Daily View 2×2: 23 December 2009

2 Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Yesterday was a busy one on Lib Dem Blogs, though a lot quieter if you take out the posts from Lib Dem councillors and campaigners giving people information on snow, gritting and road conditions.

Spotted any other great posts in the last day from blogs that aren’t on the aggregator? Do post up a comment sharing them with us all.

2 Big Stories

I’m going to work on the assumption that you’ve noticed the spot of bad weather we’re having and don’t need me to point it out to you.

More poor people should marry, say Tories
The Conservatives want to use the tax system to encourage more poor people to marry. There’s a green paper on the way.

Mr Willetts argued that marriage helped couples stay together, for the benefit of the children.

The shadow universities and skills secretary, whose responsibilities include family issues, told The Guardian: “I think there are things that have gone deeply wrong with our country.

“The rate of family break-up is a disaster for children.”

Foreign criminals showered with taxpayers’ money

As surely as night follows day, the Taxpayers’ Alliance can be guaranteed to come up with some kneejerk response to a story like this one in the Express.

It’s an outrage that foreign criminals, on release from prison, are being given an extra £454 pounds if they agree to voluntary deportation, as part of a package worth up to £5,000 in total. A waste of our money, we’re told.

Of course, no mention is made of how much it costs taxpayers to deport someone if they don’t go voluntarily. This parliamentary answer from earlier in the year suggests it costs between £12,000 and £25,600, meaning this scheme – whatever its other merits or failings – saves taxpayers thousands of pounds for each criminal who accepts the offer and leaves the country.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/17307 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Grammar Police 23rd Dec '09 - 11:07am

    The whole Tory ‘marriage’ agenda really annoys me – even if one accepts that in some way marriage is intrinsically better for society than unmarried relationships (which I don’t – not that I think it’s worse, I just don’t think the link between marriage and a better society is proved), assuming that financial benefits will encourage people to get/stay married is just nonsense.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 4th Sep - 7:37pm
    Jayne Mansfield 31st Aug '15 - 6:29am The signatories to the 1951 convention are nation-states, mostly (EU members all) signing the same document. Therefore they...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 4th Sep - 7:35pm
    Sounds like the need for a proper sensible assessment of Corbyn's QE policy instead of the usual knee jerk loony left abuse stuff. David Blanchflower...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 4th Sep - 7:28pm
    Salmond does let his mouth run away with himself but he's no John Knox................ and there's no doubt Nicola is in charge now (remember the...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 4th Sep - 7:24pm
    @expats I don't know if the other Labour candidates would make an impact, but I don't think they'd repeat the disaster of 1983. Even if...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 4th Sep - 7:24pm
    @Little Jackie Piper I think you're right. Corbyn is the candidate of the zeitgeist of a small angry minority, but he has little in common...
  • User AvatarRoland 4th Sep - 7:24pm
    @Phyllis - ".but land, or rather a homeland is what is needed for these refugees." There is such a land and it currently goes by...