Daily View 2×2: 23 December 2009

2 Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Yesterday was a busy one on Lib Dem Blogs, though a lot quieter if you take out the posts from Lib Dem councillors and campaigners giving people information on snow, gritting and road conditions.

Spotted any other great posts in the last day from blogs that aren’t on the aggregator? Do post up a comment sharing them with us all.

2 Big Stories

I’m going to work on the assumption that you’ve noticed the spot of bad weather we’re having and don’t need me to point it out to you.

More poor people should marry, say Tories
The Conservatives want to use the tax system to encourage more poor people to marry. There’s a green paper on the way.

Mr Willetts argued that marriage helped couples stay together, for the benefit of the children.

The shadow universities and skills secretary, whose responsibilities include family issues, told The Guardian: “I think there are things that have gone deeply wrong with our country.

“The rate of family break-up is a disaster for children.”

Foreign criminals showered with taxpayers’ money

As surely as night follows day, the Taxpayers’ Alliance can be guaranteed to come up with some kneejerk response to a story like this one in the Express.

It’s an outrage that foreign criminals, on release from prison, are being given an extra £454 pounds if they agree to voluntary deportation, as part of a package worth up to £5,000 in total. A waste of our money, we’re told.

Of course, no mention is made of how much it costs taxpayers to deport someone if they don’t go voluntarily. This parliamentary answer from earlier in the year suggests it costs between £12,000 and £25,600, meaning this scheme – whatever its other merits or failings – saves taxpayers thousands of pounds for each criminal who accepts the offer and leaves the country.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/17307 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • Grammar Police 23rd Dec '09 - 11:07am

    The whole Tory ‘marriage’ agenda really annoys me – even if one accepts that in some way marriage is intrinsically better for society than unmarried relationships (which I don’t – not that I think it’s worse, I just don’t think the link between marriage and a better society is proved), assuming that financial benefits will encourage people to get/stay married is just nonsense.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:29am
    When we review the party constitution next year (first I heard of it, maybe because I was entitled to go to Glasgow and vote, but...
  • User Avatarrobert sayer 23rd Oct - 9:26am
    John Dunn. ignores the outlandish and brazen misinformation expressed by some in his party(including its leader) and attempts to sanitize it But as I said...
  • User AvatarRichard Fagence 23rd Oct - 9:21am
    I usually agree with the remarks made by Helen Tadcastle but, on this occasion, I'm afraid we have to disagree. I shall be casting my...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:18am
    There are some important perceptions here, and I speak as someone who was out in the constituency most days. What we need to do, though,...
  • User AvatarJohn Kelly 23rd Oct - 9:01am
    What's the date of the conference and where is it being held?
  • User AvatarJo Hayes 23rd Oct - 8:58am
    Douglas Carswell had been MP since 2005 and built up a large personal vote based on casework, of which his literature boasted. Impossible to say...