<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily View 2×2: 9 February 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/daily-view-22-9-february-2010-17879.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/daily-view-22-9-february-2010-17879.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Suffield</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/daily-view-22-9-february-2010-17879.html#comment-107047</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Suffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17879#comment-107047</guid>
		<description>Ewan&#039;s only apparent points on &quot;why AV could be better than STV&quot; is just the old &quot;AV excludes minority views from government so I can continue to trample on this minority that I don&#039;t like&quot; (which I really dislike; each party has been preaching this one, and the only variation is whether they&#039;re picking on gay people (Tories), foreigners (Labour), or nationalists (Liberals)), plus the &quot;MPs should be working in Westminster, not in their constituency&quot; line which appears to have been lifted out of the Tory playbook.

He doesn&#039;t consider all the reasons why STV is better than AV - such as the fact that under a proportional representation system, most people in the country would have an MP who represents their views, while under AV (or worse, FPTP) half the population of the country is stuck with an MP who is from an opposition party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ewan&#8217;s only apparent points on &#8220;why AV could be better than STV&#8221; is just the old &#8220;AV excludes minority views from government so I can continue to trample on this minority that I don&#8217;t like&#8221; (which I really dislike; each party has been preaching this one, and the only variation is whether they&#8217;re picking on gay people (Tories), foreigners (Labour), or nationalists (Liberals)), plus the &#8220;MPs should be working in Westminster, not in their constituency&#8221; line which appears to have been lifted out of the Tory playbook.</p>
<p>He doesn&#8217;t consider all the reasons why STV is better than AV &#8211; such as the fact that under a proportional representation system, most people in the country would have an MP who represents their views, while under AV (or worse, FPTP) half the population of the country is stuck with an MP who is from an opposition party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/daily-view-22-9-february-2010-17879.html#comment-107045</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=17879#comment-107045</guid>
		<description>Thank you for remembering Ian.

Sharon Mail
Author
We Could Possibly Comment - Ian Richardson Remembered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for remembering Ian.</p>
<p>Sharon Mail<br />
Author<br />
We Could Possibly Comment &#8211; Ian Richardson Remembered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

