is just a rude word for negotiation and compromise, which are essential for adult politics. It works well when parties have a...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 10th Feb - 11:29pm
    Caron Lindsay 10th Feb '16 - 10:40pm No, inbetween.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 10th Feb - 11:25pm
    The process is accelerating. Sir Winston Churchill thought that referendums were undemocratic, the sort of thing that Mussolini would do. Edward Heath thought the same...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 10th Feb - 10:40pm
    Can I just say to @tpfkar that the Holyrood and Welsh Assembly elections are NOT local elections. They are our general election.