David Laws: Free schools should focus on education, not profit

David Laws is interviewed in the current issue of Attain, a magazine focussed on the independent schools’ sector, where he has the following to say on the issue of whether free schools should be permitted to make profits:

I think it is important that the people who come in and deliver the education should be seen to be doing so for reasons relating to education and delivering an improved quality of education. And I think that the public would be far more suspicious of the free school development if they felt it was about people coming in to make profit out of state education. I think there would be the risk of a political backlash… So I think that we have got to demonstrate and prove that this is not about some sort of agenda of allowing people to make a profit for its own sake. It is driven by the need to improve the education system to allow a wider range of education modes to be tried out in the UK.

However, Laws doesn’t rule out profit-making being allowed in the future:

I think that we would be unwise to rule out the possibility of it ever happening, but I don’t think it should happen over the next few years. I think that we need to embed the existing new programme of Free Schools and demonstrate that it is about education performance and not about allowing people to ‘exploit’ the education system. And I think that we would have to show that we have got adequate controls in place to make sure that public money was not filtered of.

In the interview, Laws also rebuffs the suggestion by Michael Gove, the education secretary, that private schools should be more active in establishing new free schools:

I think that the primary responsibility for the governing bodies and headteachers in the independent sector is to deliver what they are being paid for by the parents  - which is to deliver a good education to their children. Their job is not to deliver state education.

The full interview can be found in the current (Spring) issue of Attain magazine, which is available via the Attain website after a quick (and free) registration process.

* Nick Thornsby is Thursday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs here.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/26549 for Twitter and emails.

8 Comments

  • david thorpe 11th Jan '12 - 3:21pm

    we should follow the advice of the great Liberal, JM Keynes, who said:

    “The state should provide only those things which the private sector cannot provide”.

    Universal schooling up tp the age of 18 is one of those things.

  • Richard Shaw 11th Jan '12 - 6:22pm

    @David Thorpe

    Did Keynes ever specify if “Universal schooling up tp the age of 18″ was one of “those things” he was referring to?

    Suppose we had schools run by the state, private companies, community enterprises, etc. and they received all their funding from central taxation based on the number of pupils, with the same amount per pupil (maybe different amounts depending on the pupils’ respective school year). No admission fees. Assume they had to meet all the same tight regulatory standards with regards to food, environment and quality of teaching to prevent sacrificing quality for profit, and that they have a board of governors elected by and from the people in the catchment zone.

    Supposing the above, what does it matter who the provider is as long as they are all adhere to the same minimum standards?

    My main problem with Academies and Free Schools are that they don’t have to adhere to the same standards as state schools (offal burgers anyone?) and that they are unaccountable to local people, unlike state schools (who are accountable via the LEA).

  • Free schools can surely be quite accountable to the parents of the children at the school?

    To be honest, I think working for the education of children vs. making money is a false dichotomy, and it’s not necessarily a productive way to look at education. You can do both. Does removing all profit motive improve standards? That’s all I’m really concerned about.

  • Is being accountable to the parents of pupils at the school the same as being accountable? What about future pupils and parents? What about the community?

    Sal

  • Surely, the Government’s responsibility in education is to get the optimum overall results out of its investments. The last years have demonstrated that spending considerable amounts of money playing around with the governance of schools and pandering to the electorate with the myth of “parental choice”, has done nothing to improve outcomes.

    What would improve standards is to spend that money on improved training for teachers, solid internal structures, sensible evaluation and improved leadership. Given that so many academies have failed, that the Swedish “free” schools have created huge problems, that the US “charter” schools are in many case worse than the locally accountable schools, it is time we stopped wasting money on the vanity projects of successive governments.

  • Richard Swales 12th Jan '12 - 11:53pm

    I run an after-school/after-work English-language school for profit. We provide a better service than the state-subsidised competition.

    In other fields of human activity it is not assumed that the profit motive must destroy quality – we don’t assume that a car from a state-owned or state-supported car factory must be better than one made by a company paying out fat dividends and bonuses.

    I tend to think though that if Laws isn’t proposing it now he doesn’t need to waste political capital arguing for it now.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarBill le Breton 19th Apr - 5:56am
    Hi Peter. My starting date is December 81 which is 5 months before the invasion. During those 5 months the Con vote rose 50% ......
  • User AvatarPeter Chegwyn 19th Apr - 1:29am
    I think the Falklands War in 82 had something to do with that turn round Bill.
  • User AvatarDuncan Brack 18th Apr - 11:46pm
    David White - you are right about Beveridge (except that 1945 couldn't be called a khaki election - unlike 1900, for which the term is...
  • User Avatarmalc 18th Apr - 10:51pm
    Mark Valladares Sorry I shouldn't have said military bases, but we do - or may be did until recently, not sure after defence cuts -...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 18th Apr - 10:24pm
    But what be the biggest shift for a Governing Party over a period of 13 months? Try December 81 to Jan 83. If potential turn...
  • User AvatarEd Wilson 18th Apr - 10:12pm
    Let's try again. "...power 4 million homes..." means onshore wind produces a number of kilowatt hours which, when divided by the notional power consumption of...